Showing posts with label Steve Mnuchin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Mnuchin. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

November 8, 2017: Even the Secretary of the Treasury is Dodging Paying Taxes

 11/8/17: Trump fans will swear this is “Fake News,” but British papers are digging into 13.4 million leaked files from Appleby, a powerhouse law firm operating out of Bermuda. Nicknamed the “Paradise Papers,” they provide insight into the sleazy world of total tax avoidance. Guess which famous Brit has cash stashed in offshore accounts where avoiding taxes is key? 

The Queen!!                                        

____________________ 

The Treasury Secretary of these United States is stashing cash overseas in a gambit to dodge taxes.

____________________ 

 

As far as this country goes, 31,000 Americans hold Appleby accounts. All are working hard (or paying their lawyers to work hard) to avoid paying any taxes at all, while also covering their tracks. 

Who might some of these evaders be? We mentioned one yesterday (see: 11/7/17). Let’s add to our list. Working hard to avoid taxes we have Gary Cohn, Trump’s chief economic adviser; Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. That’s right! The Treasury Secretary of these United States is stashing cash overseas in a gambit to dodge taxes. (See: 6/29/19 for more detail.)


Where do you stash your cash?

Thursday, May 5, 2022

September 15, 2019: Fake News and My Fake Eardrums

 

9/15/19: President Fire and Fury is hoping some punk will make his day, like Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry, only with Stealth bombers.

 

____________________ 

Locked and loaded: Make my day.

____________________

 

 

Someone has attacked Saudi Arabia’s oil refineries. That someone could be Iran. Or that someone could be Houthi rebels, fighting Saudi forces in Yemen. The Houthis are backed by Iran. 

Dirty Don decides to address possible military action in a tweet: 

Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked. There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!




Did Dirty Don just say he was going to attack Iran once the Saudis laid out the terms for that attack? 

The Saudis? 

The guys who hacked up a journalist with bone saws and couldn’t tell us how that happened or why? 

The purveyors of Wahhabism, the most militant brand of Islam in the world? 

And weren’t the Saudis going to buy hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. war-fighting tools and technology? 

Why can’t they do the fighting themselves – or at least pay us handsomely to get our young men and women (but no Trumps) killed – as once suggested by a brilliant tactician named Donald J. Trump:


 

Citizen Trump, in 2014 and 2015, was clear when faulting Mr. Obama’s strategy in the Middle East. He’d be willing to send troops into harm’s way, but NO FREEBIES. The Saudis could sit back and watch us do their fighting – as Trumps always sit back during wartime, themselves. 

It would cost them, as Trump made clear in a number of tweets: 

Have you been watching how Saudi Arabia has been taunting our VERY dumb political leaders to protect them from ISIS. Why aren’t they paying?

 

I just want to know how much is Saudi Arabia and others who we are helping willing to pay for our saving from total extinction. Pay up now!

 

Tell Saudi Arabia and others that we want (demand!) free oil for the next ten years or we will not protect their private Boeing 747s. Pay up! 

 

If Saudi Arabia, which has been making one billion dollars a day from oil, wants our help and protection, they must pay dearly! NO FREEBIES.

 

Saudi Arabia should be paying the United States many billions of dollars for our defense of them. Without us, gone!

 

Oh, and Trump wants it to be clear. He’s no fool. He never said he’d meet with the leader of Iran, “without conditions.”

 

Once again, he tries performing delicate diplomacy via a tweet: “The Fake News is saying that I am willing to meet with Iran, ‘No Conditions.’ That is an incorrect statement (as usual!).” 

This is probably confusing to: 

1.     Iranians

2.     Saudis

3.     U.S. allies

4.     U.S. military

5.     Houthi rebels

6.     Secretary of State Pompeo

7.     Treasury Secretary Mnuchin 

– and – 

8.     “Fake News” reporters. 

 

That confusion would relate to the fact that Mnuchin told “Fake News” reporters last Tuesday, “Now the president has made clear, he is happy to take a meeting [with Iran] with no preconditions, but we are maintaining the maximum pressure campaign.” 

Then Secretary Pompeo added to the dilemma by saying, “The president has made clear he is happy to take a meeting with no preconditions.” 

In fact, this “Fake Blogger” was so confused by all the “Fake News,” apparently a result of relying on “Fake Eardrums,” that he decided to check some non-fake news sources, such as The Times of Israel. 

Yeah, Mnuchin and Pompeo said that. 

Indeed, as USA Today and many other news outlets report, Trump said that, too, and said it “repeatedly.”

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

January 3, 2020: Trump Toys with Starting a War with Iran

 

1/3/20: On the third day of a new year, the president decides it might be fun to provoke a war with Iran.




 

____________________ 

Idiocy has been a guiding principle.

____________________

  

With that, he orders a drone strike that kills a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani, a man known to have organized numerous attacks against U.S. forces over the last decade and more. 

Whether or not this was wise or ill-advised we will know only as events unfold. We do know it was risky. And if we look at Trump’s “thinking” on the subject of Iran over the last few years, we come away knowing that idiocy has been a guiding principle. Donald J. Trump’s tenuous grasp on the complexities and realities of foreign relations bodes ill for the future. 

Take, for example, this tweet in September 2011. “The Iranians have just threatened to send warships to our coasts. They laugh at us. We can’t allow them to develop nuclear weapons.” 

Trump wanted to make President Obama sound as if he were weak. But Iran never sent warships “to our coasts.” Nor was there any proof that they intended or even had the capacity to do so.

 

We had this Trump tweet that October: “Why aren’t we getting any oil from Iraq before we leave? We are leaving the country wide open for Iran. Big mistake.”  

Yes, big mistake to leave Iraq open for Iran! 

Since the drone strike that killed Soleimani was carried out while he was on Iraqi soil, Iraq’s parliament has voted to expel all 5,200 U.S. troops in their country. That would be “leaving the country wide open for Iran.”

 

* 

TRUMP HAS made it a habit to offer up bold Twitter predictions, almost all of which prove baseless. Our current president repeatedly said his predecessor would attack Iran to insure his reelection. 

11/14/11: @BarackObama will attack Iran in the not too distant future because it will help him win the election. 

 

10/9/12: Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.

 

9/16/13: I predict that President Obama will at some point attack Iran in order to save face!

 

In those days, when all Trump had to do was punch a few buttons on his phone which, come to think of it, is all he really does now he was sure, if he were in charge, he could quickly resolve any problem. “How far has the United States gone down when we are reduced to accept the imbecilic deal just agreed to with Iran,” he tweeted in November 2013. 

Obama, he said, should have, “Read THE ART OF THE DEAL!” 

In February 2014, Citizen Trump offered up another heaping helping of stupidity. “Do you think [Sec. of State] John Kerry is aware of the fact that they are building nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea and Pakistan already has them!!” 

First, we should note that the Iranians never built a single nuclear weapon while Obama and Kerry were in charge. 

Second, North Korea produced its first nuclear weapons during the years Bush 43 was in office. Everyone who could read a newspaper knew that. 

Third, North Korea has continued to expand its nuclear arsenal in the years Trump has been in the White House. 

Fourth, Pakistan started its nuclear weapons program in the 1970s and announced it had nukes in 1998.

 

* 

IN THOSE DAYS, Trump could tweet about how everything would be better if he were in charge. 

2/23/15: The talks between the U.S. and Iran are going on forever, WORLD’S LONGEST NEGOTIATION. Obama has no idea what he is doing - incompetent!

 

3/31/15: Via @FoxNewsInsider as seen on @foxandfriends: “Trump: Iran Nuke Talks Should Have Taken One Day”

 

Yes! Obama should have worked out an Iran deal in one day. You wonder why Trump’s not getting a deal done with Iran in the next 24 hours. 

Or the last 24. 

Citizen Trump kept attacking: 

4/1/15: Obama’s offer to Iran will not stop Iran’s breakout capability. It is a bad, desperate deal negotiated from weakness. Pass sanctions!

 

So, let’s be clear, clearer, clearest. Nuclear weapons produced by Iran during Obama’s eight years in office: 

0.

* 

DONALD J.’S grasp of the issues never went deeper than what he might spew in a tweet. There’s no evidence since he took office that his grasp of important matters is any more nuanced. 

For instance: 

8/11/15: The #IranDeal is a catastrophe that must be stopped. Will lead to at least partial world destruction & make Iran a force like never before.

 

Yet, we know the following countries and organizations signed on to the deal worked out by the Obama administration. They believed it would keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons until at least 2025: 

China 

European Union 

France 

Germany 

Russia  

United Kingdom 

Now that Trump has backed out of the deal the Iranians have said they will begin breaching treaty limits and produce as much nuclear fuel as they like.

 

*


Hiroshima after being hit by an atomic bomb.

All discussions of nuclear war should be conducted by serious individuals.

Not Twitter dopes.




WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP it’s impossible to tell where he stands on basic policy. Does he, for instance, care what happens to the people of the Middle East? Or does he only care about oil? When he first took office, Trump was on an anti-Muslim crusade. His base was terrified. They believed Obama was a Muslim. All the Muslims in the world were out to kill us! 

 

Many refugees from these countries were Christians. 

So, we had to block immigration entirely from the Muslim world. Trump tweeted simplistic warning: 

2/12/17: 72% of refugees admitted into U.S. (2/3 -2/11) during COURT BREAK-DOWN [the federal courts had blocked a travel ban implemented by the Trump administration] are from 7 countries: SYRIA, IRAQ, SOMALIA, IRAN, SUDAN, LIBYA & YEMEN

 

Our newly-elected president should have known that many refugees from these countries were Christians. Many were Muslims, but had worked for the U.S. military. That made them unpopular in their own countries. They sought safety in America, a nation they helped during the war. 

Eventually, he realized that not all Muslims were bad. He decided he liked Iranians if they protested against their government: 

12/31/17: Big protests in Iran. The people are finally getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered on terrorism. Looks like they will not take it any longer. The USA is watching very closely for human rights violations!

 

Of course, under Trump administration policies, if any leaders of those protests might need to flee to avoid arrest or execution, they would not be welcome as refugees in this country.

 

* 

WHAT ABOUT OBAMA? When it came to dealing with Iran, Trump wanted us to know that Obama was weak and pathetic. 

Trump was a stud: 

7/8/18: Iranian Harassment of U.S. Warships: 2015: 22 [incidents] 2016: 36 2017: 14 2018: 0 Source: @USNavy

 

And with Trump you got bluster. In July 2018 he hit the caps button and started shouting at the Iranians via Twitter. 

To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS! 

 

Tweeting, of course, is not the same as conducting diplomacy. So, you had to wonder when Trump was going to get around to working out that “one day” deal with Iran. That was the one he promised he could pull off if he were president. (Kind of like he said “repeal and replace” would be easy.) 

Trump kept insisting that Iran was behind all kinds of trouble in the Middle East. For once, he was right. Well, then, what better way to stand up to Iran than to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria! 

And to make that decision to withdraw so suddenly that the U.S. commander in the region said he was caught by surprise.

 

Which meant Trump had to tweet on the topic: 

Getting out of Syria was no surprise. I’ve been campaigning on it for years, and six months ago, when I very publicly wanted to do it, I agreed to stay longer. Russia, Iran, Syria & others are the local enemy of ISIS. We were doing there work. Time to come home & rebuild. #MAGA

 

At last, we were bringing our troops home! 

Or not. 

Trump almost immediately reversed course and said he was sending most of the troops he was pulling out of Syria to Iraq, and then sent several hundred U.S. troops to eastern Syria to guard the oil. That’s a key consideration in Trump foreign policy. He likes oil. He wants to keep oil. He wants oil to be safe. He likes oil way more than he likes actual people. 

There were reports in May 2019 that Trump wouldn’t listen to advisers. He was too lazy to dive into details of foreign policy. He was too impatient to listen to briefings. He was too incurious to ask questions. 

 

Trump talks (stupidly) about nuclear war. 

These stories riled him up and he turned defensive: 

5/15/19: ....Different opinions are expressed [in cabinet meetings] and I make a decisive and final decision - it is a very simple process. All sides, views, and policies are covered. I’m sure that Iran will want to talk soon.

 

That prediction also proved incorrect; but more bluster followed: 

5/19/19: If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again!

 

(See also: “Fire and fury” for North Korea.) 

We even heard Trump say he could end the war in Afghanistan in ten days if he killed 10 million Afghans. 

(Technically, since he was threatening nuclear holocaust, we should point out that any madman could end a war in ten days, assuming he was willing to wipe entire populations from the surface of the earth.) 

Trump’s tweets often sounded juvenile: 

6/2/19: Hearing word that Russia, Syria and, to a lesser extent, Iran, are bombing the hell out of Idlib Province in Syria, and indiscriminately killing many innocent civilians. The World is watching this butchery. What is the purpose, what will it get you? STOP!

 

The Iranians were not dissuaded by a Twitter shout. An attack was launched on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia. On June 13, Trump had to admit, “‘It is the assessment of the U.S. government that Iran is responsible for today’s attacks in the Gulf of Oman....’ @StateDept @SecPompeo.” 

Nine days later, he ordered air strikes after the Iranians shot down a U.S. drone. At the last minute, he aborted the mission. 

Time for Twitter excuses. First, it wasn’t his fault he couldn’t get a deal with Iran. It was still Obama’s fault, even though he left office on January 20, 2017. 

Iran cannot have Nuclear Weapons! Under the terrible Obama plan, they would have been on their way to Nuclear in a short number of years, and existing verification is not acceptable. We are putting major additional Sanctions on Iran on Monday. 

 

Then we had this head-scratcher. “I never called the strike against Iran ‘BACK,’ as people are incorrectly reporting,” Trump howled. “I just stopped it from going forward at this time!” 

The vague phrase “a short number of years” was of course telling. The signatories to the deal had agreed that Iran would not produce weapons-grade nuclear materials before 2025. And international inspectors would check up on the Iranians until 2030. By comparison, Kim Jong-un and the North Koreans have accelerated nuclear production since Trump took office. 

In other words, nuclear diplomacy is hard. Harder than “One Day Deal” Donald ever imagined. 

That meant threats would have to suffice: 

7/3/19: Iran has just issued a New Warning. Rouhani says that they will Enrich Uranium to ‘any amount we want’ if there is no new Nuclear Deal. Be careful with the threats, Iran. They can come back to bite you like nobody has been bitten before!

 

Iran responded by threatening U.S. naval vessels in the Persian Gulf, whereas Trump had often said before that such threats during Obama’s time in office proved that Obama was not respected: 

7/18/19: I want to apprise everyone of an incident in the Strait of Hormuz today, involving #USSBoxer, a U.S. Navy amphibious assault ship. The BOXER took defensive action against an Iranian drone....

 

Next, we had Trump lying. “The Fake News is saying that I am willing to meet with Iran, ‘No Conditions.’ That is an incorrect statement (as usual!).” 

 

As it turned out, the “Fake News” people were only reporting what Secretary of State Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin had said. Trump would meet with the Iranians without preconditions.

 

* 

FINALLY, in December 2019, Iranian proxy forces in Iraq launched a mortar attack on a U.S. base. The U.S. retaliated with airstrikes on bases controlled by pro-Iranian militias inside Iraq. 

On December 31, Trump tweeted: 

Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will. Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible. In addition, we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!

 

....Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities. They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!

 

Ah, that incongruous: “Happy New Year.” 

So Trumpian.

 

Finally, the president ordered the drone strike and Soleimani was killed. This meant it was time to tweet-praise himself. Where other presidents had failed, he had not failed. Trump was the best! 

The United States has paid Iraq Billions of Dollars a year, for many years. That is on top of all else we have done for them. The people of Iraq don’t want to be dominated & controlled by Iran, but ultimately, that is their choice. Over the last 15 years, Iran has gained more.... 

 

...and more control over Iraq, and the people of Iraq are not happy with that. It will never end well! 

 

General Qassem Soleimani has killed or badly wounded thousands of Americans over an extended period of time, and was plotting to kill many more...but got caught! He was directly and indirectly responsible for the death of millions of people, including the recent large number....

 

....of PROTESTERS killed in Iran itself. While Iran will never be able to properly admit it, Soleimani was both hated and feared within the country. They are not nearly as saddened as the leaders will let the outside world believe. He should have been taken out many years ago!

 

First, a minor note, but one that goes to the heart of how Trump communicates. How he came up with the idea that General Soleimani was “responsible for the death of millions of people,” no one can know.

 

And, as always, in this tweet, we learn that the problems Trump faced were created by his predecessors, not by decisions of his own. Gen. Soleimani “should have been taken out years ago.” 

Trump decided to issue more threats. On January 4, he warned that the U.S. military had already: 

....targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!

 

They attacked us, & we hit back. If they attack again, which I would strongly advise them not to do, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before!

 

At this point, Trump was barking out his ass. By treaty, the nations of the world have agreed that attacks on cultural sites are war crimes.

 

Secretary of Defense Esper had no choice but to come out and tell reporters that the U.S. would carry out only lawful attacks. 

Next, Secretary of State Pompeo showed up on TV and said Trump wasn’t going to order airstrikes on cultural targets even though the president said he would. Pompeo insisted that the real threat to Persian culture came from the ayatollahs in charge which was partly true. He did not care to explain how Trump’s threat to blow Persian culture to bits might appeal to the average Iranian in the street.

 

 

Stupidity, the essence of the Trump presidency. 

Last, but not least, on January 5, we had Trump at his most clueless, talking about war as if he were playing a video game. 

Here we have pure stupidity, the essence of the Trump presidency, boiled down in one tweet: 

The United States just spent Two Trillion Dollars on Military Equipment. We are the biggest and by far the BEST in the World! If Iran attacks an American Base, or any American, we will be sending some of that brand new beautiful equipment their way...and without hesitation!

 

No war has ever been fought by “beautiful equipment.” And Trump was blithely talking about killing and maiming human beings. 

How many Iranians might die, there was no way of knowing. 

Other human beings, Americans, would carry the burden of the fight. They too could be killed and maimed. You might have thought the President of the United States would take this matter more seriously.

 

Within hours of that vacuous tweet, militant Islamist forces attacked a U.S. base in Kenya. One U.S. soldier, 23-year-old Henry “Mitch” Mayfield Jr., and two Department of Defense contractors were killed. U.S. commanders said the attack by the al-Shabaab terrorist group, a first in Kenya, involved “indirect and small arms fire.” Six contractor-operated, civilian aircraft were damaged. 

My son was a great man and we love him and we’re going to miss him,” his father Henry Mayfield, told an ABC reporter the next day. 

That’s not “beautiful equipment,” by the way.

Monday, April 18, 2022

January 29, 2020: GDP Growth in 2019 Was 2.3 Percent - Federal Deficit Grows 50 Percent

 

1/29/20: The final numbers are in and the White House decides to brag: Gross Domestic Production (GDP) for 2019 increased by 2.3 percent. This was down from 2.9 percent growth in 2018; but still somehow reason to boast. Deficit spending, of course, has been a boost, with $1 trillion more spent during Fiscal Year 2019 than the federal government took in. 

Meanwhile, Secretary of Alchemy Steven Mnuchin promises that he and Trump have been right all along. Yes, Mnuchin promised Trump’s tax cuts would pay for themselves. No, they haven’t. Yes, the deficit has risen by 50%. Don’t worry. The tax cuts will pay for themselves! Soon. Like in…two more years. If we wait two more years and reelect Trump the magic will begin. 

If deficits continue to pile up, as the Congressional Budget Office predicts, the U.S. will eventually end up in a debt crisis, like Greece.



 

* 

THE U.S. POPULATION continues to gray. Barring a pandemic, as the trend continues, the strain on Medicare and Medicaid will begin to buckle the system. With the focus on the Iowa caucuses and the coming presidential election, The New York Times notes that Iowa is one of 27 states where the population over age 60 is growing and the population under 60 is shrinking. 

The number of Americans 65 years old and older is expected to nearly double, from 52 million in 2018 to 95 million by 2060. (This blogger expects to be dead by then. So, he doesn’t care; but his grandchildren will.) 

At that point, nearly 1 in 4 Americans, 23%, will be seniors. That means, if we keep piling up debt now, the next generations will be left with nothing more than giant piles of IOU’s signed, most recently, by Donald J. Trump and his Tea Party-Oh-Never-Mind Republican pals.


Saturday, July 14, 2018

Trump is Winning the Imaginary War on Coal


AS A FORMER HISTORY TEACHER, I try to stick to proven facts on my blog. For example, I rarely quote Democratic politicians when I’m mocking President Trump. That would be like shooting obese orange fish in a puddle.

If you want to make fun of Trump, facts always suffice.

So, today, I thought it might be fun to consider the gory “War on Coal,” declared, as near I can tell, by Muslim Obama.

Luckily, right-wingers have Trump and all the other freedom fighters at Fox News to save our coal and also save our tinsel in the equally terrible, “War on Christmas.” 

That war was also declared by President Barack Hussein (“Did We Mention He’s A Muslim”) Obama.

By the way, if you believe in facts and not in Santa Claus, Obama isn’t a Muslim

And if you truly believed in equality, you might have the sense to know it wouldn’t matter if he was.

But today’s focus is not on Muslims, or liberals who want to kill and eat Donner and Blizten! Today, we are focusing on the “War on Coal!” If we can go back to the days of St. Ronald of Reagan, we know for sure there were no Muslims in the Oval Office and we can be equally sure that coal miners had a friend in the White House. Okay, maybe not a friend of coal miners’ unions.

Whatever! Lets move on.

At least, St Ronald never declared war on coal. Bureau of Labor Statistics (which only go back to 1985 on the chart I can find) show that in January 1985 there were 170,500 coal miners at work in this great country.

Under Obama, that number fell to 50,700 in January 2017, that dirty bastard! Hey, did the right-wingers mention lately, he was born in Kenya????

So: BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, Obama.

Machinery replaced men with picks and shovels.


LET’S PUT UP A FEW MORE NUMBERS to shed some real light on your typical Fox News talking point. By January 1989, when Reagan’s second term ended, only 136,400 coal miners were still at work. That meant there had been a loss of 34,100 jobs in the mines; but this was not a war on coal. 

Nope.

Reagan loved miners. Obama hated them because he was a communist, not to mention a Muslim.

I know. That combination doesn’t make sense; but we are employing Fox News logic here and we are focusing on the “War on Coal!”

Luckily, America elected another Republican, George H. W. Bush in 1988. By January 1993, when he left office, the number of coal miners hard at work had risen…I mean, fallen…to 112,400.

Scratch another 24,000 coal mining jobs.

Next came Bill Clinton. By the time he finished his eight years in office, having chased Monica Lewinsky around the Oval Office until she was dizzy, only 71,300 coal miners remained. That meant another 41,100 jobs lost, not as bad as the combined jobs lost in the eight previous years under Republican leadership.

Still, if you were a miner, the trend lines really sucked; and as a good liberal, my sympathies always go to the working stiffs.

Under George W. Bush, coal mining rebounded, and everything was great in America again. Well, not counting when the entire economy crashed in 2008. You remember that great time—when the economy shed 3,889,000 jobs between February 2008 and the end of January 2009. 

Of course, fracking hadn’t caught on and the price of natural gas wasn’t undercutting the price of coal yet. From January 2001 through January 2009, jobs in the coal mines rose to 86,400. So that would be a gain of fifteen thousand plus.

Then came the “War on Coal,” launched for nefarious, flag-hating, un-American reasons by tree-hugging libtards, led by Commie Obama, or Muslim Obama, take your right-wing pick. 

And three years later, even with a recession to wrestle, coal mining jobs had increased to 89,700. In other words, Obama had declared war on coal and then coal jobs, for three years, still increased.

Only then did the decline set in again.

When President Obama left office in January 2017, only 50,700 coal mining jobs remained. That meant in his eight years in office, 35,700 coal miners died in bloody imaginary warfare, compared to 58,100 miners wiped out during St. Ronald of Reagan’s second term and George H. W. Bush’s single term.



IN OTHER WORDS, if you cared about facts, you had to ask: Did St. Ronald of Reagan hate coal miners himself?

I wasn’t able to find Bureau of Labor Statistics charts for the years before 1985; but this chart from WikiCommons makes clear the grim historical trends. The scale makes it hard to read. But it would appear there were roughly 250,000 coal miners at work in January 1981, when St. Ronald took charge.

And that would make him by far the biggest killer of coal mining jobs (roughly 115,000 during his two terms) in the last forty years.

The reality—if you have at least one eyeball that functions and you do more than stare at the leggy babes on Fox News—there never has been a “war” on coal. The trends  for decades, including the decline of the United Mine Workers, which Republicans have always cheered, have been running strongly against the miners and the miners’ families. The trends have been crippling states where mining once supported towns and entire counties and provided good-paying employment to those who preferred not to go to college and get degrees in teaching or engineering or computer science.

But if you had tried to blame Obama for a “War on Buggies,” your argument would make about as much sense.

There was no “War on Coal.” There wasnt even a skirmish. 

Harsh economic changes were at work. Improved machinery and methods of extraction killed hundreds of thousands of mining jobs, starting a century ago. Changes in mining methods—from deep mining to hilltop leveling—killed tens of thousands more. And the decline in demand for coal has meant the elimination of many jobs that remained. The prices of solar power and natural gas have both fallen dramatically in recent years. And no president, not St. Ronald, not Obama, and not the big orange blimp in the White House today, is going to be able to turn back an this unfortunate historical clock.

You knew, for example, that coal was in terrible trouble, not because of President Obama, but because of changing realities when the Kentucky Coal Museum installed eighty solar panels on its roof in 2017.

Again, there never was any “War on Coal.” 

You couldnt win it because it wasnt being fought. It was more like a “War on Reality” waged by Trump and Fox News.

*

Has there been a slight uptick in jobs under Donald J. Trump. I mean for coal miners, not lawyers to defend him in court?

Yes. We now have 53,200 miners at work, a bump up of 2,500.

By contrast, the U.S. Department of Energy reported last year that there were 373,807 people working in the solar energy field. (See page 29 of the DOE report.) So, you could argue, if you wished to distort economics that President Trump declared “War on the Sun” when he imposed tariffs on imported Chinese solar panels earlier this year.

To understand how bogus the “War on Coal”  has always been all you really have to do is look at the facts.

And try to think.


POSTSCRIPT: AS A GUY WHO SUPPORTS good pay for workers, I understand exactly why coal miners are mad.

As a liberal, I wish they’d all unionize tomorrow (only about 3 percent are unionized today) and strike for better wages and benefits the next day. 

I wish a lot of workers would unionize and fight for higher pay. I wish the average coal miner, the average teacher, the average butcher, the average baker (whether or not he wants to bake a cake for the gay couple), the average candlestick maker, the average police officer, carpenter, plumber, electrician and teamster would all unionize next week and go on strike nationwide next month.

I wish the billionaires didn’t dominate the economy. I’d be happy if they all stopped hiding their money in secret offshore accounts. 

I wish the billionaires werent able, particularly in the wake of the Citizens United court decision (decided, 5-4, by the conservatives justices on the U.S. Supreme Court), to buy up politicians wholesale, like purchasing a quart of milk and a carton of eggs.

I wish guys like Wilbur Ross, our current Commerce Secretary, and Steve Mnuchin, our current Treasury Secretary, didn’t park their dough in places like the Cayman Islands, out of reach of the IRS. 

I wish they didnt dodge taxes which the rest of us pay.

Last, but not least, I wish the president would release his taxes (apparently under audit for all eternity) so we could find out the truth. Is that chunky fat cat paying as much, percentage-wise, as the average coal miner?

At least the miner who still has a job?