Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

November 5, 2017: Only One GOP Candidate for President Since 1992 Likes Trump (Not Counting Trump)

 

11/5/17: Conservative friends on Facebook seem increasingly out of sorts as I continue my crusade to mock their boy Don every day, so long as he shall remain president of these United States. 

 

The political equivalent of the Bataan Death March. 

Allow me to quote a few “non-liberal” sources to bolster my point on Day 290 of the Trump presidency, a presidency which has been the political equivalent of the Bataan Death March. George H. W. Bush recently revealed he voted for Hillary. Trump is a “blowhard,” he said. George W., next in the GOP line, voted the straight Republican ticket but left a blank at the top. Mitt Romney said Trump was totally unfit for high office and you can add John McCain to the list of “Trump haters.” That means the GOP nominees for president in 1988, 1992, 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2012 are on record as objecting to this objectionable human being. John Kasich, Bob Corker, Colin Powell and Robert Mueller have all been Republicans longer than the president. None like Trump. Bob Dole, bucking the tide, praised Trump’s “strong leadership” in July. 

 

POSTSCRIPT: How is the Mueller investigation going? Sen. McCain told a reporter, “It’s like a centipede. There’s always another shoe to drop.”



Bob Dole.



Monday, May 16, 2022

3/21/19: Hope Hicks to Turn Over Documents - While Trump Insults the Dead (Again)

 

3/21/19: President Twitter Thumbs drains another bitter cup of reality when he learns Hope Hicks, once affectionately referred to as “Hopee” and “the Hopester,” has agreed to turn over documents to Congress and cooperate with investigators. 

Her hometown newspaper explains why this could matter: 

Greenwich [Connecticut] native Hope Hicks has agreed to cooperate with the House Judiciary Committee’s wide-ranging probe of alleged misconduct in office by President Donald Trump.

 

Hicks was as close to Trump as any of his deputies [emphasis added], both prior to the election and afterwards up to her departure from the White House last year. The document request sent to Hicks earlier this month ran four pages long, asking the 30-year-old former model and Greenwich High School lacrosse team co-captain for information on a multitude of controversies involving her former boss.

 

Most crucial, perhaps, will be what Hicks reveals about a wildly misleading letter drafted in the summer of 2017, with her involvement, and that of President Trump and his son, Don Jr.

 

That letter was designed to obscure the purpose of the infamous June 2016 meeting between Trump campaign officers and agents of the Russian Federation. The meeting that looks and feels, and smells, and if you listen, sounds exactly like COLLUSION/CONSPIRACY. 

A false letter drafted to obscure the purpose would be the very stuff of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. 

(We are capitalizing like President Trump when he TWEETS.)

 

There are reports that Hicks kept a detailed diary of her work in the Trump White House, which could prove valuable for investigators. It is also rumored that Hicks, sometimes described as Trump’s “surrogate daughter,” has been offered as much as $10 million to write a tell-all.


Ms. Hicks leaving Air Force One.

 

* 

IN THE WAKE of President Trump’s most recent comments about Sen. John McCain, who died last August, fellow Vietnam War combat veteran and former U.S. Sen. Bob Kerry calls on Donald to get his feet x-rayed and “let’s see those bone spurs.” 

During a speech at the Lima Army Tank Plant in Ohio yesterday, Trump revisited his feud with McCain. “I gave him the kind of funeral he wanted which as president I had to approve,” Trump noted, as if he deserved credit for magnanimity. Then, he added, “I don’t care about this, I didn’t get [a] thank you, that’s OK.”  

A “thank you” for what? Displaying common decency? 

Current Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson called the president’s comments “deplorable.” Because Isakson still has a soul.

Saturday, April 2, 2022

September 6, 2020: Trump Has Trashed More Veterans than All Other Presidents Combined


THIS POST IS PART OF A SERIES, 9/5/20, 9/6/20 AND 9/7/20, BEST READ IN SEQUENCE.


9/6/20: The blogger was up early on Saturday, still disgusted – but frankly amazed – to have heard that the President of the United States made a habit of insulting veterans and the sacrifices they make.   

Could Trump be innocent? I don’t like the man in the least. Still. This was hard to believe. I started looking for information.



Vietnam War Memorial, Washington, D.C.

 

____________________ 

“Teach us to distrust and despise those clamorous patriots whose courage dwells but in the tongue.”

Washington Irving

____________________

  

Let’s be honest, though, even if we like Trump. If he called those who served in Vietnam “suckers,” as my older brother served, and as I volunteered to do as a Marine, it would be perfectly in character with who he was then and remains today . In my case, in the summer of 1969, I asked twice to be sent, but didn’t get sent. 

White privilege, I guess. My racist platoon sergeant sent a black guy the first time, instead. 

The second time, I changed my mind, after joining our battalion football team. So, off another African American went. I’m no hero; but I was willing to do my part. I’d even argue (as liberal as I am), that I’m ten times the patriot President Trump has ever been or ever will be. 

I even pay taxes.

 

At any rate, I quickly located an article about the president’s comments in Newsweek. There was a one-question poll at the end: Do you believe the president called U.S. soldiers “losers?” When I clicked, “Yes,” the percentages popped up. 

Yes:     66%. 

No:     29%. 

Don’t know:   5%.

 

* 

Trump is the limbo king when it comes to going low. 

AS I NOTED in Friday’s post, I’m a former history teacher. I would argue that history shows Trump is perfectly capable of stooping low enough to insult the World War I dead. He’s the limbo king of presidents. I also admit I don’t know for sure what was said. I wasn’t in the room to hear him speak. But we’ve all heard him talk, almost daily, for four years. We know he never hesitates to demean and dehumanize others, whether speaking of individuals or groups. 

I know his family history, which doesn’t help. 

It should not surprise anyone to know that no one in Donald’s direct line has ever served in uniform, not since Grandfather Friedrich came here from Germany in 1885. Grandpa never enlisted. The president’s father scorned service during World War II and never lent a hand in the fight. Young Donald proved, during the Vietnam War, that you can’t draft a Trump, no matter how hard you try.


Trump, of course, had already marched out for a press conference Friday afternoon. That’s the only kind of marching he’s ever done. As I puzzled over details Saturday, I realized he had done himself no favors when he spoke. In an effort to prove that he would never trash the troops, he had trashed Gen. John Kelly, a man who had served the nation for 43 years, and who reluctantly agreed to serve as Trump’s White House chief of staff in the summer of 2017. 

Kelly didn’t want that job. Who would? He agreed because he thought he could bring order to chaos in the White House. According to friends, he agreed to serve out of a sense of soldierly duty. 

I kept checking for information. I learned that no one had to draft Kelly to convince him to put on a uniform. In 1970, when he was 20, he enlisted in the Marines. He got lucky, as I did, and was released from active duty early, under a special program for Marines who wanted to go to college. 

Kelly was never shot at in Vietnam. 

He went back to school, graduated, and in 1975 rejoined the Marines, as a young second lieutenant. He rose steadily in the ranks, and was promoted to brigadier general while in Iraq. In April 2003 he led Task Force Tripoli north for an attack on Baghdad, and got shot at for real.


The blogger defends America in 1969, with a toilet brush.

 

* 

“They were not anonymous to her.” 

I STILL didn’t know, with military precision, what Trump had said about veterans behind closed doors. I do know he didn’t help his position Saturday, when he started howling about Jennifer Griffin, Fox News national security correspondent. Griffin defended her original reporting, which backed up the Goldberg story. Now she insisted she had “impeccable” sources. She noted that while her sources were “anonymous” for publication, they were not anonymous to her. She knew these men or women. They were credible witnesses who said they had heard what Trump said. Trump screamed even louder. He demanded, again, that she be fired. 

For good measure, he went two levels lower, referring to Goldberg as a “slimeball.” 

Later, he went lower still, calling reporters who were pursuing the story, and backing up Goldberg, “animals.” 

(Trump is no fan of the free press, repeatedly insisting that his critics should be fired. See, for example, Jemele Hill.)

 

I kept checking. At least seven Fox News journalists defended Griffin, citing her careful reporting in the past. “Jennifer Griffin is the kind of reporter we all strive to be like,” said one colleague. “She’s courageous, smart, ethical, fair and a class act. She’s earned the trust of viewers throughout a distinguished career and is credible.” 

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Illinois Republican who served with the Air Force in Afghanistan and Iraq, made it clear where he stood. “She’s one of my favorite reporters. Fair and unafraid,” he said of Griffin. 

I still didn’t “know” what Trump said in a room where I wasn’t present. And to be honest, I discounted most of what his defenders said. I’d argue that they are, generally speaking, as sorry a crew of bootlickers as ever graced the White House. Mick Mulvaney? Sarah Sanders? “Birther” McEnany? 

Please.

 

By far, the best defense of the president I saw on Saturday came from a veteran named Joe Kent. He’s a former U.S. Army officer, and a Gold Star husband. His wife Shannon was killed by a suicide bomber in Syria last year, while helping in the fight against ISIS. His pain, if you read his story, is palpable. The sacrifices his wife made – that he made – that their children made – are immense. 

I’d recommend a read. 

For a nearly mirror-opposite response, the story of Kelly Martin, a former Marine, and her partner Gunnery Sgt. Diego Ponga – also killed in combat – is equally good. 

I can’t image ever calling a man like Kent, or his deceased wife, a “sucker” for serving. But my problem is that I can imagine Trump. 

 

That’s exactly who the f**k Donald Trump is. 

I know, recently, what Trump did to a decorated combat veteran, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. He blocked a promotion the U.S. Army said Vindman had earned, because he could not forgive a hero, whose testimony under oath, called his behavior as president into question. Vindman had told a congressional panel he came forth to testify, out of a sense of duty. He warned that Trump had put U.S. security at risk by refusing timely military assistance to Ukraine. 

Vindman was never accused of perjury. But he was soon out, resigning from the army after 21 years. 

Roger Stone, who perjured himself to protect Trump, and earned seven felony convictions in the process, never put on the uniform. He still got a pardon from his pal. 

That’s who Trump is. That’s exactly who the f**k Donald Trump is. In any situation, if it’s to his benefit, he will go low.

 

What else led me to believe Trump could go as low as Goldberg and Griffin and others had reported? I also knew that in the fight against ISIS, in which Shannon Kent was killed, almost all the dead on our side were Kurds. We armed and trained them and backed them with air and artillery support. The Kurds did virtually all of the fighting on the ground, and lost an estimated 11,000 dead. Each lost warrior was no doubt as loved by their families as Shannon Kent by hers. When ISIS was crushed, President Trump bragged about what he had accomplished. 

Then he pulled U.S. forces out of Syria, almost on a whim. 

He allowed the Turks – historic and bitter enemies of the Kurds – to storm into Syria. He betrayed, by far, our most loyal allies in the region. Then he showed who he was and what he truly valued. He left 800 American soldiers behind, because, as he made repeatedly clear, he wanted some Syrian oil. “We’re keeping the oil,” Trump told an audience of police chiefs last October. “I’ve always said that keep the oil. We want to keep the oil, $45 million a month. Keep the oil. We’ve secured the oil.” If he had the oil, a lake of spilled Kurdish blood wouldn’t bother him a bit. 

Of course, he’d have no idea why Marines died in 1918. He’d never understand why pilots flew into danger in 1944 or 1967. He’d have no earthly idea why Gen. Kelly’s son was willing to fight and die in Afghanistan in 2010. All he will ever really understand is piling up cash.

 

* 

A fourth generation of no service to country. 

CAN I SAY, without a scintilla of doubt, that Trump did call Marines, buried in France, “losers?” I cannot, until anonymous sources come forth. I do know he screwed the Kurds and never looked back. I know what he has said about our closest allies, who have fought by our side. When he thought other NATO countries weren’t paying their fair share for defense, he denigrated their contributions. Never once did he salute the thousands of British, French, German, Italian, Canadian, and others, who were killed or wounded in Afghanistan after we were attacked on 9/11. Allied dead, alone, numbered 1,147. A total of 130,000 soldiers from fifty partner nations served there, so no Trump ever had to get bloody. 

Not Don Jr. 

Not Eric. 

Not Ivanka. 

And not Tiffany, the nicest Trump. 

A fourth generation of no service to country, at all.

 

Do I believe in my soul that Trump called dead U.S. troops “losers,” and referred to those who served in Vietnam as “suckers?” I do. I know he once suggested that avoiding STD’s was his “personal Vietnam.” Vaginas, he told radio Howard Stern, were “potential landmines” he might step on with bone spur feet. 

Having bragged about the many women he bedded, he added, “I feel like a great and very brave soldier.” 

Sadly, he probably did. 

I think I know exactly who Trump is – a terrible human being – not just a really terrible president. In the past, I listened to him torch Special Counsel Robert Mueller again and again, and question his love of country. Mueller, too, was a decorated combat veteran, who fought in Vietnam. He shed blood while Trump was limping around the ski slopes at Aspen, with sore feet.

 

Like most Americans, I was shocked when Trump trashed John McCain, and said a man who had been held prisoner for five years and tortured was no hero. At one point, he called McCain a “loser” because enemy gunners shot his jet out of the sky and said he liked people who “didn’t get shot down.” 

Then, this weekend, he denied he ever called McCain a “loser,” although the tapes showed he did. 

I was shocked again when he attacked the Gold Star mother of Captain Humayun Khan, who died in combat. Trump implied that her Muslim faith made her suspect, although her son’s faith didn’t keep him from fighting under our flag. 

And again, I was horrified when Trump picked a fight with Myeshia Johnson, a Gold Star widow, after her husband was killed during a fight against ISIS-backed forces in Niger, in 2017. 

I thought any of those attacks were proof enough that a man like Trump would go low at every chance, and go lower and lower again. 

 

“It’s just the way he speaks, he can sound like an asshole.” 

Nor am I alone in thinking as I do. Business Insider quoted two sources, supportive of the story in The Atlantic. One former senior White House official said comments attributed to Trump, in that article, clearly resembled his speech patterns, and were “consistent with who he is.” A second source agreed. “I’ve known Donald Trump. It sounds like him. They’re consistent with things that he’s said.” 

The Daily Beast also did some digging, and found eleven individuals willing to defend the president – in a weird sort of way. Had they ever heard him make callous comments about our troops? 

Well, yes. 

But that, they said, was because he hated the wars they had to fight, not the warriors. “The president means no disrespect to our troops; it’s just that the way he speaks, he can sound like an asshole sometimes,” one current senior administration official explained. “That’s how he is [when the cameras are off]… It’s his style.” 

I can agree with that. When I hear Trump speak, I almost always think: His style is to sound like an asshole.

 

Three of Trump’s defenders admitted that the story about Trump, at the graveside of Gen. Kelly’s dead son, rang true. Trump could be tactless, even when talking about those who had died since 9/11. “This,” The Daily Beast said sources told them, “included the president mentioning that their service in these war zones [Afghanistan and Iraq] was a ‘waste,’ or that U.S. military personnel in these conflicts had ‘died for nothing,’ or that the fallen ‘should have been doing something else.’” 

Yeah, “something else,” would have been good. 

Not dying comes to mind. 

 

POSTSCRIPT: Writing in the British newspaper, The Guardian, Robert McCrum admits his fiery love affair with America – with the promise of what America could be – has been banked, possibly forever. 

 

“An orange monster, half-clown, half-tyrant.” 

It saddens him, he explains, to have to “watch the disintegration of a great society under the leadership of an orange monster, half-clown, half-tyrant.” 

McCrum adds: 

I have always loved America for its language, the snap of Twain or Lincoln and the sonorities of Douglass and Melville. First and last, it’s a society built of words and ideas, those uplifting expressions of reason and the pursuit of happiness, that quest for “a more perfect union”, the new world’s dream.

 

Now the language is reduced to angry, semi-literate tweets, the vocabulary suitable for a sixth grader, the only happiness to be pursued being whatever makes the Narcissist-in-Chief smile.

September 7, 2020: Did Trump Insult Dead Marines?

 

THIS POST IS PART OF A SERIES, 9/5/20, 9/6/20 AND 9/7/20, BEST READ IN SEQUENCE.


9/7/20: Having gone golfing on Saturday, and having golfed avidly on Sunday, and having worked his Twitter thumbs to exhaustion (70 Twitter posts on Sunday, alone), Trump hunkered down at the White House on Labor Day. With nothing better to do, it struck him as a phenomenal idea to hold another press conference. All such conferences now are really lengthy diatribes against political opponents, and anyone else Donald feels like insulting that day.


 

____________________ 

John McCain liked wars. I will be a better warrior than anybody, but when we fight a war, we’re going to win them.” 

President Trump

____________________

 

 

The president’s overarching problem is that when he opens his mouth and words drip out in random order, an overwhelming majority of America’s assume he’s lying. In a Gallup poll earlier this summer, only 36% of respondents said they believed the president was “honest and trustworthy.” 

That number was elevated by the 72% of Republicans who believed, against all evidence, that the Easter Bunny was real.

 

News that the president had called dead Marines, killed during World War I, as “losers,” and referred to men and women who served in Vietnam “losers,” continued to dominate the news. I kept searching for insight. I found several brutal responses aimed at the president, and one defense. The latter was a letter signed by “about 674” veterans an odd phrase, I thought and shared with Breitbart on September 4. Signatories included at least three Medal of Honor recipients – and all respect to those brave men. 

That letter, however, seemed to indicate that minds had snapped shut like steel traps, without catching any facts. 

“Recent baseless media attacks against President Trump from anonymous sources,” the letter reads, “are just another example of the depths to which the President’s opponents are willing to descend to divide the nation and meddle in this election.”

 

So, was I wrong to believe Trump was capable of stooping so low? I could not help but notice that almost all the “denials” were focused on the visit to France in 2018. A great deal was being made of the president’s decision to skip the visit to the cemetery to pay respects to our fallen soldiers from World War I. The president’s defenders seemed to want to prove that safety concerns related to bad weather were why the president aborted the trip, not narcissism and worry about his hair. Aides insisted they had not heard him call the dead Marines “losers.” 

The problem with the “I didn’t hear it” defense is that it doesn’t prove Trump didn’t say what sources said he said. If four people say they heard it – and at least four anonymous sources say they did – then, if those sources would come forward, you could be nearly certain the president said what they said he said. 

I kept checking.

 

I found one tweet from a veteran, which I think adds great credence to my position, that Trump would be capable of going so low. It came from Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s brother, who had also run afoul of President Trump.


   

I would argue that the treatment of the two brothers proves almost beyond doubt that President Trump doesn’t have respect for our servicemen and women, and only cares about himself. 

We know Eugene Vindman’s brother was driven from the service by toadies in the Trump administration (the same enablers who defend him now). Lt. Col. Eugene Vindman has said quite publicly that after he filed his own whistleblower complaint, he was retaliated against by Trump officials. He, too, decided to take off the uniform he had worn with pride for many years.

 

I also found a story in The Hill, from September 4, summarizing comments from retired Lt. General Mark Hertling, in a talk with Don Lemon on CNN. Hertling told his host that he had spoken with active duty military as well as veterans. These men and women were “furious” when they heard reports of the president’s comments. “It’s tough to speak out right now if you’re an active-duty serving general officer,” Hertling said in an interview. “By not saying anything, they’re saying a lot.” 

(And if you do cross this president, your career is ruined, and you end up like the Vindman brothers.) 

I kept trying to sort out all the stories I could find. Multiple news outlets had confirmed most of the claims Jeffrey Goldberg made in The Atlantic. At least a dozen people inside the Trump orbit had apparently heard Trump disparage the troops. And on multiple occasions. (I even wondered: If The Atlantic says it had a source, and The New York Times said it had a source, and Jenifer Griffin of Fox News said she had a source, could they all be using the same anonymous source, so that where it looked like three witnesses to conversations had surfaced, there was really one?) 

Like a man possessed, I kept digging, deeper and deeper in the same hole, looking for gold nuggets of proof.

 

Let’s just say, I kept finding flakes. I checked Trump’s Twitter feed. If you carry out a word search, you’ll discover he has used the word “loser” to describe critics and enemies dozens of times. Crass, no-class insults are the president’s stock in trade. You know, if any president could ever refer to U.S. war dead as “losers,” and those who served in Vietnam as “suckers,” Trump is the one. 

On Twitter, the president’s habit of going low is always on view. Anthony Scaramucci, who Trump hired briefly to be his press secretary, is suddenly “a loser who begged to come back” after the president canned him. John Kasich, former Republican governor of Ohio, is “another loser.” CNN’s Chris Cuomo, “Fredo,” as Trump likes to call him, is a loser. So are the “lowlifes and losers” protesting in New York City right now. The people who work at CNN, are even worse, “sick losers” as the president calls them, in just one of countless attacks on the free press. Mitt Romney gets the ALL-CAPS treatment from the man with no class: “LOSER!” Chuck Schumer is a “totally overrated loser.” There are “RINO losers” too. Some “losers,” get nicknames: Elizabeth Warren is “Pocahontas,” Michael Bloomberg is “Mini Mike.” John Harwood, a reporter, is a “total loser,” which I assume is the worst kind of all. 

Then again, there are “stone cold losers” working for the Washington Post.

 

In fact, as soon as the Goldberg story broke in The Atlantic, Trump went on offense. To prove he would never call dead Marines from 1918 “losers,” he retweeted a post by Matt Schlapp, a soulless enabler if ever there was one. Schlapp had posted simplistically: “The Losers and Suckers work for the Atlantic. They are colluding with the socialists to stop Trump.” 

(Let’s just say one does not go wisely to Trump’s Twitter feed in search of facts, or even cogent analysis of current events. One goes for the lies, the polemics, and the inadvertent comedy.) 

You could even find Trump tweet-denying that he called John McCain a “loser.” Then you could check around a little, as noted yesterday, and easily find the tape and watch when he did.

 

* 

A press conference proves the president will always go low. 

IT’S TUESDAY by the time I complete this post. And I still can’t say with lead pipe certitude, that Trump said what Jeffrey Goldberg says sources said he said. I am not the only person, however, to notice that Gen. Kelly has remained silent, despite Trump’s cheap shot attacks. 

But I read through the transcript of the president’s Monday “press conference,” looking for new insight. And I would argue they provide all the evidence we need to decide what kind of man Donald Trump is. Is he capable of going to lows even those of us who don’t like him could never imagine? 

Absolutely.

 

This was vintage Trump on display, wine soured to vinegar, with a hint of arsenic. Here, on public display, the president went just as low as any of the anonymous sources in The Atlantic had said. At one point, Trump explained his dislike for Sen. McCain. The man is dead. You’d think he could let it go; but that’s not who Donald J. Trump is. “John McCain liked wars,” he claimed. “I will be a better warrior than anybody, but when we fight a war, we’re going to win them.” 

McCain, imprisoned and tortured for five years, “liked wars?” And Cadet Bone Spurs was a “better warrior than anybody?” 

Even I was a better warrior than Trump – and I was a supply clerk in the Marines, about as unheroic a job as there can possibly be.


Marine supply clerk - in California, during Vietnam War.