Showing posts with label Brian Kilmeade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brian Kilmeade. Show all posts

Saturday, June 11, 2022

March 14, 2018: Fox News Claims Conor Lamb, a Democrat Who Won a Special Election, is Really...a Republican

 

3/14/18: Wednesday, the president awakes, vigorously scratches his crotch, and clicks on the TV. He wants to see how the special election in Pennsylvania Congressional District 18 turned out. Tuning in to Fox & Friends, he wonders if he’s in store for good news or bad. Imagine his pleasure when Steve Doocy explains that Conor Lamb, the likely winner, “ran as a Republican.” 

“Melania,” Trump shouts in the direction of the bathroom, “did you know Conor Lamb was a Republican?” 

He forgets Melania is now sleeping in a separate bedroom (see: 2/13/18). Rumor has it she has a sign posted on the door: “Go sleep with Stormy, #POTUS, you pussy-grabbing Lard Ass.”




 

It takes the president a moment to focus. Trump knows he can’t lose, regardless of the outcome of the special election. Lamb, who he labeled “Lamb the Sham” on Saturday, during a campaign rally for Rick Saccone, is – like Saccone – apparently, a Republican! 

That explains why the GOP spent $10 million in an effort to defeat him. (On Fox News this somehow makes sense.) 

Brian Kilmeade, the other male member of the Three Stooges, outlines all the reasons Democrats should be worried. Lamb ran away from Democratic leadership! He didn’t dare take on Trump! Naturally, the president is lapping up all this propaganda. Ainsley Earnhardt agrees. Lamb “has more of a Republican agenda than he does a Democratic agenda,” she says. This proves Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer need to sweat the midterms in November. 

Sitting up in bed, Trump throws a fist in the air. “I am the greatest POTUS ever!” he shouts. For a moment he loses his train of thought. 

God, Ainsley has sweet legs. I’d like to grab some of that!

 

He refocuses. The Stooges agree that polls showed Lamb winning by six points just a few days ago; but he won by only two tenths of a percent. That shows you how much success Trump had when he went to Pennsylvania to campaign for Saccone. And how about a shout out for Don Jr. and Vice President Jesus, who both visited Pennsylvania 18 to push for Saccone! 

Truly, they must be rejoicing at the Republican National Committee today. Trump carried the district by 20 points in 2016. Now, a Democrat a Republican, Conor Lamb, carries Pennsylvania 18 by roughly 600 votes. 

 

FUN FACT: If you missed Saccone’s closing argument on why voters should pick him, he insisted Democrats hate Trump, hate America and…hate God! 

That’s what he really said.



If the First Lady ditched her philandering husband,

no one would blame her.


Thursday, April 7, 2022

June 23, 2020: The President Wants Another Critic Locked Up


6/23/20: The bad news keeps piling up. GNC, the health and wellness retailer, announces it will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and close 800 to 1,200 stores. There are estimates that 25,000 U.S. stores will close this year. The International Monetary Fund predicts that the global economy will contract by 4.9% in 2020. The estimated recover in 2021 is expected to be weaker than predicted as recently as April. If there’s a major new outbreak of the coronavirus, the recovery will shrivel to nothing.


 

____________________ 

A typical day in Trumpistan. Bend the rule of law. Silence the critics. Protect the felons.

____________________

  

Meanwhile, in a speech to a group called “Students for Trump,” at the packed Dream City megachurch in Phoenix, Arizona, the 3,000 young people in attendance were clearly counting on God to protect them from the virus. Masks were conspicuous by their near-total absence. Social distancing was impossible. 

Trump was happy because people were cheering him again. He told listeners they were the defenders of our culture. He said they would never “kneel to the radical left.” He warned, without citing proof, that Democrats wanted to let everyone vote, “even if they’re not citizens.” The way the virus is spreading lately with Trump getting a large, well-earned share of the blame and the way the polls are running, the Democrats won’t need help from non-citizen voters, even if they did want it. 

(They don’t.)

 

With five months until the election, you never know what will happen. Still, GOP leaders must be sweating. A poll of Montana voters last month showed Trump favored over Biden by five points (45%-40%), in a state he won by 20 four years ago. Even more ominously, if your name is Milksop Mitch McConnell, former Democratic Governor Steve Bullock had a seven-point lead in the same poll, over incumbent U.S. Sen. Steve Daines, 46%-39%.


* 

AND WHAT DAY in Trumpistan is ever complete without fresh evidence that there is no rule of law Trump won’t bend to protect himself and those he loves. Namely: he loves those who protect him. 

Tomorrow, Aaron Zelinsky, one of four prosecutors who quit the Roger Stone case in protest, will tell the House Judiciary Committee that they were pressured to give Stone a break because he was a pal of the president. “What I heard – repeatedly – was that Roger Stone was being treated differently from any other defendant because of his relationship to the President,” the former DOJ lawyer will say in prepared testimony. 

“Zelinsky will appear alongside antitrust prosecutor John Elias, who plans to testify that Attorney General William Barr personally ordered the Justice Department's Antitrust Division to launch politically motivated reviews of 10 cannabis mergers,” Politico reports. Zelinsky’s testimony will be “a stunning – and stunningly rare – public rebuke of Justice Department leadership by a sitting official.” 

Zelinsky will also say that prosecutors were prepared in February to hit Stone with a steep sentencing recommendation. This, they believed, would be merited, due to Stone’s “long-term lying to impede an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, a grave national security matter.”  

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee will shrug their shoulders, and Rep. Jim Jordan will start yelling about Hunter Biden again. (See: 6/24/20.) Because let’s be honest. They don’t want to know what Stone might really know about the law-breaking efforts of President Trump. 

And Trump supporters won’t have a hint of a clue – that you don’t really want to have a president who cuts people who break the law breaks, so long as they help him break the law too.

 

* 

“Bending the criminal justice system to benefit” the president. 

IT’S NOT JUST Zelinsky and Elias who are deeply worried and fear Attorney General Barr is up to no good. 

Sixty-five law professors and faculty members at George Washington University Law School, Barr’s alma mater, have issued a statement of protest. Barr’s actions as attorney general, they write, “have undermined the rule of law, breached constitutional norms, and damaged the integrity and traditional independence of his office and of the Department of Justice.” 

Among the Attorney General’s sins, they note that he 

obfuscated and misled the American public about the results of the Mueller investigation. He wrongfully interfered in the day-to-day activities of career prosecutors, and continues to do so, bending the criminal justice system to benefit the President’s friends and target those perceived to be his enemies.

 

Finally, they add, “We include members of both major political parties, and of none. We have different legal specialties and represent a broad spectrum of approaches to the law.” 

And in this blogger’s words: They smell a skunk, who works for a bigger skunk. In the White House.

 

The New York City Bar Association chimed in in a letter sent to House and Senate leaders, stating emphatically that Barr is unfit for the “high position he occupies in our federal government” and should step aside.

 

* 

LAST, BUT NOT LEAST, we learn again that Donald J. Dictator has no idea how the First Amendment works. In an interview with Brian Kilmeade, on Fox News (free press working), he calls John Bolton a “stupid guy,” and a guy “with no heart (still the free press working). 

“I fired him. And I didn’t think it was a big deal. And I wasn’t around him very much,” the president said. 

Kilmeade does not bother to ask, “He was your National Security Advisor. Do you mean you didn’t spend any time with the man?” (Kilmeade is the free press not working.) 

“But what he did do is he took classified information, and he published it during a presidency,” Trump insisted, adding: “I believe that he’s a criminal, and I believe, frankly, he should go to jail for that.” 

(Note to Trump fans: Your president really wants to see a lot of critics go to jail.)

 

Later, he vented his spleen in another unhinged tweet. “Washed up Creepster John Bolton is a lowlife who should be in jail,” the President of the United States insisted, “money seized, for disseminating, for profit, highly Classified information.” (Free press dying – if Trump has his way.) 

Practitioners of the free press in this country have every reason to defend themselves and the whole “freedom” concept. 

So it didn’t help when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo backed Trump in his call to jail a critic. 

Pompeo said he had seen “young soldiers” prosecuted for the release of classified information “at a much lower level, who were much more junior” than Bolton. “This is something that has real criminal risk associated with it,” he told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “And for the life of me, I can’t figure out how it’s the case that this can be permitted to stand without a real response.”

 

Oddly enough, during a State Department briefing highlighting the importance of the free press, held via Zoom today, the spokesperson for State takes offense to a reporter’s question about Bolton’s book. 

“AT&T, we can mute that line,” the spokesperson says. 

And they did. 

Later, the spokesperson defended her decision, calling the reporter’s question about the book “offensive.” 

You know. Free press (the reporter) asking about Bolton’s book (more free press involved).

 

Shaun Tandon, the president of the State Department Correspondents’ Association, described the muting of the reporter as “richly ironic” considering the subject matter of the briefing itself. 

“We obviously do not draw any comparison between the conduct on this call and the tactics of the People’s Republic of China,” Tandon wrote in a letter of protest to the spokesperson. “But we believe that muting a reporter’s phone line, and describing a question as ‘offensive’ at the end of a briefing, run counter to the spirit of press freedom and to the professional atmosphere that we have both sought at the Department of State.” 

Yeah. Not in Trumpistan. Sorry. Silence the critics. 

Protect the felons.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE (7/16/21) I missed this story at the time, but on June 23, 2020, top White House aide Larry Kudlow makes it clear, as for the virus, we have nothing to fear but wearing masks.

 

“There is no second wave coming.” 

He says he’s not worried about a surge of COVID-19 cases. We shouldn’t be either. “There is no second wave coming. It’s just hot spots. They send in CDC teams, we’ve got the testing procedures, we’ve got the diagnostics, we’ve got the PPE. And so I really think it’s a pretty good situation,” he says. 

“There are some hot spots,” he adds. “We’re on it. We know how to deal with this stuff now, we’ve come a long way from last winter.” 

As we now know, this was a truly terrible prediction.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE #2: The Department of Justice opens a case against Bolton, but in the seven months remaining before Joe Biden takes over, no evidence is ever produced that Bolton revealed classified information in his book. In fact, a review found just the opposite. (See: 9/23/20.) 

The criminal investigation against Bolton is finally closed in June 2021, with no charges lodged against him.

Monday, February 28, 2022

December 13, 2021: Right-Wing Types Knew Who Attacked Capitol Hill

12/13/21: We learned today what many right-wing types thought was really going on as the January 6 riot unfolded. They watched the mob storm the halls of Congress with their very own peepers, and they understood who the attackers were and who stirred them to fury and violence.

 

____________________ 

“He’s got to condemn this shit Asap.” 

Donald J. Trump Jr.

____________________

  

Thanks to the Democratic-led committee – on which only two principled Republicans have had the nerve to serve – we know that even as the riot exploded, Donald Trump Jr. sent a text to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. He wasn’t blaming Joe Biden for what was transpiring. He wasn’t claiming left-wing plants were leading the mob on. He was begging Meadows to talk to his dad. “He’s got to condemn this shit Asap. The Capitol Police tweet is not enough,” Don Jr. insisted. 

Meadows didn’t respond with outrage and try to say that Black Lives Matter types were stirring the mob. 

He replied: “I’m pushing it hard. I agree.” 

So Don Jr. knew. 

And Meadows knew.

 

Even the Trump enablers at Fox News – who play dumb now and claim the attack wasn’t so bad, or if it was, it was because left-wing types tricked “patriots” into rioting – knew as events unspooled on television. They weren’t blind to reality. They saw what we all saw. Laura Ingraham texted Meadows, pleading with him to get the man in the Oval Office to call off the attack. “Hey Mark, the president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home … this is hurting all of us … he is destroying his legacy.” (For an entirely different take from the people at Fox News, see my post for 5/19/21.) 

And he was. 

And she was destroying her legacy as a journalist. She was collapsing the boundary between reporting and kissing ass. She was conflating herself and Fox and the attackers and the president into a grotesque “us.” 

Brian Kilmeade, another Fox News host, wasn’t blind. “Please get him on tv,” he said of Mr. Trump, in yet another call to Meadows. The mob is, “Destroying everything you have accomplished.” 

Sean Hannity urged Meadows to get Trump to do something, too. “Can he make a statement? … Ask people to leave the Capitol,” Hannity implored.

 

The answer, of course, was “yes.” Trump could have quelled the riot. Instead, he dallied and diddled and enjoyed watching democracy eat itself. 

The president’s goal was simple and entirely self-serving. He wanted to overturn the results of an election that he fairly lost. (See: 12/4/21; 12/28/21; 12/29/2 and 1/1/22.) 

The mob the president helped stir was just one of several deadly weapons he was ready to employ.

 

* 

OF COURSE, when you are revealed to have known the truth about who you believed stirred the mob on January 6, and you work for Fox News, you must wrestle the messenger to the ground and trample that person into the TV turf. 

At Fox, every day is a day for democracy to eat itself. 

After other networks dared to air Rep. Liz Cheney, heretofore all her life a Republican, reading the Fox hosts’ texts aloud, Ingraham used her show to blast the “regime media.” Those commie rats, you know she wanted to say, were “somehow trying to twist this message to try to tar me as a liar, a hypocrite who privately sounded the alarm on Jan. 6, but publicly downplayed it.” 

Well, yeah.

 

You did, Laura, sweetcakes. You knew Trump had to regain control of the mob – which mob you and your peers knew full well he stirred to attack. Then you told your viewers that  the rioters were “people who can only be described as antithetical to the MAGA movement.” 

You added helpfully that there “are some reports that Antifa sympathizers may have been sprinkled throughout the crowd.” 

And you said this: 

“I have never seen Trump rally attendees wearing helmets. Black helmets. Brown helmets. Black backpacks. The uniforms that you saw in some of these crowd shots … Those knee pads and all the pads on their elbows,” you hinted. “I have been to dozens of Trump events and the criminal actions we saw today do not represent this movement.”

 

(We know, if we simply bother to read the indictments prepared by the Department of Justice since that day, that those folks in tactical gear were indeed right-wing types from the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters, and groups of that nature.)

 

You made it as clear as you could. You hinted at others committing the violence. You had never seen Trump fans act like this. You even grabbed the mantel of patriotism and tried to drape it over the rioters that day. “We’re trying to save this country,” you said, “not to tear it down.” 

Then there was Hannity. He knew, too. He had called Meadows to have the president call off the dogs. Now, it was time for Hannity to describe those dogs on his show. The Trump people, “They were there to peacefully protest. Then we had the reports that groups like antifa, other radical groups — I don’t know the names of all of them — that they were there to cause trouble.” 

He didn’t “know the names.” Probably because he was making it all up. 

“There were reports that some of these groups were telling their members to dress up in, quote, ‘MAGA gear,’” Hannity added, in case his audience members still hadn’t sniffed the clues he was feeding.

 

Then there was Kilmeade texting Meadows – but on the air offering this delusional take for his poor uninformed viewers to swallow. “I do not know Trump supporters that have ever demonstrated violence that I know of in a big situation,” he said in the wake of the violent attack. 

More recently, Kilmeade, who knew on January 6 that the mob was destroying everything Trump had achieved (biggest federal deficit ever – loss of three million jobs during his time in office – not one, but two impeachments) offered up a brand new take. Now in November 2021, he invited Tucker Carlson onto his show, and posed this softball question: “Do you think maybe, perhaps, and maybe you don’t want to give away your series, [but do] you find indications that the FBI was actually pushing for this invasion?” Kilmeade wondered. 

Sure. The F.B.I. stirred up the mob – even though no one at the F.B.I. ever spoke on that fateful day. 

The plain fact is this. It was Trump who said his followers had to “fight like hell” that day, or they “wouldn’t have a country anymore.”

 

* 

A riot that “targeted the heart of American democracy” 

SO IT WAS. Fox News hosts knew on January 6 what was going on and then they got dumber as the weeks passed. Tucker Carlson, the top-rated host on the network, showed footage from the day of the riot during one evening show and said of the people inside the Capitol, “They don’t look like terrorists. They look like tourists.” 

That’s true if you looked at only the carefully selected clips Tuck decided to show. It’s not true if you select others, even if both sets of clips show part of what happened that day. I’ve looked into the arrests, so far, of 564 rioters from January 6. I would agree that a hundred or more were relatively harmless, caught up in the emotion of that day, and who went inside the Capitol just to experience the spirit of that day. But who stirred them up? Who plotted to overthrow a fair vote in several states? And if you mention the fact that dozens of police were inured that day, the idea that these were just “tourists” can only be called absurd. 

Sadly, absurdity sells at Fox News. So they sell all they can.

 

In one recent confrontation, Geraldo Rivera was a guest on Sean Hannity’s show. He had this to say of events of that awful January day: “This was a riot that was unleashed, incited and inspired by the president of the United States, which targeted the heart of American democracy.” 

Hannity told Rivera to stop talking. He told viewers that his guest’s words represented only his opinion. Then Hannity started spouting opinion like the Fontana di Trevi in Rome. What about that diabolical House committee in Congress, Hannity demanded to know! (None of the nine members of the committee attacked any police officers on January 6 and none have been charged with any crimes, as a result.) 

“The question is, this corrupt committee. The question is,” Hannity shouted, “why this riot and not 574 other riots?”

 

Me. Me. I taught history. I can answer that question. I know why the January 6 riot is far more important. The destruction that resulted during any number of Black Lives Riots was regrettable and counter-productive. That much is true. We have also had far deadlier riots in American history. (That was the argument Ingraham soon tried to make, as if to show what happened with all those Trump supporters running amok, wasn’t so bad.) I can list a few. The Watts Riot. The Tulsa Riot. The Hamburg Riot. The Zoot Suit Riot. The New York City Draft Riot in 1863. Even the Courthouse Riot in Cincinnati, which ended in cannon fire and dozens killed. 

But we have never had a riot, by people encouraged by the President of the United States, to attack one branch of the federal government, to serve the selfish needs of the other. In fact, it was a riot meant to overturn the results of an election – and served only the selfish interests of the head of the executive branch. 

After Rivera asked Hannity to try to “remember the frame of mind you were in when you wrote that text on January 6,” the host decided it was time to turn to a second guest, Dan Bongino.

 

This is Fox News, remember, where Laura Ingraham could speak of Team Trump and Team Fox as “us.” 

Bongino knew his job. He’s a bulldog, snarling and making biting verbal attacks on anyone with whom he disagrees. “The back-stabbing of the president you’re engaging in is really disgusting,” he tells Rivera. 

“We’re all Team Trump at Fox New,” is what Bongino meant, and if you forget that, you’re not just stating opinion. You’re “back-stabbing” the president, the man that Sean, Laura, Brian and Dan all love. 

Love more than democracy, itself, really.

February 6, 2022: Pence Upheld the Constitution - Trump Wanted to Tear It to Shreds

2/6/22: On any given day, the most colossal idiot could find Democrats willing to bash Republicans, Democrats ready to smash Republicans, and everyone else hating on Whigs. So, it’s always wise to tune out 95% of the noise in politics. 

On Sunday, however, a number of conservative voices were raised against former-President Trump in warning against what has become of the not-so-Grand Old Party.


 

On Meet the Press, Marc Short, former chief of staff for Vice President Mike Pence, offered his thoughts regarding the fable of the “stolen election.”

 

____________________ 

“Bad advisers, who were basically snake oil salesmen.” 

Marc Short, former chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence

____________________

 

 

Asked to comment on the idea that Pence could have overturned the vote and gifted Trump a second term, Short told NBC’s Chuck Todd, “I think unfortunately the president had many bad advisers, who were basically snake oil salesmen giving him really random and novel ideas as to what the vice president could do. But our office…researched that and recognized that was never an option.”

 

For Trump cultists let’s explain:

 

1.     Short says the Orange God was getting bad advice from “snake oil salesmen.” That is: con-men.

 

2.     The Orange God believed them.

 

3.     You believed the Orange God, who believed the con-men.

 

4.     Either the Orange God was so profoundly  flawed as a human being that he was an easy mark for “snake oil salesmen;”

 

5.     Or, much more likely: he is and always was himself a “snake oil salesman,” and like attracted like.

 

6.     Four or five, it’s the same. For those of you still members of the cult, it’s time to admit you got sucked in by “snake oil salesmen.”

 

* 

“January 6 was a riot that was incited by Donald Trump.” 

Short wasn’t alone in sounding the alarm. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie appeared on ABC’s “This Week” and took a crack at Mr. Trump. Responding to the claim that Pence could have overturned the results of the election, Gov. Christie refused to pull his punches.

 

“Let’s face it. Let’s call it what it is,” he told host Martha Raddatz. “January 6 was a riot that was incited by Donald Trump in an effort to intimidate Mike Pence and the Congress into doing exactly what he said in his own words last week: Overturn the election.” 

 

“[Trump is] trying to do a clean-up on aisle one here,” Christie added. “But it’s not going to change. He actually told the truth by accident. He wanted the election to be overturned.” 

 

* 

“An assault on the first branch of government.” 

On CBS , former Trump National Security Advisor Gen. H.R. McMaster was featured as guest. 

That’s Trump’s own choice for the job, and not to be confused with other Trump choices for top jobs, who variously came to view him as a fucking moron, a threat to the U.S. Constitution, the most flawed person ever, a man who put self-interest above national security interests, and now the man who hoped to advance the most un-American idea ever, so he could get a second term in office. 

Asked to respond to comments by the Republican National Committee and his former boss, the Orange God of Mar-a-Lago, McMaster pointedly disagreed with any defense of the Jan. 6 rioters. 

Those rioters weren’t patriots, as Trump insisted.

 

They weren’t engaged in “legitimate political discourse” as the RNC claimed in its recent statement. 

What happened on January 6, Gen. McMaster said, “was illegitimate political discourse because it was an assault on the first branch of government. I think it’s really important for us to come together now,” he added. “I really think it is possible to improve the transparency and the security of our elections while ensuring that every eligible voter gets to vote.” 

He thought about it a moment, then added, “It is pretty clear that we are emerging from a number of traumas of the past couple of years.”

 

Those traumas were: Donald J. Trump. 

– and – 

More Donald J. Trump.

 

* 

“Mr. Trump’s disgraceful behavior after the election.” 

IT COULD BE we are seeing the first signs of a rise among decent Republican and sensible conservative voices to take on the Orange God of Mar-a-Lago and try to return sanity to his bizarre cult. The Wall Street Journal, for example, backed the Vice President completely, saying, “Mr. Pence stands out as a rare Republican these days willing to stand up to Mr. Trump’s disgraceful behavior after the election. Too many in the GOP seem to have lost their constitutional moorings in thrall to one man.” 

Even Brian Kilmeade, in a broadcast of Fox Nation, said it was time for Trump to quit claiming he won the election in Arizona, in 2020. Kilmeade, who had kissed the Orange God’s ass so many times, he left a permanent imprint, must have been getting the word from on high. It would seem the Fox Empire has decided it might be time to cut ties with the lunatic. Kilmeade insisted, no one cared anymore about the last election. The OG’s constant whining about how the election was stolen was “cringe-worthy.” As for Trump’s claim that he had triumphed in Arizona, the Fox host got it partly right – and glaringly wrong at the end:

 

Nobody cares about 2020. Nobody. And everything that he said and the challenges that he made should have been done before the election. And they did a recount in Arizona, and the recount showed no difference almost, and he came out and said it showed that they won Arizona. That’s an outright lie, and please stop wasting our time with that, because he’s capable of doing so much more.

 

If you read Kilmeade’s comment one way, he’s saying Trump could change focus and offer his supporters “so much more.” 

What Kilmeade still hesitates to say – because he’s fundamentally a coward – is that what “more” Trump could offer, if he were elected president again was more outright lying and more and more serious threats to our system of government.

 

None of this is even the least difficult to comprehend. When asked if he agreed with Pence, Sen. Marco Rubio was clear. “Vice presidents can’t simply decide not to certify an election.” 

Trump said they could. 

Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming concurred, explaining on “Fox News Sunday,” that Mr. Pence “did his constitutional duty that day. It’s not the Congress that elects the president, it’s the American people.” 

Pence upheld the Constitution. 

Trump wanted to tear it into little pieces – and if we give him another crack in the Oval Office, he will try again. (See: 2/11/22.) 

 

FUN WITH – STUPIDITY: Republican senators reacted badly to news that President Biden planned to pick an African American woman to fill the soon-to-be open seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sen. Ted Cruz said that Biden was really saying to the majority of Americans, “I don’t care about you.” 

Whereas the majority of Americans – and we know Cruz means white folks – could only console themselves by gazing wistfully at Neil Gorsuch’s face. Or Bret Kavanaugh. Or Amy Coney Barrett.


Justice Neil Gorsuch.


Cruz also called Biden’s announcement an “insult to Black women,” which made pretty close to zero-point-zero sense. 

Not to be outdone, Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana quipped that he hoped Biden would pick someone who knows “a law book from a J Crew catalogue.” Because, I guess, Sen. Kennedy believes most black women can’t?