February, 2018: Explaining Job Numbers to Trump Fans

 

EXPLAINING JOB NUMBERS TO TRUMP FANS

 

Can’t we all just get along? Conservative friends of the blogger who glance at these posts always seem so…mad.

 

Let us strive to find common ground. For example, are monthly job gains good so far under Emperor Trump?

 

Yes.

 

Are they as good as under President Obama, notorious Kenyan interloper, according to Trump?

 

They are not.

 

____________________

 

This is what we liberals refer to as “using facts.”

____________________

 

 

We of the liberal persuasion will do our best to outline relevant facts. Let us begin with a quick perusal of the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports to form a picture of the growth of the job market in recent years.

 

Unless I have made some minor error in addition the total number of jobs added each year, once the Great Recession ended, would be as follows:

 

2011:   2,074,000

2012:   2,176,000

2013:   2,301,000

2014:   3,004,000

2015:   2,720,000

2016:   2,345,000

2017:   2,114,000

I added a chart later, which covers all of Trump's time in office.

 

Of course, conservatives once insisted job numbers couldn’t possibly be that good. You may even remember that happy day when Candidate Trump claimed 93 million Americans were without jobs.

 

That claim was so far-fetched it seemed no one who could count on fingers and toes and come up with anything close to “twenty” would fall for it.

 

Yet many in Trumpistan did.

 

Suppose this claim had been true. Even if we cut Emperor Donald I some slack, even if we ignored the entry of a couple million young people into the labor force this year, even if we simply subtracted the number of jobs created in 2017, it would mean at least 91 million Americans still lack employ.

 

 

Ten thousand baby boomers retired every day.

 

Of course, I know my conservative friends like to say the job gains under Obama didn’t hold up because the labor participation rate plunged. Magazillions of Americans, they insisted, had given up looking for work. So, we can check Bureau of Labor Statistics and see what we find. That participation rate did drop from 66.2% in January 2008 to a 62.7% in December 2015.

 

I would point out to my Trump-loving friends that 10,000 baby boomers retired every day. I would do my best to explain how this would impact the labor participation rate. Senator Rob Portman, an admitted Republican, said as much, but in a different context, in a 2014 speech. This figure, 10,000, was reported first in the Wall Street Journal. It was then analyzed by the Washington Post. The Post agreed Portman’s figure was accurate, meaning 3.5 million Baby Boomers were bowing out of the job market every year. My friends of conservative bent did not wish to hear such math.

 

It made them angry when I kept citing figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

 

In fact, who can forget Candidate Trump insisting that Obama’s good job numbers were one of the “biggest hoaxes in politics.” The monthly numbers remained a hoax till he took office. Then the numbers became, in some magical fashion, real. Press Secretary Sean Spicer said so himself, as soon as the first good reports were issued for Trump. The numbers “may have been phony” before, Spicer informed stunned reporters.

 

They were “very real” now.

 

Again, this humble blogger had a hard time believing anyone could fall for such math-defying dung.

 

 

The economy had shed 4,000,000 jobs.

 

Today we find ourselves in a position to study the job numbers for the first year of the reign of Emperor Donald I. Technically, he should not get credit for all gains in January 2017 since he took over after 19 ½ days had passed. Still, we shall allow him all those gains. (We are if nothing else, gracious in our assessment.)

 

As we can quickly see, if we grab our calculators and start punching buttons, Obama added more jobs five years in succession (2012-2016) than the Donald I in 2017. Finally, we should disabuse our conservative friends of the idea that Trump “inherited a mess” when he took office. For 76 months in succession, jobs had been added to the U.S. economy, starting in October 2010.

 

By comparison, Mr. Obama did inherit a mess. If we consider the last eleven months of 2008 and the first 19 ½ days of January 2009 (assuming Obama could not cause job losses till he took the oath of office at noon on January 20), we learn that he took over an economy which had just shed 4,072,000 jobs.

 

Even Donald J. Trump can probably tell. Losing 4,072,000 jobs in one year is worse than gaining 2,000,000 + jobs annually for six years.

 

What does that leave Trump to brag about when comparing job numbers? True, gains could strengthen in months ahead. He could outperform Obama in the end. We cannot know. We can, however, knock another plank out of the argument that economic miracles have been performed since he took office.

 

For those who love Trump, we also find that labor participation rates have ticked down slightly in the last year.

Summing up, again focusing on facts, as far as job creation is concerned, Emperor Donald is doing a good job.

 

He’s not doing significantly better than the man who preceded him in the White House. In fact, he’s doing a bit worse.

 

And, just for fun, remember that Mr. Obama was never accused of paying off porn stars during his time in office.