Showing posts with label election fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election fraud. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

November 8, 2018: Delusional President Claims "Complete Victory" in Midterms

 

11/8/18: President Trump says he’s excited about the “complete victory” he scored in the midterms, pretty much all by himself. But there are still recounts going on and he’s not having it! Naturally, he has to tweet: “Law Enforcement is looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud in #Broward and Palm Beach. Florida voted for Rick Scott!” 

(This claim will be badly undercut – by Florida law enforcement officials – less than twenty-four hours later. They say they’re not investigating.)

 

Meanwhile, we have 6,000 U.S. troops along the southern border, guarding against a “caravan” of “invaders.” 

If Trump is to be believed the “caravan” includes 500 “Middle Easterners” (also known as “500 terrorists”), 100 Mexican murderers, 350 dark-skinned rapists, an unknown number of smallpox carriers (see: 10/30/18), six dozen lepers, 1,200 members of the MS-13 gang, and clouds of miscreants who want to gain asylum by lying about why they’re walking thousands of miles to safety.


A "dangerous" immigrant from the Middle East.



*

____________________ 

“We are not anti-gun; we are anti-bullet holes in our patients.” 

Dr. Esther Choo

____________________ 

 

UNFORTUNATELY, the military won’t be able to protect people in a bar in Thousand Oaks, California. Late Thursday night, a shooter walks into a Country Western place and opens fire. Twelve are killed, including Ron Helus, a Ventura County deputy, the first officer at the scene. Helus bravely rushes in only to be shot dead by the killer. 

CBS describes the bloodbath: 

Nearly 200 were trapped as celebration turned to chaos. A gunman, dressed in all black and armed with a .45 caliber Glock handgun with an extended magazine, had stormed inside. He first shot a security guard at the front entrance, then deployed smoke bombs inside and opened fire, shooting at random.

 

Inside, 11 lay dead and panicked patrons scrambled for safety. Some dived through windows while others hid in restrooms.

 

“Our friends got the bar stools and they starts slamming them against the windows so we could get out... Just so we were able to get out,” one person said.

 

Naturally, the N.R.A. issues its standard boilerplate statement: Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. There’s no reason to ban guns. Rocks can kill, too! Rocks, paper, and scissors can all be deadly. Only a good guy with a gun (or scissors) can stop a bad guy with a gun (or scissors). And no, we do not want to make it harder for bad guys to get guns, which don’t kill people anyway. If we impose universal background checks the Second Amendment will be dead faster than you can list the dozen victims of this latest mass shooting. 

Expanding on its usual “all kinds of guns for all kinds of Americans at all times and in all places” position, the N.R.A. decides that this would be a perfect time to criticize doctors for pointing out that guns are increasingly at the root of a public health crisis. 

 

Response from the medical profession is swift. “We are not anti-gun; we are anti-bullet holes in our patients,” Dr. Esther Choo says. 

“We take care of these patients every day,” Dr. Joseph Sakran, director of emergency general surgery at Johns Hopkins Medicine, replies. “Where are you when I’m having to tell all those families their loved one has died?” 

Angered by the N.R.A.’s response to legitimate concerns, doctors begin posting pictures of their bloody clothing after they have operated on the latest in an unending parade of gunshot victims:

 


 

The Annals of Internal Medicine, journal of the American College of Physicians, which represents 33,000 members, pledges to urge members to talk to at-risk patients about gun violence. 

Again, CBS notes: 

Gun-related deaths are on the rise in the U.S., bucking a decade-long decline, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. During 2015-2016, the federal agency says there were 27,394 homicides involving firearms and another 44,955 gun suicides – the highest levels recorded since 2006-2007.

 

In 2015-2016, the latest year available, homicide was the 16th leading cause of death among U.S. adults and the third leading cause for children between the ages of 10 and 19, according to the report. Guns were used in 74 percent of all recorded homicides, and used in 87 percent of homicides involving youth.

 

“It is too soon to know whether recent increases in firearm homicide rates represent a short-term fluctuation or the beginning of a longer-term trend,” the CDC wrote in its report published Friday. The report referred to firearm homicides and suicides as “a continuing public health concern in the United States.”

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE (5/24/22): A check for more recent statistics proves confusing. The numbers cited above are correct, at least when I go to the link I used in 2018. (See first paragraph, after summary.) The numbers in the chart below are slightly different, 27,392 homicides, 44,950 suicides. (See Table.) 

So, I made no mistakes. 

Checking for current information, however, I find that the total number of gun deaths in the U.S. for 2020 is 45,222, with homicides having increased by nearly 5,000, since 2019. That total is said to be the highest since figures were first tallied in 1968. So the chart I used in 2018 has to be messed up, or I was misreading it (I still don’t see how.) My guess is that the figures provided were all homicides and all suicides in 2015-2016, not just firearms related. 

I happen to be on a call with my mobile phone provider – a form of hell in itself – when I start checking. I don’t see totals for 2021; but do find firearm mortality rates by state, according to CDC. 

In 2021, Illinois had a rate of 14.1 deaths per 100,000, which I looked up first, because Ex-President Blubber repeatedly blasts “Democrat-run cities” for the rise in violent crime, in particular gun violence.

 

He does not anyone in Texas, a red state, with a firearms death rate of 14.2, Oklahoma, also red (and bloodier) at 20.7, or, worst of all, Mississippi, with a rate of 28.6. 

New York, by comparison, has a 5.3 rate. 

The top seven states – if you hope to remain unpunctured by gunfire (including accidental and suicidal) – are blue.

 

1.      Hawaii                           3.4 per 100,000

2.      Massachusetts                    3.7

3.      New Jersey                        5.0

4.      Rhode Island                          5.1

5.      New York                         5.3

6.      Connecticut                       6.0

7.      California                        8.5

8.      Minnesota                        8.9

9.      New Hampshire                       8.9

10. Maine                               10.4

11. Nebraska                            10.1

12. Washington                          10.9

13. Iowa                                11.2

14. Vermont                        11.6

15. Wisconsin                       12.2

16. Oregon                        13.0

17. Virginia                        13.4

18. Maryland                       13.5

19. Pennsylvania                         13.6

20. South Dakota                        13.6

21. Utah                                13.6

22. Florida                              13.7

23. North Dakota                        13.8

24. Illinois                               14.1

25. Texas                                14.2

26. Delaware                        14.4

27. Michigan                            14.6

28. Ohio                                15.2

29. Colorado                        15.4

30. North Carolina                       16.0

31. Arizona                              16.7

32. Kansas                               16.9

33. Nevada                         17.0

34. Indiana                              17.3

35. Idaho                                17.6

36. Georgia                              17.7

37. West Virginia                          18.1

38. Kentucky                             20.1

39. Oklahoma                        20.7

40. Montana                             20.9

41. Tennessee                        21.3

42. South Carolina                  22.0

43. Arkansas                             22.6

44. New Mexico                          22.7

45. Alaska                               23.5

46. Alabama                             23.6

47. Missouri                             23.9

48. Wyoming                        25.9

49. Louisiana                            26.3

50. Mississippi                       28.6

 

Obviously, 13 of the 14 bloodiest states are red, which should tell you something about blaming “Democrat-run cities.”

 

Why not blame “Republican-run states?”

Monday, March 28, 2022

November 17, 2020: Don't Be an Ill-Informed Doofus

 

11/17/20: Chris Krebs, the head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) at the Department of Homeland Security continues to stand by this statement: “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised,” during the recent election

 

In fact, CISA has continued to update a website exposing what it calls election-related “rumors.”

 

Most have been trumpeted by Lame Duck Don.



Mr. Krebs.


 

For example, could some rigged computer software program steal all kinds of Trump votes and give them to Biden?

 

CISA explains:

 

The vast majority of votes cast in this election will be cast on paper ballots or using machines that produce a paper audit trail, which allow for tabulation audits to be conducted from the paper record in the event any issues emerge with the voting system software, audit logs, or tabulation.


 

What about dead people voting by the tens of thousands?

 

“Election officials regularly remove deceased individuals from voter registration rolls based on death records shared by state vital statistics agencies and the Social Security Administration,” CISA notes. “In other instances, a voting-age child with the same name and address as their deceased parent could be misinterpreted as a deceased voter” casting a ballot, “or lead to clerical errors.” 

 

What about vote totals for president in some districts that are higher than vote totals for down-ballot races? Is this proof that local officials are “padding” the vote for Joe Biden?

 

Nope. CISA explains that voters typically vote for most of the top offices on any ticket, president, senators, governors in requisite years. They may skip voting for school board candidates or judges about whom they know nothing.


 

Was it true that the Department of Homeland Security was monitoring for counterfeit ballots?

 

No.


 

What about this particular rumor? “If results as reported on election night change over the ensuing days or weeks, the process is hacked or compromised, so I can’t trust the results.”

 

Don’t be stupid! CISA lays out the obvious:

 

In fact, no state requires that official results be certified on election night itself. Fluctuations in unofficial results reporting will occur during and after election night as more ballots are processed and counted, often including military and overseas ballots, and validated provisional ballots. Variations in state processes may also mean ballots cast through different methods (e.g., early in-person voting, mail-in voting, and election day voting) are counted and unofficially reported in different orders. Official results are released after rigorous canvassing (verification) and certification by local and state election officials.

 


How about this: An observer for Team Trump saw an official in (name a state) filling in ballots for Biden!

 

Not really what was happening:

 

Some ballots cannot be read by a ballot scanner due to issues such as damage or misprinting. Some jurisdictions hand count such ballots, while others create duplicate ballots so they can be read by a ballot scanner. Some jurisdictions permit election officials to enhance markings on ballots that are too faint to scan following a process to adjudicate the voter’s intent based on state law. In jurisdictions where duplication of unscannable ballots is permitted, election officials duplicate the ballot precisely to ensure all the voter’s choices are transferred correctly to the new ballot. Both the original and duplicate ballot are labeled and logged so that the two ballots can be tracked and audited. Many jurisdictions require bipartisan teams of two or four personnel to complete this process and verify that votes are accurately transferred to duplicated ballots.

 


If you like, you can go to the website, yourself, particularly if you are an ill-informed doofus. It might help

 

A few more examples should suffice.

 

True or false: A malicious actor can easily defraud an election by printing and sending in extra mail-in ballots?

 

False, you dolts!

 

“Security measures meant to weed out fake ballots include signature matching, bar codes, water marks, and even precise paper weights.”

 


Finally, what about those dirty rats in Arizona who gave Trump voters black Sharpies to mark their ballots! What about that? They marked their ballots proudly, but machines couldn’t read the marks!

 

Okay. Nope.

 

Election jurisdictions allow voters to mark ballots with varying types of writing instruments, based on state law and other considerations such as tabulation system requirements. Poll workers are required to provide approved writing devices to voters.

 

Although felt-tip pens, like Sharpies, may bleed through ballots, some election officials have stated that ballot tabulation equipment in their jurisdictions can still read these ballots. Many jurisdictions even design their ballots with offset columns to prevent any potential bleed through from impacting the ability to easily scan both sides of ballots. 

 

If a ballot has issues that impact its ability to be scanned, it can be hand counted or duplicated, or adjudicated by election officials, who use defined procedures such as chain of custody to ensure protect [sic] ballot secrecy and integrity. Many states additionally have “voter intent” laws that allow for ballots to be counted even when issues such as bleed-throughs or stray marks are present, as long as the voter’s intent can still be determined.

 


*

 

IN ONE of the least surprising developments since the election was held and the votes were tallied, President Trump has a hissy-fit and fires Krebs for saying that the election was not rigged.

 


*

 

A desire to make sure election results can be trusted.

 

Then, a “big victory” for Trump. In Trump’s words. In reality, a puny victory, or no victory at all.

 

Election officials in Clark County, Nevada (one of the states the president insists he won with ease, but didn’t) announce they cannot call one race with confidence. Ross Miller, the Democratic candidate for a seat on the County Commission from District C, appears to have defeated Stavros Anthony by 10 votes – out of 153,000 cast. But 139 ballots have discrepancies.


 

Trump tweets exultantly,  

 

Big victory moments ago in the State of Nevada. The all Democrat County Commissioner race, on the same ballot as President, just thrown out because of large scale voter discrepancy. Clark County officials do not have confidence in their own election security. Major impact!

 


Really, it can be mind-boggling to see all the idiot sh*t this president will tweet. First, he’s too dumb to see that Democratic officials are holding up a victory for one of their own – indicating a desire to make sure election results can be trusted.

 

Second, Trump is too dumb to understand percentages. Even if all 139 discrepancies are found to be votes that don’t count, or even if all of them go to Miller, that’s an error rate of .009 percent.

 

Minimal impact, Tangerine Fool.


 

 

POSTSCRIPT: We regret to inform our readers, but Team Trump has canceled a planned campaign where celebrities would discuss COVID-19. The original cost was estimated to be $300 million. Celebrities would do their best to help ordinary Americans in “defeating despair” over the rampant spread of virus.

 

One contract, for $15 million to Atlas Research, had drawn close scrutiny, since Atlas was run by a business partner of HHS spokesman Michael Caputo, and tasked with lining up actual celebrities to speak.

 

It turned out, most celebrities had no interest in shilling for the Trump administration and telling the American people, basically, “Hey, it’s not as bad as you think, and President Trump is doing a great job! Even if people keep dying every day, by the hundreds.”

 

Total number of public service ads actually run, before the campaign was shelved: zero. Yes. Zero.

 


BLOGGER’S NOTE: As for that contested race in Nevada, Stavros, the Republican candidate, asks for and deserves a recount.

 

In the end, Miller’s margin of victory increases to 15. Trump, for some reason, does not tweet out the sad news.