Showing posts with label Trump Tower Moscow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump Tower Moscow. Show all posts

Thursday, June 9, 2022

April 11, 2018: Just Because the President is Frustrated, that Doesn't Mean the U.S. Constitution is Negated

 

4/11/18: I think we can assume the president spent another restless night in the West Wing. It turns out Trump is fuming about “an attack on our country in a true sense,” and by that we mean...North Korea? 

Russia? 

No…we mean the F.B.I. raid on Michael Cohen. 




____________________ 

“It would be suicide for the president to want to talk about firing Mueller.” 

Sen. Charles Grassley, (R-Iowa)

____________________ 

 

What do we know about the gentleman in question? We know Cohen has been referred to as Trump’s “pit bull.” We know Cohen likes to compare himself to Tom Hagan, lawyer for the Corleone family in The Godfather. We know he has threatened Trump’s enemies in the past. He has worked the boss out of legal jams related to shady business deals and paid out of his own pocket (or so he claims) to silence porn stars who might have dirt on Trump. We know in December 2015, with Trump already running for president, that Mr. Cohen was excited to see a news story quoting Vladimir Putin, saying Trump was “talented” and “very colorful.” 

Cohen viewed that story through the same lens anyone who works for Donald J. Trump would. Namely: green-colored glasses. This was a chance to cash in! Cohen emailed a friend who had been talking extensively with the Russians in an effort to close the deal and build a Trump Tower in Moscow. “Now is the time,” Cohen told Felix Sater, that friend. “Call me.” 

In those days, Sater  (a convicted felon) was working on drumming up Kremlin support. More emails and phone calls flew back and forth. Negotiations progressed to a point where Candidate Trump signed a letter of intent to build in the Russian capital. Then the business deal stalled. 

Cohen reached out to the Russians again in January 2016. 

Now remember: His boss is running to become the President of the United States. And what is the focus? 

Money.

 

That January, he contacted Vladimir Putin’s private secretary to ask about getting a tower built. According to Cohen nothing lucrative could be arranged. “I decided to abandon the proposal less than two weeks later for business reasons,” he said, “and do not recall any response to my email.” 

Again, don’t miss the point. Trump and his personal lawyer and his felonious friend would have happily worked with Vladimir Putin, the kleptomaniacal leader of a nation ranked first or second on a list of our implacable foes. The moral questions didn’t matter. The money just wasn’t right. 


$$$$$

 

In addition, we now learn that the president had to be talked down from the White House roof Tuesday – not to mention last December, as well. The raids aimed at his lawyer left Trump in a rage. 

Trump spent the day glaring at the television and steaming over how to respond to news of this raid. He might, for example, allow the investigations to continue, potentially clearing his name. If the whole investigation is really a “witch hunt” he has nothing to hide because witches can’t fly. Or he could just fire everyone he can, and maybe a few people he legally can’t. 

In the wake of the Cohen raids, Trump was wallowing in self-pity. He threatened to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. He would put some hack, maybe Fox News howler, Judge Jeanine Pirro, in his place. Then the hack would fire Mueller. Trump would fire Attorney General Jeff Sessions and F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray. 

According to one White House source, behind the scenes the president was acting like a madman. Asked by reporters on Monday if he intended to fire Mueller, Trump responded, “We’ll see what happens. …Many people have said ‘you should fire him,’” he claimed. Then he went with the clincher: “Again, they [the investigators] found nothing and in finding nothing, that’s a big statement.”  

Of course, if we’re being honest no one knows yet what the F.B.I. has found, including the F.B.I. 

What we do know is that to get a search warrant, agents would have to prove to a judge that they had “probable cause” to suspect crimes were being or would soon be committed if they did not quickly act. (See: 4/12/18; 4/25/18; 5/4-5/18; 5/7/18 and  7/2/18 for comparison):

 

* 

TUESDAY, PINOCCHIO SANDERS tells reporters at the daily press briefing that she hates her job lying for Trump and would rather work for the D.C. Sewer Department than keep up the charade. 

No, seriously, she says the president believes he has the power to fire Mueller. If Trump told Sanders he had the power to levitate the Pentagon, she would go out like a parrot and squawk agreement. 

For once there were rumblings among Republicans, however gingerly they decided to rumble. Sen. Charles Grassley, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, was at the forceful end of the spectrum. “It would be suicide for the president to want to talk about firing Mueller,” he warned. 

Sen. Milksop Mitch McConnell was waiting to be enrolled in the Witness Protection Program and could not be reached for comment. 

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan gave it all up and announced he would retire at the end of his term. 

Sen. Joni Ernst, of Iowa, a war veteran, and someone from whom you might expect a little courage, punted when it came to upholding the U.S. Constitution. “No,” she said, she didn’t see why the Senate should pass legislation to protect Mueller from being fired, “because I don’t think the president’s going to do it – and do you think the president would sign that legislation?” 

Ha, ha, good one Sen. Ernst. “Checks and balances.” So passé.

 

Other Republicans at least had something to offer. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana gave the president the benefit of the doubt and said he thought Trump was “too smart” to get rid of Mueller. “I think it would provoke some sort of reaction by Congress. I think he knows that,” Kennedy said. Besides, “the president can’t just fire Mr. Mueller, Kennedy added. “He’s got to direct Mr. Rosenstein to fire him, and I don’t think Mr. Rosenstein would do it.” 

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn said firing Mueller wouldn’t do the president any good. “The facts will come out one way or the other.” Mueller and his team would be expected to compile a report, even if he were fired, and that report would be made public, whether to exonerate Trump or not. 

Finally, when I called my own Republican senator, Rob Portman, and left a message, I got a lengthy email response. In a key paragraph, Portman provided the kind of response that gave a shred of hope: 

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller is well qualified to oversee this probe and I continue to support his efforts to fully investigate this issue. Determining the extent of Russian efforts to influence our democratic process is a matter of national security and is far more important than partisan politics. Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation should be allowed to run its full course, and he should remain in charge.

 

In the House of Representatives, however, abject cowardice has been more the rule of the day. 

 

“I think the president is very frustrated.” 

These lawmakers have elections to win every other year, and what matters most to them is 2018, not 1215, when, in the Magna Carta, the English enshrined the rule of law. A bill to protect Mueller, sponsored by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN.) has the backing of almost every Democratic member of the House. One Republican, Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina, is supporting the bill. 

In theory, this would be the chance for all members of the House to prove we still have three coequal branches of government and that two are working to protect fundamental principles. 

Sadly, it’s not happening with these clowns and cowards. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL.), one of the head clowns on the House Judiciary Committee, has been calling, instead, for a panel to bring in Attorney General Sessions, Deputy A.G. Rosenstein, and Special Counsel Mueller to explain the thinking behind their investigative efforts. “I think the president is very frustrated,” Gaetz explains. 

There it is in a terrifying nutshell. If the president is frustrated, then the guiding principles laid down by the Founding Fathers in 1787, including the belief that no man is above the law, may be swept aside.




Monday, May 30, 2022

September 20, 2018: Michael Cohen May Spill Trump's Beans

 

9/20/18: ABC News reports that Michael Cohen is talking to Mueller’s team. The president’s former personal lawyer has had “multiple interview sessions lasting for hours.” Those interviews have been held in both Washington D.C. and New York City, where Cohen has spoken to prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York. 


Topics of interest include: 

Trump’s dealings with Russia – including financial and business ties (possible crime: money laundering) 

Collusion with Russians during the 2016 campaign (legally speaking: possible conspiracy) 

Any pardon offers Cohen might have received (i.e. obstruction of justice; witness-tampering) 

The inner workings of the Trump family charity and Trump Organization, where Cohen served as executive vice president for ten years (tax fraud) 

 

We can also assume investigators will ask Cohen: 

Did you travel to Prague in early 2016 and meet with Russians about covering up payments to hackers who were going after Clinton’s emails? (conspiracy) 

Who knew about the secret June 9, 2016, meeting with Russians? Was there another meeting, three days earlier, to strategize? (perjury; obstruction of justice) 

Did Trump pay hush money settlements to other than the two women already known, and the doorman, during the campaign? (campaign finance violations) 

What light can you shed on Donald J. Trump’s taxes? (tax evasion) 

As a businessman, is Trump a crook? (everything)



Monday, May 23, 2022

November 29-30, 2018: The Trump Tower Moscow Deal - and a Bribe for Vladimir Putin

 

11/29-30/18: President Trump departs for the G-20 Summit in Argentina on Thursday. You wonder if he’ll come back. 

Mueller apparently has documents!!! 

____________________ 

“Because I think that would be a conflict.” 

President-elect Trump

____________________ 

 

Trump’s former fixer, Michael Cohen, who worked for Trump for many years, opens a Pandora’s Box brimming with legal and ethical questions when he admits lying in court about the Trump Tower Moscow deal. 

Cohen lied, he says, to ensure his story meshed with the tall tale Candidate Trump was telling at the time. 

And it won’t be just a case of, “Cohen said, the president said.” Mueller has documents to back up what Trump’s fixer said.



When you kick over a rock in Trumpistan, a felon is exposed to the light.

Felix Sater, left.


 

First the lies: Cohen previously testified before Congress that efforts to win a contract for a Trump Tower in Moscow ended in January 2016. Thursday, he admitted that contacts with Russian officials continued into June. 

In other words, Cohen was trying to cover up the fact that Team Trump was working on a lucrative deal with Russians while Candidate Trump was deep into a campaign to become the next President of the United States. 

How lucrative? Some experts say it could have been Trump’s biggest deal ever. The deal was big enough to convince Cohen and other Trump associates to offer to sweeten it by gifting Putin a penthouse worth $50 million. 

“NO COLLUSION,” Trump loves to tweet. Well, then, how about a $50 million bribe, offered to the leader of a hostile foreign power? 

At the same time we know Candidate Trump was telling anyone who would listen, that he did not have financial ties with Russia. “How many times do I have to say that?” he asked at a news conference in July 2016. “I have nothing to do with Russia. I have nothing to do with Russia.” 

With Trump, of course, the lying continued. In a presidential debate on October 16 he responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that Russia was interfering in the election, in hopes he’d win: 

I notice, anytime anything wrong happens, they like to say the Russians are – she doesn’t know if it’s the Russians doing the hacking. Maybe there is no hacking. But they always blame Russia. And the reason they blame Russia because they think they’re trying to tarnish me with Russia. I know nothing about Russia. I know – I know about Russia, but I know nothing about the inner workings of Russia. I don’t deal there. I have no businesses there. I have no loans from Russia.

 

That statement, read today, obviously includes a series of brazen lies. By then his advisers already knew the Russians were doing at least some of the hacking; his campaign had already been offered dirt on Clinton by Russians; and he had been dealing in Russia, just not with success. 

As president-elect, Trump continued lying. At a press conference on January 11, 2017, he told reporters, “So I have no deals, I have no loans and I have no dealings. We could make deals in Russia very easily if we wanted to. I just don’t want to because I think that would be a conflict. So I have no loans, no dealings, and no current pending deals.” 

That statement contains an additional falsehood and a fundamental truth. First, he’s lying when he says he doesn’t want to make a deal. 

Second, here’s the fundamental truth. Trump is aware that efforts to land a deal in Moscow while running for office would have been a conflict.

 

* 

TODAY, WE KNOW that a confluence of events occurred in June 2016. The “Fake News” people and investigators have slowly laid this out. George Papadopoulos, a campaign aide, met in March and April with a man he believed could provide dirt on Clinton. Papadopoulos lied about it later and the man he met disappeared. Roger Stone met with a Russian in May and later told Congress he didn’t. The Russians knew Trump and his team were open to cutting a deal. In June, the two sides – Trump campaign and Russians – came to an understanding of some sort. 

Mueller is still working to find out what that understanding was. But he’s gathering documents. 

That month, the Trump campaign/Russian support starts to mesh: 

June 3: Rob Goldstone, the agent for the Russian singer Emin Agalarov, who Don Sr. and Don Jr. know from working with Emin and his father on the 2013 Miss Universe pageant, sends Don Jr. an email. 

Goldstone says an official high in the ranks of the Putin government is “offering material that will incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.” 

Don Jr. doesn’t hesitate. He doesn’t notify the F.B.I. He responds within hours: “If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer.”

 

June 6: Trump knocks out his last remaining opponent in the Republican primaries: “Lyin’ Ted” Cruz. 

Cohen claims that top campaign officials and Don Jr. held a strategy meeting that day to discuss plans to meet with the Russians and see what dirt they could provide; and Don Sr. was aware of and green-lighted the meeting. 

(BLOGGER’S NOTE 5/23/22: This particular meeting has never been proven.)

 

June 7: Candidate Trump announces to the nation: 

I am going to give a major speech on probably Monday of next week [June 13] and we’re going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons.

 

I think you’re going to find it very informative and very, very interesting. I wonder if the press will want to attend. Who knows? Hillary Clinton turned the State Department into her private hedge fund. The Russians, the Saudis, the Chinese all gave money to Bill and Hillary and got favorable treatment in return. It’s a sad day in America when foreign governments with deep pockets have more influence in our own country than our great citizens. 

(See: Trump Tower deal in Moscow!)

 

June 9: Don Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort meet secretly at Trump Tower in New York City with Russians they believe are bearing gifts, frankincense, myrrh, and dirt on Hillary. 

June 10: Leaders of the campaign suffer an attack of mass amnesia. No one in the meeting the day before remembers having had the meeting, discussing it beforehand, talking about it after, having dreams and/or nightmares about it, what was discussed by participants, or who participants were.

 

June 13: Monday comes and goes. The major speech promised by Candidate Trump fails to materialize. 

June 14: It’s Flag Day. Members of the Trump campaign seem confused about which flag they serve. 

According to the latest Mueller indictment, revealed this week, it is then, on June 14, that Trump and his people finally pull the plug on the Moscow deal. Suddenly, they realize Trump could be elected. 

The Russians know a victory is a longshot but they’re more than happy to help, because Putin hates Hillary. And they know Trump and his lackeys are willing to accept any aid they can provide.

 

* 

AS TRUMP FLIES OFF to Argentina he has to understand something ominous is brewing. Mueller has documents – he’s gathering more – and the president knows it. On Thursday, F.B.I. agents raid the Chicago offices of Ed Burke, a man the Chicago Sun-Times describes as having “dodged dozens of federal investigations over five decades in Chicago politics.”  Agents “kicked everyone out and papered over the windows.” Later they debarked with boxes of documents and computers in hand. 

Burke has previously done property-tax-appeal work for Trump. 

Could this raid be related to the president’s burgeoning legal problems? We don’t know. We do know Cohen did the dirty work for Trump for years and knows where the rotting corpses are interred. 

And we’re still not done listing suspicious characters and corporations. In Germany, a wave of police, prosecutors and tax authorities descends on the Frankfurt headquarters of Deutsche Bank. Electronic records and documents are seized at five locations as part of an investigation “into whether the lender helped criminals launder money through offshore tax havens.” 

 

Greed drives everyone in this story. 

Again, we can’t know if this has anything to do with Trump; but if you don’t think the people he hangs with and does business with aren’t willing to commit every imaginable crime to reap fortunes, you’re watching more Fox News than is good for your mental health. Seek counseling at once. Deutsche Bank was fined $425 million last year “for helping clients of its Moscow office illegally move $10 billion out of Russia.” 

The bank has been fined before for failing to monitor transactions that involved cash going to terrorists. 

Does Trump do business with Deutsche – known for working with money-launderers? Of course! This past May it was reported that Mueller subpoenaed bank records related to our fearless leader’s finances. Market Watch reported that the president had liabilities (basically: outstanding loans) totaling between $356 million and $480 million, including $175 million owed to Deutsche. 

Here’s what we do know. None of these developments prove that the President of the United States is a gigundous crook. But we know greed drives him and everyone in this story. 

If all else had failed, and Clinton had defeated him, Trump could still hope to land a huge financial windfall in Moscow by building his hotel. 

Or: with Russian help, he could win the highest office in the land.

 

* 

WE DEFINITELY KNOW that Special Counsel Mueller takes Cohen’s plea deal seriously. Mueller signed it himself, a first during the investigation. 

 

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE PLEA AGREEMENT 

If you want to understand which witches investigators might be hunting, you need go no further than the first sentence of the charging document recently revealed in Cohen’s latest plea agreement. 

The case laid out in United States v. Michael Cohen begins: 

From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017, MICHAEL COHEN, the defendant, was an attorney and employee of a Manhattan-based real estate company (the “Company”). COHEN held the title of “Executive Vice President” and “Special Counsel” to the owner of the Company (“Individual 1”).

 

For months now, “Individual 1” has been firing shots at Mueller and his team, if nothing else, in hundreds of tweets. 

Here you have the first fire returned by Mueller, directed at “Individual 1,” Donald J. Trump. 

The sad fig leaf of denial Trump has been trying to position to shield his orange privates is stripped away. 

Last April, when evidence – again including documents – of Cohen’s role in payoffs to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal began to blow up, Trump tried to downgrade his relationship with Cohen. In an interview with Fox News, he insisted, “This doesn’t have to do with me. Michael is a businessman. He’s got a business. He also practices law. And they’re looking at something having to do with his business. I have nothing to do with his business.” 

Asked how much legal work Cohen did for him, Trump claimed, “As a percentage of my overall legal work, a tiny, tiny little fraction.” 

In August, when Cohen plead guilty to an array of crimes and started cooperating with investigators, Trump tried to downgrade their ties even further. Suddenly, all the president’s sycophants began clamoring, “Cohen is a liar!” Trump said nobody should hire Cohen for legal work, he was a terrible lawyer, and only worked for him for a very short decade. If you listened to Trump, he would hardly have recognized Cohen if he walked into the Oval Office and said, “Hey, Boss, do you want me to pay off the porn star or not?” 

Mueller starts off the latest charging document by blasting that fantasy defense to bits.

Cohen was a Trump guy.

 

The legal meat of the matter is easy to explain. In January 2017, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (“SSCI”) and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (“HPSCI”) in the U.S. House of Representatives began to investigate possible links between Russia and the Trump campaign. The Senate panel managed to develop a level of bipartisan cooperation. The House panel, led by Rep. Devin Nunes, couldn’t have found a Russian if Nunes and the other Republicans on the committee jetted to Moscow and roamed the streets for a month. 

 

“Individual 1.” 

Mueller now makes it plain. Cohen lied to both committees. Cohen had testified that the project to build a Trump Tower in Moscow was ended in January 2016. Cohen, himself, testified, “I determined that the proposal was not feasible for a variety of business reasons and should not be pursued further.” 

Cohen had provided a legal shield for his boss. “To the best of my knowledge,” he said at the time, “[Individual 1] was never in contact with anyone about this proposal other than me on three occasions…I did not ask or brief [Individual 1], or any of his family, before I made the decision to terminate further work on the proposal.” 

Cohen further claimed that he never agreed to travel to Russia in connection with the Moscow project. He “never considered” asking “Individual 1” if he should go. Instead, he claimed he “primarily communicated” with a Moscow-based company “through a U.S. citizen third-party intermediary, [Individual 2].” 

(“Individual 2” would be Felix Sater.) 

Sater asked Cohen to travel to Moscow to push the deal forward. Cohen claimed he “never agreed to make a trip to Russia.” He never asked Individual 1 “to travel to Russia in connection with this proposal.” Yes, he testified, he did send Russian officials several emails about the project; but there was little interest. So, in January 2016, “I decided to abandon the proposal… [and from that time forward] do not recall any response to my email, nor any other contacts by me with [Russian Official 1] or other Russian government officials about the proposal.”

 

By the time of the Iowa caucuses, in February, the story was, Trump had terminated all contacts with Russians about building business ties in that country. Cohen issued a public statement to that effect in September 2016. On October 25, 2016, he so testified before Rep. Nunes’ GOP-controlled committee. 

Mueller’s team now has documents and can lay out all kinds of lies. If you’re the president or one of his many shady friends, you immediately start to perspire. It’s not just Cohen agreeing to cooperate that represents a threat. Investigators have documentation. Mueller makes the case: 

In truth and in fact, and as COHEN well knew, COHEN’s representations about the Moscow Project he made to SSCI and HPSCI were false and misleading. COHEN made the false statements to

 

1.     minimize links between the Moscow Project and Individual 1 [emphasis added] and

 

(2) give the false impression that the Moscow Project ended before “the Iowa caucus and . . . the very first primary,” in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigations. COHEN attempted to conceal or minimize through his false statements the following facts:

a. The Moscow Project was discussed multiple times within the Company and did not end in January 2016.

 

“Instead, as late as approximately June 2016,” investigators know, Cohen and Sater were still discussing efforts to obtain Russian government assistance with the project, and Cohen “briefed family members of Individual 1” about the proposal. Cohen made plans to travel to Moscow to pursue the deal – and he and Individual 1 – by then the presumptive nominee for president – discussed plans for Individual 1 to travel to Russia. 

It only gets “better” as you continue to dig through the evidence. Cohen asks “a senior campaign official about potential business travel to Russia.” The official is not named; but like every other member of Team Trump, that official apparently forgets ever having had the discussion. 

 

Russians willing to cooperate with the campaign. 

In fact, as late as May 2016, the project seems more on than off. Sater writes to Cohen on May 4: 

“I had a chat with Moscow. ASSUMING the trip does happen the question is before or after the convention . . . Obviously the pre-meeting trip (you only) can happen anytime you want but the 2 big guys where [sic] the question. I said I would confirm and revert.” COHEN responded, “My trip before Cleveland. [Individual 1] once he becomes the nominee after the convention.”

 

The next day, Sater writes Cohen again, assuring him that, 

[Russian Official 1] would like to invite you as his guest to the St. Petersburg Forum which is Russia’s Davos it’s June 16-19. He wants to meet there with you and possibly introduce you to either [the President of Russia] or [the Prime Minister of Russia], as they are not sure if 1 or both will be there. . . . He said anything you want to discuss including dates and subjects are on the table to discuss.

 

Note that last line – the willingness of the Russians to cooperate with the campaign on any subject they might introduce. 

On May 6, Sater asks Trump’s lawyer to confirm those dates, if they would work for him to travel. Cohen replies, “Works for me.” 

On June 9, we know, Don Jr., Jared Kushner and now-convicted-felon Paul Manafort agree to meet with Russians in Trump Tower, offering anti-Clinton gifts. Mueller’s investigators have proof that 

From on or about June 9 to June 14, 2016, Individual 2 sent numerous messages to COHEN about the travel, including forms for COHEN to complete. However, on or about June 14, 2016, COHEN met Individual 2 in the lobby of the Company’s headquarters to inform Individual 2 he would not be traveling at that time.

 

Does that mean the Moscow project is on hold, or even dead, at last? Or does it mean the people at the top of the Trump campaign know an even better deal has been placed on the table? 

That is: do they realize the Russians are willing to offer direct assistance to help defeat Hillary Clinton? This would be a switch from the mad pursuit of cash to what would, in wartime, amount to treason. If Trump and Cohen and other top aides know Russia is willing to help them – and they’re now willing to jump into bed with a hostile power – you can understand why they’ve been fighting so hard for more than two years to wipe out their tracks. 

 

POSTSCRIPT: By the time Trump hired Sater, the latter had been convicted of multiple felonies, including participation in a $40 million securities fraud scheme. He stayed out of jail in that matter only by turning informant for the F.B.I. 

Naturally, any thoughtful individual would be inclined to ask: “What kind of businessman would hire this kind of guy?”

Friday, May 20, 2022

December 27, 2018: The Steele Dossier Was often Correct

 

12/27/18: Nineteen months ago, Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to lead an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. 

____________________ 

The Steele Dossier was often correct.

____________________ 

 

Today a possible bombshell exploded. 

Just hours ago, McClatchy reported that cell phone records in the hands of Mueller’s team show signals from a phone number registered to Michael Cohen were bounced off a tower near Prague in August 2016. 


Picturesque Prague, Czech Republic.


To understand the explosive nature of this development – if proven true – you have to go back to the famous Steele dossier, which first came to light in January 2017. The handiwork of Christopher Steele, a former British spy, the most salacious revelations involved Donald Trump – in a Moscow hotel in 2013 – with prostitutes peeing – a nightmare version of Clue. 

That story, of course, has never been proven and the president has labeled the dossier “a pile of garbage” ever since.

 

Nevertheless, several allegations have proven true. Keith Schiller, Trump’s bodyguard has admitted that while he and Trump were staying in Moscow in 2013, the Russians did offer to send five prostitutes up to Trump’s room. We know that General Flynn did visit Moscow and did take pay from the Russians. Steele reported that first. Steele claimed the Russians were involved in a sophisticated internet campaign to harm Hillary Clinton and boost Trump. Steele was also right when he reported that Carter Page, a Trump adviser, met with Russian officials in Moscow in the summer of 2016. 

Recently, we learned that the dossier was spot on again. “The Kremlin’s cultivation operation on TRUMP also comprised offering him various lucrative real estate development business deals in Russia,” Steele reported. Michael Cohen, who also figures in the dossier, has admitted negotiations related to building a Trump Tower in Moscow continued until at least June 2016. Rudy Giuliani let slip recently that negotiations for a deal may in fact have continued up till Election Day, when for obvious reasons the deal had to be killed. (See: 12/17/18.) 

Now, today’s revelation threatens to drive one of the last nails required to seal the Trump coffin. Steele’s sources told him two years ago that Cohen had traveled to Prague in the summer of 2016. Cohen was there “to clean up the mess” created by media reports about Paul Manafort’s “corrupt relationship” with Russian oligarchs, also since proven correct, and Page’s suspicious Moscow trip. According to Steele, “Kremlin officials” were going to help Cohen with a cover up if they could. 

Here’s how he put it in the dossier: 

The agenda [for the meeting/s] comprised questions on how deniable cash payments were to be made to hackers who had worked in Europe under Kremlin direction against the CLINTON campaign and various contingencies for covering up these operations and Moscow’s secret liaison with the TRUMP team more generally.

 

Cohen’s meeting with Russians, if proven to have occurred, would be the very essence of collusion, or what would legally be “conspiracy.” 

We know Cohen has always waved his passport at reporters when asked about any trip, showing it had never been stamped for a visit to the Czech Republic. For a long time, the trail appeared to fizzle. Last April, however, McClatchy reported that sources were saying Mueller could prove Cohen traveled to Germany, then hopped a train to Prague. Since he never left the European Union, his passport would not have been stamped and he could cross into the Czech Republic unnoticed. 

Cohen has denied this latest report. Since he has been cooperating with Mueller’s team, a denial, at first glance, seems to put the rumor to rest. “Why would he lie now?” the logic goes. The question is what is Cohen saying behind closed doors? If he admits, or has already admitted, that as representative of the Trump campaign he and the Russians were working on a cover up, this would be akin to the Watergate moment when it was revealed Nixon made tapes.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE (9/3/21): This allegation, that Cohen had gone to Prague, was never proven. McClatchy seems to have been in error. 

The blogger feels stupid for once.

Monday, May 16, 2022

March 31, 2019: Only 29% of Americans Believe the Mueller Report Exonerates the President

 

3/31/19: While President Trump has been bragging about how the Mueller report offers “total exoneration” in the Russia probe, a new poll shows that only 29% of Americans believe he’s in the clear. 

Four of ten say he’s not; and three of ten aren’t sure. 

Trump’s overall numbers on the topic are boosted in large part by the 64% of Republicans who think Mueller cleared his name – most of whom wouldn’t have believed Trump colluded with the Russians even if Mueller had turned up evidence of multiple Trump campaign aides having secret meetings with agents of the Russian Federation offering dirt on Hillary Clinton. And evidence that other campaign advisers suggested sealing a Trump Tower Moscow deal by offering a free penthouse worth $50 million to Vladimir Putin. And evidence that Trump Sr. and Trump Jr. lied about the purpose of a meeting in Trump Tower with Russians. 

Oh, wait, Mueller and the free press already did turn up evidence of all that. (See: 4/19/19.)



What this man needs is a free penthouse.


Saturday, April 2, 2022

September 1, 2020: Trump is the Worst "Law and Order" President Ever

 

September 1, 2020: Let’s not delude ourselves. Donald J. Trump is the worst “LAW & ORDER” president ever. 

Today, he  traveled to Kenosha, Wisconsin, where he basically talked about how much he loved cops. 

This week he also warned that there were “planeloads of thugs,” dressed in black, flying about the country, landing in “Democratic-run cities,” stirring up rioting, and causing mayhem and bloodshed. 

That sounded nuts.

 

____________________ 

The worst “LAW & ORDER” president we’ve ever had.

____________________

  

Not only is Trump the worst “law and order” president we’ve ever had, he puts Richard M. Nixon and Warren G. Harding to shame. And why should we be surprised? This is the guy who bragged about grabbing women’s pussies – because he could. That’s sexual assault, of course. 

“LAW & ORDER,” Trump style. 

Trump isn’t interested in law or order. Not even common decency. He’s the man who has two pending suits against him, filed by women, one by  Summer Zervos, for defamation and sexual assault. The other was filed by E. Jean Carroll, alleging rape. This is the guy who was accused of rape by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, a 13-year-old virgin at the time of the alleged attack, and listed as “Jane Doe” in court documents. Her claim was supported by “Tiffany Doe,” who said she witnessed four incidents of assault by our now president, with Tiffany also admitting she helped recruit underage girls for Epstein’s sex-abuse ring. That case was dropped in April 2017, when Jane’s lawyer said her client “was fearful for her life.” 

So, for Donald, innocent until proven guilty, at least. 

Still, you get some sense of why the president went out of his way recently to say that he wished Ghislaine Maxwell well. She is, of course, Epstein’s alleged accomplice and main procurer of teen girls.

 

Trump can talk “LAW & ORDER” all he wants. But to use his favorite word, it’s a “scam.” This is the gentleman who defrauded students at his university and had to pay $25 million in restitution. This is the man who stiffed undocumented immigrant workers in the 1980s, and lost a $1.4 million judgment to them, too.

 

 

Trump and his talented “Team of Felons.” 

President Lincoln is famous for assembling what historian Doris Kearns Goodwin calls a talented “Team of Rivals” to serve in his cabinet. Trump will be remembered for assembling a talented “Team of Felons.” As Citizen Trump, he had already revealed his preferences by hiring Felix Sater, a convicted felon when Trump put him on the payroll. It was Sater who later suggested that if they hoped to close the Trump Tower Moscow deal in 2016, that they gift Vladimir Putin a suite in the proposed building. It was a perk worth $50 million. There’s your “law and order.” 

Putin is a man guilty of a wide array of crimes, including bilking the Russian people out of tens of billions of dollars. If anyone dares complain, he has them arrested, if they’re lucky, poisoned if they persist. 

On an international front, since taking office, and even before, Trump has cozied up to some of the bloodiest killers on the planet, people for whom “law and order” means the authoritarian state dominates the lives of citizens, starting in the cradle, continuing to the grave. At a campaign rally in Raleigh, N.C., in July 2016, Donald revealed his colors. He admitted that Saddam Hussein was a “bad guy.”   

“But you know what he did well?” Trump asked the crowd. “He killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn’t read them the rights. They didn’t talk. They were terrorists. It was over.” 

It was. 

It was over for more than 5,000 Kurds, mostly women and children, when the Iraqi dictator ordered his air force to gas their town. It was over for all the brave Iraqis who protested against every kind of human rights abuse. They were beaten, raped, and tortured, and finally murdered in their cells. 

“LAW & ORDER,” Saddam style.

 

Since rising to the highest office in the land, Trump has continued to cozy up to the world’s worst dictators. When Bill O’Reilly warned a newly-elected president that Putin was a “killer,” Trump showed disdain for simple justice and the rule of law. “What?” he replied. “You think we’re so innocent?” 

And it was telling, too, that the president had agreed to sit down for an interview with a journalist he knew as an ally, working for a network run by Roger Ailes, Trump’s good friend.

 

 

A bizarre affinity for monsters. 

Both men would eventually be ousted, after women who worked at Fox came forward and made it clear O’Reilly and Ailes had long abused their power and been guilty of all manner of sexual harassment. 

Trump is the guy who said later that O’Reilly, who had already paid several multi-million dollar settlements, shouldn’t have settled. 

And, of course, while still a candidate, Trump said that he had always found Ailes to be “a very, very good person.” 

Whereas many of the women who worked at Fox News soon made it clear: Ailes was a predator.



Roger Ailes - Trump's kind of guy.

 

Since taking office, Trump has shown a bizarre affinity for monsters. He has called the murderous Kim Jong-un a “friend,” and talked about the “very beautiful letters” Kim has sent him. Meanwhile, the North Korean dictator has continued to slaughter his critics and starve his people. Trump commended Rodrigo Duterte, the President of the Philippines, for the “unbelievable job” he was doing on the “drug problem” in his country. Duterte’s secret, according to multiple human rights watchdogs? He had his police summarily execute alleged dealers, their clients, innocent bystanders, and political opponents who complain about his tactics. Later, Trump defended Mohammed bin Salman, after the Saudi leader ordered a journalist assassinated and sliced into pieces. President Trump called him a friend, too; and he called Xi Jinping, China’s president, as corrupt a communist kleptocrat as ever walked the planet, both a “friend” and “an incredible guy.” Xi recently brought “LAW & ORDER” to Hong Kong. 

That is: If you are a really big fan of stifling the free press, and sending in the military to crush dissent.

 

This president doesn’t care about law and order, except when he thinks he can scare his base, and guarantee he wins reelection. He’s the guy who has one son fighting a subpoena, demanding he appear in court and testify in a fraud investigation. Three of his children (Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric, again) were banned from doing charitable work, after a pattern of questionable spending was revealed at the Trump Foundation. My favorite example would be the decision to spend $10,000 in charitable donations on a massive painting of … Donald J. Trump. 

 

Crookery introduced like a virus. 

Having made crookery a staple of his business career, Trump brought crookery to his campaign, and introduced it like a virus to the White House. This particular germ tended to kill honest public servants. Felons, including those who were already felons when they were hired, those convicted since, and alleged felons, include Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Gen. Michael T. Flynn, George Papadopoulos, and George Nader. Nader was already a felon when he went to work for the campaign, having been convicted of child sex trafficking in 1991. He has since been indicted on additional child-pornography-related offenses. He pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years in prison. Steve Bannon, a mastermind of the 2016 campaign, was indicted in August, as part of an alleged fraud scheme. To add insult to legal injury, that scheme is said to have involved stealing money from the poor MAGA-hatted crowd who elected Trump, and thought Mexico would pay for the wall. 

Innocent until proven guilty, again, in Bannon’s case, but good Lord, do we see a pattern yet? 

Felons stick together, like the proverbial birds, and do what felons do. Trump and Nader helped win a massive contract for Elliott Broidy, to perform security work for the United Arab Emirates. That contract was worth as much as $200 million. And who wouldn’t be tempted to break a few laws for that kind of money? Breaking the law was kind of a habit for Broidy. He had already committed a few felonies, a decade earlier. To be fair, Broidy copped to one, that felony involving bribing four New York State officials, at a cost of $1 million. In return they granted him investment control over a huge slice of the state employees’ pension funds.

 

The crimes Trump’s campaign crew committed were many and varied. There is no record that anyone, behind the scenes, ever talked seriously about “law and order.” Manafort earned most of his felonies for work he performed for shady Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs, including Oleg Deripaska, this work having been done before he joined Team Trump. Fittingly, Deripaska, a Russian businessman, had been banned from travel to the United States over his role in an international money-laundering scheme. Manafort would then earn a “bonus” felony, one of ten he piled up in court, for witness tampering during the Russia investigation. 

In fact, he was so inclined to continue waltzing down a rewarding criminal path that the judge in his case refused to grant bail. 

Roger Stone also piled up the felonies, seven in all, including one for lying to Congress during the Russian investigation. Then he added a cherry felony to his six scoop-sundae by trying to intimidate a witness. 

Trump’s personal lawyer for more than a decade, Michael Cohen, racked up eight felonies. Most of those were earned in service to Donald, himself. Those counts included tax evasion and campaign finance violations, including payoffs to a porn queen, one Playboy bunny, a Trump Tower doorman – and good god – a second Playboy bunny. The first three were meant to protect Trump’s reputation, such as it was, during the run-up to the 2016 election. The last payoff, a $1.6 million whopper, went to silence a Playmate who alleged she had been impregnated by Mr. Broidy, and keep her from talking about their affair and a subsequent abortion.   

And lest we forget: the indictment filed in Cohen’s case mentioned a co-conspirator, labeled “Individual 1.” 

Trump.

 

Before moving on, we should mention two more indicted individuals: Konstantin Kilimnik and Natalia Veselnitskaya. Kilimnik worked closely with Manafort during the time the latter ran Trump’s 2016 campaign. In a recently-released, bi-partisan report from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, Kilimnik is referred to as a Russian secret agent, and Manafort as “a grave counterintelligence threat.” 

Veselnitskaya famously met with Manafort, Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower in June that year. The meeting was arranged after she claimed she could offer dirt on Hillary Clinton. 

Sadly, both Kilimnik and Veselnitskaya are currently beyond the reach of U.S. law, having absconded to Russia. 

 

I’m sorry this post can’t be read in Braille. 

If there has ever been a more criminally-inclined, anti-law-and-order bunch to lead this nation, I am not aware. And I taught American history for decades. Trump is the first president, to my knowledge, to step in repeatedly and overturn punishments ordered by U.S. military courts. He’s the only president ever to call the military justice system a “disgrace.” Trump has repeatedly put a thumb on the scales and tried to tip it one way or the other, something normal presidents try not to do. He suggested two different U.S. soldiers, Chelsea Manning, and Bowe Bergdahl, were guilty of treason, the fit punishment being execution. He has called for swift and harsh punishment for criminals facing trial in civilian courts, too, and called a jury verdict he considered too lenient a “travesty of justice.” 

Even before he ran for office, his “law and order” instincts were warped and dangerous. He liked to refer to people accused of crimes as “animals,” even though the “animals” often proved innocent. He once demanded death for the Central Park Five. Those young African American men were, indeed, convicted for their part in a brutal rape and the near-fatal beating of a white female jogger. 

It took years to clear their names; but cleared they were. If Trump had had his way, five innocent men would have been dead.

 

Donald J. Trump is to “law and order” as Al Capone is to “paying taxes.” Trump has been battling doggedly to keep his own tax records hidden from prying eyes. He and his legal team battled all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to fight a request for documents. That request is part of – yes – another fraud investigation, filed by the State of New York. The Supreme Court swatted away his arguments in one case and gave only temporary relief in the other. 

Who is this guy? Trump is the guy who pardoned one felon (Stone), because that felon never ratted him out. 

Trump is the guy who tried to stop another felon who served him (Cohen) from writing a book about his experiences. When that felon was released from prison, as part of an effort to clear inmates out of cells in the face of spreading COVID-19 infection, the Trump administration ordered him back to prison, unless he agreed to take a deal. That deal? Stop talking about the book and stop working on it and you can remain free. Cohen refused. He filed suit. A federal judge ruled in his favor, saying his First Amendment rights had been violated.

 

Look. If you still don’t see the trend, I’m sorry my post can’t be read in Braille. Trump showed his stripes again, when two congressman, Duncan Hunter (and his wife) and Chris Collins, early supporters of Trump’s run for office, were indicted in separate cases. Hunter and his wife were nailed for stealing campaign funds. Collins got arrested and charged with insider trading. 

This prompted the president to fire off an angry tweet: 

Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......

 

In other words, Trump wasn’t interested in law and order so much as protecting his pals. He called Sessions, his pick for Attorney General, “weak” for ignoring his wishes. Duncan Hunter has since been sentenced to eleven months in prison, while his wife got off with eight months of home confinement, largely because she flipped on her sticky-fingered hubby. Collins pled guilty, as did his co-defendants, Cameron Collins, his son, and Steven Zarsky, father of Cameron Collins’ fiancée. 

And if you’re keeping track, those cases would represent five wins for true law and order, and zero for Trump. 

Law & Order:    5 

Trump:              0

 

The list of examples to prove the central point could be continued for as long as a diligent reader could stand, that central point being that this president cares no more about “law and order,” or even the rule of law, than guys like Kim Jong-un and Putin and the bone-sawing types. We just happen to be fortunate that we live in a country where the rule of law applies, and where even a president’s worst instincts (so far) have been checked. And those instincts are starkly manifest. 

Trump has called the U.S. system of justice itself “a disgrace.” When the lower courts go against him, he attacks judges. He called one judge who ruled against him “a hater.” He said the judge was biased because he was “Mexican.” That judge was born in Indiana and went to law school in Indiana too. 

The president has insisted that an array of political foes and even critics should be jailed, despite the fact none have ever been: 

1. Charged with actual crimes.

2. Been granted trial, with a real judge, jury, lawyers for and against, witnesses – you know, the works.

3. Convicted by a jury or plead guilty.

 

These individuals would include, but not be limited to, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, a Clinton aide, financier George Soros, former F.B.I. Director James Comey, Comey’s deputy, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok (an F.B.I. agent guilty of “treason,” according to Trump), Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, flag burners, Steve Rattner, a critic, and the rapper Snoop Dogg. 

Trump has even suggested that The New York Times could be guilty of treason for printing articles he doesn’t like. 

“LAW & ORDER,” Hitler style.

 

In fact, a perfect measure of Trump’s lawless instincts would be the fact that he wanted flag burners thrown into prison. This, despite the fact the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in Texas v. Johnson, a 1989 case, that flag burning, just like flag waving (which President Trump loves almost as much as he loves banging porn stars) is just one different form of First Amendment free speech. 

 

A closeted authoritarian, ready to come out. 

This is who and what Trump is. He’s a closeted authoritarian, ready if re-elected to “come out,” in all his flaming glory. 

This is a president who dispatched Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to drum up any dirt he could find related to Hunter and Joe Biden. Rudy is the toady who quickly lined up two men, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, to help. Last October, both were charged with violating straw and foreign donor bans in U.S. political campaigns. And again, we should see patterns. We know Sam Patten, a well-connected Republican fund raiser, pled guilty to arranging for a Ukrainian oligarch and another foreigner to buy $50,000 worth of tickets to one of the Trump inaugural events. To do it they used an American straw purchaser. We know Imaad Zuberi, who donated $900,000 to the inauguration fund, was later indicted and admitted to his own series of felonies. Among other questionable actions, which led to a charge of obstruction of justice, Mr. Zuberi covered up the fact that at least $50,000 “he” donated came from a foreign individual. 

According to CNN, Zuberi also deleted emails related to a number of illegal transactions. Those included “a $5.8 million transfer from a foreign national that came in around the time of his [$900,000] political donation.”

 

So it goes, in the fun-house mirrors world of Donald J. Trump. You have a president who praises a member of Congress for body-slamming a British reporter. That lawmaker, Greg Gianforte, first claimed he didn’t slam anyone. Then witnesses said he did. Gianforte pled guilty eventually, got slapped with a misdemeanor, and had to pay several thousand dollars in restitution. This was reminiscent of Candidate Trump offering to pay the legal fees for a supporter who sucker-punched a demonstrator at one of his rallies. That man was also charged with assault – which is perilously close to the exact opposite of being for “law and order.” 

Look, this isn’t “Fake News,” just because, if you like Trump, you don’t like what you’re reading. 

This blogger simply keeps track.

 

So, here’s a little more of what I know, and the average Trump voter should, but doesn’t. After Matthew Heimbach, an avowed white supremacist, assaulted an African American woman at yet another Trump rally, his lawyer claimed Heimbach should not be held to account. His client had “acted pursuant to the directives and requests of Donald J. Trump,” who had been working hard to stoke hate. When Cesar Altieri Sayoc Jr. sent bombs to Joe Biden, Barack Obama and CNN, his lawyer asked the judge for leniency. His client, he said, saw President Trump as a “father figure.” When three Kansas men were convicted of plotting to blow up the homes of Somali immigrants, who happened to be Muslim, and attack a mosque, their lawyers also blamed the President of the United States. As one defendant’s attorney explained, 

As long as the Executive Branch condemns Islam and commends and encourages violence against would-be enemies, then a sentence imposed by the Judicial Branch does little to deter people generally from engaging in such conduct if they believe they are protecting their countries from enemies identified by their own Commander-in-Chief.

 

I don’t make this up. I keep track. Who was the federal prosecutor, for example, who let Jeffrey Epstein off on a single count of soliciting prostitution in 2008? That sweetheart plea deal, when dozens of young women had already come forward to complain, allowed Epstein to abuse girls for another decade. That prosecutor would be Alex Acosta, chosen by Trump to serve as his first Secretary of Labor. 

This is no “law and order” crew. Can you remember which Trump cabinet official had to resign after racking up more than $1 million in unauthorized travel expenses and sticking taxpayers for the tab? What other cabinet member resigned in the face of at least a dozen investigations into abuse of power, including for financial gain? Which cabinet official still has hundreds of millions of dollars stashed in banks on the island of Cyprus, where money-laundering is a sport? Finally, what former cabinet member called Donald J. Trump a threat to the U.S. Constitution, and accused him of ignoring the fundamental concept of “Equal Justice Under the Law?” 

Those cabinet members would be, in order, Tom Price, Scott Pruitt, Wilbur Ross and Gen. James Mattis, the latter the only one honest enough to quit in disgust.

 

This is exactly who Donald J. Trump is. He’s not about “LAW & ORDER” and never will be. He might scare his base into believing that he’s the only person who can stop the rioting in places like Portland and Kenosha – and crush legal protesting too. He won’t even admit the difference, and doesn’t care that there is. 

Just this week the president defended the actions of a young 17-year-old man, Kyle Rittenhouse, who has been charged with murder. Rittenhouse is alleged to have killed two Black Lives Matter protesters, and wounded a third. None, as far as we know, were armed. But Trump has already made up his mind, which means he pressed his thumb down hard on the scales of justice. Trump said on TV that Rittenhouse was “violently attacked,” basing his opinion solely on a bit of tape he had watched. Had the young man not fired, Trump suggested, “he probably would have been killed.” So, now we know. If a teen with an AR-15, a weapon he’s not legally allowed to own, opens fire on people without weapons, then, sure. Call it self-defense. 

And watch out for imaginary thugs on imaginary planes.

 

In the end, the most dangerous thug in the United States today is the President of the United States.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE: Given Trump’s warped sense of what “law and order” really means, we should hot have been surprised when his fans rioted on January 6, and tried to stop the certification of the final electoral vote count.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE #2: In fairness, we should note, however, that Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a jury in November 2021. 

In fact, it turned out one of the three men he shot did have a pistol.