Farkie and Friends - The Epstein Files

“Picture Farkie in the woods.” 

WE NOW KNOW THAT New York real estate giant and billionaire Andrew Farkas exchanged at least 2,000 emails with Jeffrey, in one referring to their friendship as “one of the blessings” in his life and describing the serial molester of young girls and women as “one of the bravest men I’ve ever known.” 

In one friendly email Farkas responds to a question from Jeffrey Epstein, to say he is at Yosemite National Park, where large fires are burning, and ash is falling all around. Andrew refers to himself with a kind of nickname, the two friends must us, as in “Picture Farkie in the woods.” 

Epstein replies with what seems like a creepy tale: 

as the story goes. a little girl walked into those woods late at nite and bumped into Farkie. She jumped and screamed in fright upon seeing him , Farkie says, hey it ok , nothing to be afraid of. she said yes, but seeing you frightened me, farkie said , you think your're frightened imagined mine as I will have to walk out of here in the dark all alone. 

 

Farkas is also known to have made visits to Little St. James Island, where so many sexual assaults were said to take place. 

(Blogger takes a moment to barf.)

 

The blogger also checks – as the blogger always tries to do. Indeed, in another email to Jeffrey, from October 2009, Andrew describes himself as “your old pal farkie.” 

I also see that he was in Yosemite for three days, after promising his wife that they would go, and then also spend three days “driving around in a camper” before heading to Aspen. So, yes, Farkie and Jeffrey were pals. 

Then I see another version of the document, one in which Epstein replies, “sorry, i will be at the ranch in aug come visit”

 

We also know that in June 2017, Farkas could invite Epstein to his annual “Fark of July food truck fest – live bands, fireworks, everything. Please come if you can. I can provide a chopper and you can stay the night. I’d like that.” 

Jeffrey says he can’t come. He’s in Paris, but adds, “I’m going to Paris but yep assistants im sure would enjoy if ok” 

“Any time! I’m single now…” Then he adds, “Need names for security list.” 

Finally, Farkas ends the communication with, “Start time 6:30. End Time 10:00. Brooklyn food trucks. Amazing bands. 150 people. REDACTED [appears to be part of a sentence] Farkie there on his own. 

Well, not quite. In another document, Farkas wonders, “Should we expect them? [A short sentence may be REDACTED, or several names.] 

Then we have another document – which is similar to all the others, but fails to include the “Should we expect them?” line. But Epstein emails the rest of the string to what would appear to be at least two, possibly three participants, with all names REDACTED: 

 

And then we have another version, with Jeffrey answering this time to the question, “Should we expect them?” with a simple, “Yes” 

Finally, at 1:20 a.m. on June 30, 2017, Epstein forwards the whole string of emails to REDACTED, which could also be one of the many victims of his sex-trafficking operations. 

(Just two rich bachelors looking for a little fun.) 

 

You also wonder what Epstein knew. In one exchange of text messages, starting on August 8, 2018, Harry Fish and Woody Allen are involved. Epstein suggests wisely that “I leave it to you [name REDACTED in document] but I suggest if someone ask you about visiting me, its about global economics” 

(Does he mean: Not girls?)

 

Epstein notifies a participant (name REDACTED), “[Barry] Karp coming tomorrow morning at 11.” 

Farkie then chimes in, “Should I drop by?” 

On August 9, Epstein tells REDACTED, “Interesting point. - jared [Kushner] and don jr. as they have jeopardy in so many states. Can always take the fifth , even if granted immunity . Or pardoned..” 

Woody Allen joins the discussion, then we have a possible “Farkie sighting,” who I think asks if he should “drop over” to see his friend Jeffrey. Or, since the names of senders and recipients are redacted, could a victim be asking?

___

WE ALSO LEARN that starting on December 6, 2018, Nadia Marcinkova, one of Jeffrey’s most loyal aides – but also one of his very young victims – began cooperating with investigators. 

According to a claim she made to the Department of Homeland Security, she had been victimized for fifteen years, starting in 2003.

Applicant was recruited, harbored, and obtained by Jeffrey Epstein and others for purposes of sexual slavery. On numerous occasions, Jeffrey Epstein coerced, threatened, and forced Applicant into submission for purposes of him committing sex acts with or unto her. Applicant shared pictures of injuries she sustained as a result of sex acts Mr. Epstein's subjected her to.

 

Applicant informed us that she and some of her [REDACTED – SEVERAL NAMES ?], directly and indirectly, have received threats during Applicant’s participation in the investigation and prosecution of criminal charges against suspects/defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Applicant expressed fear of retaliation or revenge by individuals connected to or implicated in the alleged criminal acts of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. Applicant has expressed fear of serious harm by such individuals if she were to be removed from the United States.

 

The investigations in which she participated ended on June 28, 2022. It was on that day that Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to prison.

Epstein was surrounded by beautiful young women, like Marcinkova,
who he paid to have trained as a pilot.

The beautiful young women were the main attraction for other men.

Dr. Peter Attia and "Low Carb" Oral Sex - The Epstein Files

 

“Low carb” oral sex.

YOU NEVER KNOW who might appear in the Epstein Files. Today, we bring you the story of Dr. Peter Attia, the longevity expert for CBS News. He has now resigned his post after his ties to Epstein were exposed.

For instance, in one document, from January 16, 2015, we learn how he first met Jeffrey: “Eva Andersson made the intro to Jeffrey.” 

(Eva plays a weird role in the Files, if you haven’t heard.) 

Epstein and Eva Andersson: She has been called the love of his life.

 

How friendly are these two men, one an expert on longevity, the other interested in girls just past puberty? In one “humorous” message Peter tells Jeffrey, “Pussy is, indeed, low carb. Still awaiting results on gluten content, though.” 

Attia appears in 1,746 files – for example, in July 2015, he asks about a visit to Epstein’s New Mexico ranch. “When are you in NM? Do you have a ‘formal’ plan for when you want certain folks there?”   

Dr. Attia later adds, “Ok, I def’n want to make the pilgrimage. 

The Zorro Ranch, as it was named, is one of several locations where all kinds of crimes against girls and women are known to have occurred. 

On August 2, 2015, Epstein tells Attia about a dinner he has set up: “where are you? i might be in la monday, burbank to look at the interior of the other bbj [a new jet], tonite dinner with musk thiel zuckerburg. .” 

That would be: 

Elon Musk 

Peter Thiel 

Mark Zuckerberg

 

In another string of emails, to set up a visit at Epstein’s New York City mansion on September 14, 2015, it is decided that date won’t work. Would 5 p.m., the next day, be good for Dr. Attia, was the question. 

Maybe dinner and non-gluten eating? 

In January 2016, a string of emails centers around a gift of flowers Dr. Attia makes to Lesley Groff and an interesting comment from Attia, “I go into JE withdrawal when I don't see him...,” he says of his friend. 

Dr. Attia also asks Jeffrey what kind of “meds” he’s on, and how he’s tolerating treatment, in a message from November 2016. 

What catches my attention here is that the doctor’s name, offering treatment is “Moskowitz.”

And a “Dr. Moskowitz” was marked as an important witness worth investigators knowing, in an unredacted copy of Epstein’s stolen black book, which surfaced, and then vanished again, in 2015. 

I realize, because I’ve been reading a great deal, but we also find a “Dr. Bruce Moscowitz” in the Epstein Files. He appears at one point to fear he may be forced to testify along with Ghislaine Maxwell in some potential investigation. 

Redactions make it hard to tell, exactly, what is at stake. 

Even stranger, a “Dr. Bruce Moskowitz” is known to be a member at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club – so it would be a thrill to know if one Bruce is the same as the other. Certainly, I find it odd that there are two doctors in the Files, with identical first names, dealing with Jeffrey, but spelling their last names one vowel apart. 

A little further checking reveals to the dedicated blogger that Dr. Moskowitz is a Palm Beach, Florida doctor (uh, oh), and that he has enough clout with President Trump to derail a potentially lucrative deal involving companies seeking a contract with the Veteran’s Administration. 

Or, as one VA official explained how Dr. Moskowitz’s managed to block the plan, “Power and influence are power and influence.” 

See: Timeline entry for December 29, 2018, for more on the other Dr. Bruce Moskowitz’s links to Epstein. 

(Unless the two are the same.) 

 

As for Dr. Attia, there’s a possible meeting in Vancouver, in late January 2016, when his and Epstein’s schedules may mesh. Peter “would love” to see Jeffrey, as we learn, in July 2016. We also know that Dr. Attia messaged Epstein on November 20, 2016, saying, “I miss you! When are you coming back? Maybe I need to visit you there.” That is: in Palm Beach. And there is a hope that Attia might be able to come over and play with Epstein in February 2017. 

On September 28, 2018, Epstein has a visit with Attia scheduled, and a breakfast with Peter Nowak. 

(As we shall see, Nowak’s not looking too good, either.) 

 

In any case, my “favorite” chain of messages, so far, involving Attia, comes from June 24, 2015. Epstein replies to an email from his doctor friend, with one of his own, bearing the subject line: “Got a fresh shipment.” 

Attia appears to have sent photos; but the blogger is not sure how the Epstein Files are set up for search. 

Epstein responds, “me too” and clearly sends a photo. 

Attia, “Please tell you found that picture on line...bastard.” 

Epstein: “fraid not” 

Attia: “You the biggest problem with becoming friends with you? The life you lead is so outrageous, and yet I can’t tell a soul...” 

In any case, I must leave Dr. Attia for now (having checked only 140 of the Files in which his name appears.)

 

Doctors doing dubious house calls. 

BUT WAIT, there’s more (as always). Just as I am getting ready to post my latest blog entry,  The New York Times breaks a story about the doctors who helped Jeffrey Epstein keep his sex-trafficking operation running smoothly, whether they knew about his underlying crimes or not. 

And one of the keys to his success was Dr. Eva Andersson-Dubin, who had married billionaire Glenn Dubin in 1994. 

Dr. Dubin helped her old boyfriend connect with medical professionals at Mount Sinai and even lined up jobs for two girls Epstein recommended. 

As the Times reports: 

In 2012, a young Russian woman wrote to Mr. Epstein to ask if he would mind if she had sex with another man if they used a condom. “You must first go to the gyno,” he replied, saying that Dr. Dubin would call her.

 

In a subsequent message, he said Dr. Dubin would coordinate the referral: “Eva will organize pussy doctor.” (Dr. Dubin was not on the emails.) The woman later reported back that Dr. Dubin had given her phone numbers for two doctors.

 

Around the same time, Dr. Dubin also arranged for the young woman, identified in emails as an undergraduate, to get a volunteer position at the reception desk of the Dubin Breast Center. Though the hospital’s union resisted using an unpaid worker, the gig was approved after Dr. Dubin appealed to the hospital’s president.

 

“I told them she will only sit there and look pretty,” Dr. Dubin told Mr. Epstein after it was official.

 

Several months later, Mr. Epstein emailed Dr. Dubin with an urgent problem: He and the Russian student were flying to New York from his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. She had fallen off an A.T.V., Mr. Epstein wrote, leaving a large gash across her forehead that needed attention. “Can you organize thanks,” he wrote.

 

Dr. Dubin responded that one of Mount Sinai’s plastic surgeons, Dr. Jess Ting, was “standing by” and added that she herself would join them. The next day, Mr. Epstein recounted to an assistant that Dr. Ting had given the woman 35 stitches while she was “laid out on the dinng room table.”

 

A photo that appeared to capture the scene – with faces redacted – was included in the government’s initial release of Epstein files. After inquiries from The Times, the Department of Justice posted a different version of the photo that appears to show Dr. Ting.

 

An email sent two days after the incident refers to antibiotics that Dr. Dubin gave to the woman on the night of the procedure.

 

Dr. Margaret Moon, a physician and expert in medical ethics at Johns Hopkins University, told The Times that the incident was “breathtaking.” With such a serious wound, she said, the woman should have been treated in an emergency room equipped to handle any complications.

 

Stitching her up on Mr. Epstein’s dining table was “a choice made not in the patient’s best interest but in, it sounds to me, a friend’s best interest,” Dr. Moon said. “That is very difficult to justify.”

 

(This sounds exactly like people covering up some kind of crime.)

 

The Times also found that Dr. Ting, his girlfriend and her children visited Epstein’s Caribbean island. 

Then the doctor made more house calls – to talk to one of Jeffrey’s girls about a nose job and to remove a fatty cyst from Mr. Epstein’s shoulder. The chairman of Dr. Ting’s department warned him about operating at a home and “said if I did it there I would be sanctioned!” 

“Ridiculous,” Dr. Ting said he replied. 

When asked to comment on the story, Dr. Ting provided a statement: “In my treatment of these adult patients, I never knew, witnessed, or had any knowledge of any illegal or potentially illegal activities.” 

(I mean, who doesn’t ask to have someone stitched up on their dining room table?) 

 

The House Call Doctor first claimed that he was not the person stitching up the girl on the table. Then the unredacted version showed he was. 

Then Dr. House Call decided not to add further comment. 

He decided he would ride with his obligatory, “I regret” statement, from when he was first contacted by Times reporters: “Mr. Epstein represents the very worst of human nature, and I deeply regret having had any association with him.” 

I bet he does. 

Does this look wise?

___

In keeping with our usual methods, we list here individuals who should be asked to show up and testify publicly, and under oath, in front of Congress. We also need to have a Special Prosecutor appointed to launch a full investigation into the crimes of Epstein, Maxwell, all their enablers and all their clients. 

To be called for testimony: 

99. DR. PETER ATTIA

99. EVA ANDERSSON-DUBIN (she married Glenn Dubin in 1994)

99. DR. BRUCE MOSKOWITZ

99. DR. BRUCE MOSCOWITZ

99. GHISLAINE MAXWELL

99. DR. JESS TING

                        (yeah, her every time)

99. LESLEY GROFF (granted immunity in the Florida case)

 

Man in Epstein Files Totally Exonerated!

 

Man in Epstein Files Totally Exonerated!

 

GOOD NEWS! Now that the Department of Justice has released all documents and evidence it has, related to Jeffrey Epstein, one man has finally been exonerated. 

A victory for decency, as last! 

Who might this pillar of virtue be? Les Wexner? Bill Gates? Or could it be former-U.S. Senator George Mitchell? 

No doubt you will be amazed to learn that the first man to be exonerated – totally – is Donald J. Trump! 

In happier times: Donald, Melania, Jeffrey and Ghislaine.

 

*

Donald calls the cops – after the cops make the arrest. 

THIS FEEL-GOOD SAGA began to take form earlier this month, when a key document in the Epstein Files proved that Donald had called the cops back in 2006, to say he was thrilled that they were going to investigate Epstein. The future president even suggested that they go after Jeffrey’s partner in pedophilia, Ghislaine Maxwell. 

That hag, he warned, was “evil.” 

This earthshaking news broke because the free press was on the job and reported on the document, and White House Press Secretary Karolyn Leavitt was asked for comment. Naturally, she was proud to announce that the email proved Donald had been telling the truth about Epstein for decades. 

 

In fact, the MAGA faithful quickly began to claim that the president had, in fact, been something of a hero – quick to contact authorities – intent on bringing an abuser of young women to justice. 

*

 

“Everyone has known he’s been doing this.” 

WE HATE TO NITPICK, but there may be a few questions that still need answering. The document that has thrilled the president’s defenders is dated April 23, 2020. In October 2019, not long after Epstein killed himself, Michael Reiter, former Palm Beach, Florida chief of police, sat down for an interview with F.B.I. agents. At one point – perhaps because he had been asked a related question – he said that then-Citizen Donald had called him in the summer of 2006, to talk about Epstein. 

“Thank goodness you’re stopping him,” Trump is quoted as telling Chief Reiter, “everyone has known he’s been doing this.” 

Trump fans heard the news and started shooting off fireworks and thanking Jesus and knocked on “libtard” neighbors’ doors to inform them that this proved Donald was always an excellent citizen. Not once in a hundred million years would Donald J. grab a woman’s pussy, even though he bragged that he did. 

So, how much “credit” does Donald Trump get for tipping off police to the need to arrest the Florida pedophile and his accomplice? We know that Epstein was indicted by a grand jury on July 19, 2006. We know that the indictment was unsealed on Monday, July 25, and that the Palm Beach Post broke the story the next day. 

Now we learn that in 2019, thirteen years after Epstein was first arrested in Florida, Reiter told agents what he could remember from the summer of 2006. As for Donald being exonerated, here’s the paragraph that sent chills up and down MAGA spines, apparently because many Trump supporters are blinded by loyalty, or possess the same reading skills as Cocker Spaniels. 

As the F.B.I. report notes, Reiter (whose name is redacted for some reason) explained: 

Palm Beach Country Club is a Jewish country club. A lot of wealthy people are there and they flock together. Mar-A-Lago is a mixture of everyone. DONALD TRUMP told REDACTED that he threw EPSTEIN out of his club. TRUMP called the PBPD [Palm Beach Police Department] to tell him “thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this”. TRUMP told him people in New York knew EPSTEIN was disgusting. TRUMP said MAXWELL was EPSTEIN’s operative, “she is evil and to focus on her”. TRUMP told REDACTED that he was around EPSTEIN once when teenagers were present and TRUMP “got the hell out of there”. TRUMP was one of the very first people to call when people found out that they were investigating EPSTEIN. 

 

At this point, I feel the need to break it to Donald’s fans as gently as I may. Donald is not a hero and he’s not exonerated. 

Not totally. 

Not even partially. 

A)   He called authorities after people, including himself, found out there was an investigation.

B)    He muffed his chance to gain credit when he said that “everyone has known he was doing this.”

C)   Huh?  

D)   Did he admit that he and others knew about the pedophile’s crimes? And did not one person in his Palm Beach or New York City circles call long before news of an investigation broke?

E)    Was Donald admitting that he had seen Epstein with underage girls, and it scared him enough to get “the hell out?”

F)    And did he still decide not to call until he heard there was already an investigation???

G)   And had any of the MAGA faithful thought to themselves: “Wouldn’t Donald be among the first to call Chief Reiter, to cover his own tracks, if he thought police were going to investigate – and might find enough information to charge others with related crimes?” 

 

In fact, we should all remember that when asked directly, in July 2019, if he had “any suspicions” that Epstein was molesting girls, President Trump told reporters: “No, I had no idea. I had no idea.” 

It was that same month, of course, that Trump’s own Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, was revealed to be the “brains” behind a sweetheart deal that allowed Epstein to avoid a prison sentence in 2008 that should have stretched across four or five decades. Or even life plus ninety-nine years. 

And then, by pure chance, Mr. Acosta ended up in Trump’s first cabinet. 

Now he was forced to resign. 

And who can forget that stunning day when Donald was asked about Ghislaine Maxwell, following her arrest in 2020, and he said he “wished her well,” which was a head-scratching moment. 

And then there was the second time, not long after, and he doubled down, saying once again, “I wish her well.” 

And then there was that time, in the summer of 2025, when Donald was asked by a reporter if he had considered a pardon for the woman he had labeled “evil.” 

And Trump said he hadn’t thought about a pardon for Ghislaine, but he had the power to grant one. 

Then the weeks flew by, and Donald was asked again, last October, by a member of the free press, if he had ruled out any pardon? This time he said he hadn’t heard Ghislaine’s name in so long, he hardly remembered who she was. “I haven’t heard the name in so long,” he said. Then he added, “I can say this, that I’d have to take a look at it. I would have to take a look. I will speak to the DOJ.” 

(If you’ve been reading the Epstein Files, or even reading about them, you will know that Ghislaine Maxwell should never be pardoned, not so long as she or Donald J. Trump should live.)

 

* 

Where did the interview reports go? 

THE QUESTION, then becomes, not whether Donald is exonerated, but, rather, “Is Donald one of the countless villains, now stripped of the cover of secrecy, as the Files are released and then read? 

Today we learn that multiple news outlets have been digging into one fresh story – that certain important documents have not been released. 

We know, if we are keeping up with news about Jeffrey and Ghislaine, and all their friends, that all kinds of behaviors that people of good morals might find repugnant, not to mention felonious sexual abuses of all kinds, have now been revealed. Heads have been lopped off (metaphorically), around the globe, as ordinary people (like this simple blogger), and a focused free press keep digging into the morass. 

But not Donald J. Trump’s head. According to White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson, not a single hair on his head has been mussed! As she sees it, probably because it’s her job to see it this way, Donald J. Dumpling has “been totally exonerated on anything related to Epstein.”

 

* 

“Due to fear of retaliation.” 

LOOK, I’m obviously no fan of Donald Trump; but I’ve spent several hundred hours delving into the Epstein Files. I am not yet ready to pronounce guilt on anyone mentioned, not Mr. Trump, not former-President Bill Clinton, not Mr. Elon Musk, nor Mr. Kimbal Musk, his younger brother. I’m not sure Mr. Leon Black, or Mr. Jes Staley, or Mrs. Glenn Dubin committed any crimes. 

I am sure of this. No one whose name appears hundreds or thousands of times in the Epstein Files has been “totally exonerated.” If you say that they have, you must either be a liar, or you must be a numbskull. 

Indeed, it turns out that a certain set of files – perhaps of critical importance – have disappeared from DOJ records. These documents are mentioned in the Files, but at least four F.B.I. interviews with an alleged victim who came forward in July 2019, soon after Epstein was charged with federal crimes, cannot be found. We know agents followed up on her claims in August and October. We also know they would have taken careful notes (also missing) and would have filed reports (three of four are missing). 

In the one report that still exists, the alleged victim tells F.B.I. agents that she was repeatedly raped, sometimes violently by Epstein, back in the 80s, when she was between the ages of 13 and 15. No one would doubt that Epstein was capable of these kinds of sexual crimes – but the victim also claimed she was violently assaulted by a young version of the current President of the United States. 

This victim claimed she did not know who Epstein was, until he was arrested in the summer of 2019, when a friend sent her a picture – which she told agents she had kept on her phone. What do know that agents said it was a widely distributed photo of Donald and Jeffrey together. When she was asked if they might take a picture of her phone screen, showing the picture she had been sent, she asked that President Trump be cropped out. Her lawyer, who sat in on the interviews, interjected, explaining that his client “was concerned about implicating additional individuals, and specifically any that were well known, due to fear of retaliation.” 

Was her claim corroborated in any way? We cannot know unless we see all the documents. The New York Times notes that a lawyer who used to represent the woman in a lawsuit against the Epstein estate declined to comment. That suit was later dropped; but court records do not reveal whether his client was compensated or not. 

Hard to assess the truth of this woman’s accusations when the public records are clearly incomplete. 

Donald may not be guilty. 

He is most assuredly not exonerated, as of today.

In fact, exonerations, so far, as proven by the Files, are in very short supply. As in “0,” so far. Former Norwegian Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland, who apparently appears in damning situations, was admitted to the hospital on Tuesday after what has been reported as a suicide attempt. 

(I have not yet read up on his ties in the Files.)