Showing posts with label DHS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DHS. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 6, 2022

July 24-25, 2020: Trump Oversteps Constitutional Limits

 7/24-25/20: We have a few positive stories to report. On Friday every player and coach on the New York Yankees and Washington Nationals took a knee before their opening game of the much-delayed season. It was their way of showing support for the “Black Lives Matter” movement. 

Then again: The president has said he will not watch any game where kneeling occurs. Not baseball. Not chess. Not Scrabble.


Yankees players take a knee.


 

____________________ 

The Department of Homeland Security “was not established to be the president’s personal militia. 

Former Secretary of DHS, Tom Ridge

____________________

  

Kneeling is bad! But obstructing justice? That’s cool. Trump also announces that he would consider pardoning anyone implicated in the Mueller investigation. In another one of his near-nightly call-ins to Sean Hannity’s show, he says, “I’ve looked at a lot of different people. They’ve been treated extremely unfairly, and I think I probably would, yes,” Trump says. He would pardon them. 

Fortunately, we can also report there are some Republicans who have spines and understand the reason the U.S. Constitution is replete with checks and balances. Former Secretary of Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, made it clear this week that he believes Trump has leaped over the constitutional line by sending federal paramilitary forces to cities and states where mayors and governors have not requested them. As first head of Homeland Security, Ridge noted that his department was established to protect America from “global terrorism.” In a radio interview he explained, “It was not established to be the president’s personal militia.” 

Ridge would have been happy to work with state and local leaders if asked. Otherwise, “it would be a cold day in hell before I would consent to an uninvited, unilateral intervention” into any American city.

 

Michael Chertoff, another former head of Homeland Security, and another Republican, similarly faulted the president for tone and tactics. Trump wasn’t helping with his “very belligerent, aggressive tone,” Mr. Chertoff cautioned. “You can protect federal property, but that doesn’t mean it’s an unlimited license to roam around the streets [emphasis added] and pick up people based on some suspicion that maybe they’re involved or gonna be involved in something.” 

Neither Ridge nor Chertoff were condoning violence. Nevertheless, there are reasons the U.S. Constitution limits situations in which a president can call out troops and send them into states without governors asking. This new tactic, sending in Immigrations and Custom Enforcement officers and heavily-armed tactical teams from a variety of federal agencies (not technically U.S. military forces) sets a dangerous precedent. Think Hong Kong 2020, or Tahrir Square 2013. 

Or Boston Massacre, 1770.

 

“Whatever the statutory authority is, we still have a Constitution and that requires reasonable suspicion to stop somebody,” Chertoff added. We require, “probable cause to arrest them. And it’s not clear to me that that is being applied in this case.” 

Chertoff told ABC News he wished Team Trump would do more to safeguard the next election and quit focusing on mail-in balloting as a problem. “There is zero evidence that mail-in voting creates widespread problems in an election,” he said. “It’s not of the scale that could possibly impact on a national election. So, there is zero evidence for this.” 

Chertoff later spoke to a reporter from the Washington Post, and said sending in forces to cities where they were not wanted would damage DHS. “It undermines the credibility of the department’s principal mission,” he warned. “While it’s appropriate for DHS to protect federal property, that is not an excuse to range more widely in a city and to conduct police operations, particularly if local authorities have not requested federal assistance. That’s our constitutional system.” 

Chertoff also had concerns because Trump had singled out Democratic cities. “Essentially, he’s suggesting this is a political maneuver. As someone who’s spent four years at the department, the idea that people would be suggesting that it’s going to be a tool of political activity is very unsettling.” 

“It’s very problematic legally as well as morally.”

 

Retired three-star Gen. Russell HonorĂ© has not forgotten the oath he took to defend the U.S. Constitution, either. 

In an interview last week he too blasted Team Trump for sending men in uniform to crush protests in American cities. That uniform, he said, “represents the cloth of our nation” and “it’s not to be used as an instrument of protest suppression.” Real soldiers, he added, “don’t just walk up to people and start beating them…with batons.” 

Watch this, he said. A film clip ran, and a uniformed man beat a U.S. Navy veteran. “What kind of bullshit is this?” Gen. HonorĂ© fumed.

 

* 

IN OTHER GOOD NEWS, the judicial branch continues to rebuke the man in the White House. 

We know Trump has a soft spot for felons, accused (Ghislaine Maxwell) and convicted (Gen. Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort), just not felons who lied for him, but later decided to cooperate with investigators. Flynn, who admitted perjury – in return for dodging a variety of additional charges – got his case thrown out entirely, thanks to Trump. Stone, with seven felonies, never spent a day behind bars. Paul Manafort, with ten felonies, has been released from the slammer due to age and health concerns in a time of coronavirus. Yet, Team Trump, working through the Department of Quasi-Justice decided one felon, Michael Cohen, with eight counts against him, should definitely remain in jail. 

A judge has ruled that the DOJ sent Cohen, the president’s former personal lawyer, back to jail in “retaliation for his plans to publish a book about the president [emphasis added].” The judge noted that Cohen’s First Amendment rights had been violated. 

Cohen hopes to have his book done before the election, but was offered a chance to remain free if he promised not to talk to the media about his plans or work on his story. He decided to fight his case. And lest we forget, Cohen went to jail for committing felonies involving a co-conspirator, labeled “Individual 1,” in his indictment. That unnamed accomplice? His initials are DJT. 

Nor is this the first time Team Trump has tried to ban a book that might be damaging. They tried to block publication of John Bolton’s book, and Mary Trump’s book, too. (See also: Fire and Fury1/3/18.)

 

* 

On Saturday, the first anniversary of President Trump’s call to the President of Ukraine, Lt. Colonel  Alexander Vindman posts a tweet. “One year since The Call. Much has changed for me and so much more has changed for our country,” he says. “I rest well knowing I did my duty.” 

 

* 

COVID-19 cases on July 24: 

74,818.

 

Cases on July 25: 

64,582.

Monday, March 28, 2022

December 1, 2020: Trump Lawyer Jenna Ellis once Told the Truth

 

December 1, 2020: Lame Duck Don has fifty days left to squander in office. Making the most of his time, the White House calendar for today reads: “The President has no public events scheduled.” 

A quick check shows that’s the sixteenth day since the election, where Trump has remained (essentially) in hiding.

 

* 

THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN continues to wage a losing battle on multiple legal fronts in an effort to overturn election results.

 

____________________ 

“I’m fearful for the republic right now.” 

Jordan Harbinger, conservative podcast host, talking about Trump

____________________

  

Given the current situation, Trump campaign lawyer Joe diGenova tells a radio host that sprinkling the tree of liberty with a little gore might be a excellent idea. That situation being: Trump losing the vote in six critical swing states. 

Since Christopher Krebs, the former head of the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity unit, keeps insisting the election was one of the most secure in U.S. history, diGenova has a novel idea. “That guy is a Class-A moron,” he tells his host. “He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot.” 

Krebs was appointed by Donald Trump – and then fired by Donald Trump when he insisted, based on all the evidence his cybersecurity unit could find, that the November election was not, in fact, rigged.



Drawn and quartered.


 

We already knew that Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who the president called an “enemy of the people” for upholding Georgia vote returns, had faced death threats, as had his wife. 

So diGenova’s suggestion probably didn’t help.

 

* 

SINCE THIS BLOGGER IS RETIRED, and also recovering from COVID-19, which precludes getting most yard work done, he has plenty of time to study the story of the Trump campaign and its efforts to overturn the vote. One of Trump’s key lawyers in this fight is Jenna Ellis. 

A tip from a friend told me it would be fun to turn back time to 2016, when Trump was just a lame-assed candidate running for president, and find out what Ellis thought about her current boss back then. 

Once again, CNN did what any news network could have done and this blogger did to get the story straight. They went to Ellis’s old social media posts and they (and I) replayed old radio appearances from February 2016. Even People magazine did due diligence in this regard.  

 

In one old Twitter post, from March 2016, it was discovered that Ms. Ellis had referred to Candidate Trump as an unethical, corrupt, lying, criminal, dirtbag.” 

In another post she wrote, “I could spend a full-time job just responding to the ridiculously illogical, inconsistent, and blatantly stupid arguments supporting Trump. But here’s the thing: his supporters DON’T CARE about facts or logic. They aren’t seeking truth.” 

In a radio interview from that period, Ellis talked about the candidate and warned, “his crazy is coming out.” Her host, Jordan Harbinger, agreed. “I’m fearful for the republic right now,” he said. Ellis wondered, if Trump won the Republican nomination, how “we’re going to preserve the republic.”

 

It’s a conservative talk show. So, Harbinger mentions two dictator wannabes. Obama, of course, is one. 

Trump is the other. 

“This guy can’t take criticism,” the host says of Candidate Donald. Ellis agrees. She calls Trump a “typical bully” (go to around the 19:30 mark on the tape to hear). The host plays a recording of the candidate at one of his rallies, threatening to make it easier to sue newspapers for libel if elected. “That is about one of the scariest things, and you know what’s even scarier than what he said?” Harbinger asks. 

“Is there something that’s scarier than that?” Ellis interjects. 

Yes, he says, “The crowd’s reaction.” 

Ellis agrees. 

“That’s the sound of liberty dying,” Harbinger posits. “It is,” Ellis agrees. 

“That’s the sound of a dictator taking over,” he says.

 

Ellis warns that people don’t understand that “this is going against the First Amendment right to free speech, right to freedom of the press, that the government doesn’t give us that right, it’s an unalienable right.” 

Harbinger asks Ellis, in a joking reference to Trump, “Why do you hate the Supreme Leader?” 

“I still value my First Amendment rights,” she replies. 

 

“He wants to go against the Constitution.” 

Just before the 28:00 minute mark, Harbinger wonders if Trump should he be elected can “work within the confines of the Constitution?” 

“I don’t think he wants to,” Ellis replies. She doesn’t think Trump is stupid. She admits he has run a strong campaign. But “he wants to go against the Constitution.” 

Ellis  explains that as a lawyer, her value is that she can explain to clients, predict, what will happen if they go to court. She says if she went before a judge “that was as insane as Trump” it would be impossible to know what the outcome would be. Around the 37:00 minute mark, she warns that Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, the only GOP candidates left who still had a viable chance to stop Trump, really needed to focus on “how unpredictable and insane this guy is.” 

Four years later, here we are. 

Ellis is fighting to win the insane guy and the guy she called a threat to the First Amendment and the Constitution a second term. 

Truly insane. 


* 

“Hung for treason.” 

DOWN IN GEORGIA, Gabriel Sterling, a top election official under Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, pleads for Trump to chill his fiery rhetoric. “Someone’s going to get hurt, someone’s going to get shot, someone’s going to get killed,” Sterling warns. “It’s not right.”

 

He cites a Twitter thread that accused a young technician working on the Georgia recount of altering votes. This led to his identity being released online and calls for him to be “hung for treason.”

 

Sterling explains that the young tech was “transferring a report on batches of votes from an EMS to a county computer so he could read it.” 

“His family is getting harassed now. There’s a noose out there with his name on it. And it's not right,” he continues. “I’ve got police protection outside my house. Fine. You know, I took a higher-profile job. I get it, the secretary [Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger] ran for office; his wife knew that, too. This kid took a job. He just took a job, and it’s just wrong.”

 

“It has to stop,” Sterling adds. “Mr. President, you have not condemned these actions or this language. Senators [Loeffler and Perdue], you have not condemned this language or these actions. This has to stop. We need you to step up. And if you take a position of leadership, show some.”

 

Tuesday afternoon, NPR reports,

 

police were called to a Gwinnett County location where a man who was live-streaming video followed workers he believed were secretly transporting voting machines in violation of a court order. In the video, an officer explained that boxes were full of office phones and told the man he was trespassing.

 

(If a young technician got killed, Trump wouldn’t care a bit.)

 

Meanwhile, unproven allegations that Dominion Voting Systems machines were rigged against the Orange God, lead to crazy right-wing types putting a $1,000,000 bounty on the head of Dr. Eric Coomer, security director for the company. 

(Trump, the “law and order” president, wouldn’t care if he got murdered, too.) 

 

POSTSCRIPT: We know Ellis has been having a hard time telling the difference between rivers and trees (see: 11/29/20), and deducing the difference between Teddy Roosevelt and any other president, including Donald J. Trump. 

Recently she posted this: 

 

It wasn’t long before numerous experts informed her that no one had ever heard this Teddy quote before. 

Ms. Ellis defended her use of the fake quote, insisting, “I posted it because the ifea [sic] is true, whether or not he said it!” 

So, allow me to post my own fake quote. It’s from Abraham Lincoln. “Four score and some other bunch of years ago, we brought forth a megalomaniac as our president. And his name was Trump. With malice for everyone except his base, he proved to be a really terrible president.” 

The “ifea” is true, whether or not Mr. Lincoln ever said it. 

 

FAKE FUN FACT: Just when you can’t imagine that President Trump can sink any lower, he manages again. This time, he claims that an emergency hospital ward, set up in Reno, Nevada, to treat an overflow of COVID-19 patients, is “fake” and only meant to make him look bad. 

“Fake election results in Nevada, also!” Trump tweets, along with a ward filled with beds, but no patients. 

(The next day, the doctor in the picture Trump shared, to “prove” the overflow ward was fake explains that it would have been a violation of HIPAA and patient privacy laws to show patients. Which you might think some White House aide, or even Dr. Scott Atlas (see: 12/2/200, could have told him. 

Dr. Jacob Keeperman, the doctor in question, doesn’t exactly say it, but you know he’s thinking it: Trump is a soulless douche bag. CDC reports that 2,465 Americans die from the coronavirus on December 1.

Monday, February 28, 2022

January 31: No One Should Want Trump to Run Again

1/31/22: In a recent poll even 44% of Republicans said they did not want Trump to run again in 2024. 

 

____________________ 

Mitt Romney got a higher percentage of the popular vote.

____________________

 

According to one GOP pollster, President Biden currently has a favorable rating of 46%, and an unfavorable rating of 52%. 

Not good. But when asked if people had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Trump, the numbers were worse: 40% to 57%. 

Right now, two thirds of Americans hope neither Trump nor Biden will run in 2024 and that’s with Biden running into serious problems. If they did run, however, by 47% to 43% they’d pick Biden. 

Mr. Blogger likes to point out that Mitt Romney got a higher percentage of the popular vote in 2012 than Trump did in two cracks at winning the presidency. Partly because, if you disagreed with Romney on positions (remember when he was touting investing in Chinese businesses), he was at least a decent human being.



If you have any brains at all, you should be able to figure out why you don't want the
military involved in settling elections.


 

* 

WE SHOULD ALL HOPE that Trump never runs again because he might win and destroy democracy once and for all. 

The New York Times has evidence that in December 2020, President Trump was well aware of actively supporting a plan to seize the voting machines in several states that he lost. His closest, craziest advisors, including Gen. Michael T. Flynn, were pushing hard for the seizure. In fact, Mr. Trump eventually asked his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to call the Department of Homeland Security and tell them to seize the machines, arguing that there was massive evidence of tampering to justify the move. 

(No such evidence has been found since.)

 

Trump had already asked Attorney General Bill Barr if he would like to seize the machines, but Barr told him plainly there was no evidence to justify such a move. 

The Defense Department was offered the chance next, with retired Col. Phil Waldron, circulating an email laying out the case for why the machines should be impounded and examined. 

In addition, we know Trump pressured local officials in Michigan and Pennsylvania to seize the machines in their states. Like Mr. Barr, local officials also passed on the chance to be part of a Latin American-style coup.

 

At a White House meeting, on December 18, the idea of ordering U.S. troops to seize voting machines was broached. Gen. Flynn was all for it. So was lawyer Sidney Powell. So was Waldron. Even Rudy expressed opposition this time – proving how really crazy the military-will-do-it option actually was. Waldron did a new draft of his plan, dropping the military, giving the job to the Department of Homeland Security, instead. A call went out to Ken Cuccinelli, head of DHS, but he, too, made clear he had no authority to grab the voting machines. 

How terrible was this plot? Even Howard Kurtz of Fox News had enough command of his senses to smell a surfeit of skunks once they sprayed the Oval Office. Commenting on the Times report, he said,

 

The gist is that Trump explored having the Pentagon, Justice Department or Homeland Security seize voting machines in disputed states based on a complete lack of evidence that they had been tampered with. The voting machine theories, promoted by fringe characters around Trump, were the wackiest of all, said to include machinations involving Venezuela and Hugo Chavez.

 

Think, for a moment, of the reaction if the leader of another country had ordered the confiscation of voting machines in a disputed election, and how that would play here. 

 

“You might say the system worked,” Kurtz finally added, “but the fact the president was openly debating these unconstitutional schemes in the White House is rather chilling. You can support Donald Trump, you can believe there was election fraud, but there’s no getting around the craziness of this particular plot.” 

The problem with Kurtz’s analysis, however, is plain. Had Trump been able to find a willing participant to order the seizure, it would have occurred. Then it wouldn’t have been an “unconstitutional scheme.” It wouldn’t have been “rather chilling.” 

It would have been a coup, carried out by Trump, with the help of whatever portion of the U.S. military would have been willing to go along.

 

* 

THE SECOND-RANKING Republican in the U.S. Senate, John Thune, was frank when asked to comment on the Times report. He praised those, like Mr. Cuccinelli, who stood up to Trump and his team. “I’m just glad that there were people in the right places and that the system worked,” he told reporters. “People who had positions of responsibility held their ground even when being asked to do things that they knew they shouldn’t do. Things may have bent a little bit, but they didn’t break.” 

What bent a little? 

The U.S. Constitution. 

And who tried not only to bend it but to break it? 

Trump and his pals. 

No one who truly loves this country should ignore these facts.