Showing posts with label Spygate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spygate. Show all posts

Monday, June 6, 2022

May 24, 2018: Trump Thinks People Who Protest in Ways He Doesn't Like Shouldn't Be in the Country

 

5/24/18: Let’s get another day in Trumpistan off to a rousing start. Fox & Friends is running a taped interview with the president. He’s stoked to hear the NFL will fine players who kneel during the National Anthem! 

After all, nothing says, “I love the land of the free, and the home of the brave” more than squelching the right to protest. 

The NFL does say players can remain in their locker rooms if they prefer. 

Trump can’t talk long before making it clear how he feels about the rights of those with whom he disagrees. “Well, I think that’s good,” he tells the three hosts, Larry, Curly, and Ainsley, referencing the fines. “I don’t think people should be staying in locker rooms. But still, I think it’s good.” 

Then Trump takes it ten steps too far. “You have to stand proudly for the national anthem, or you shouldn’t be playing, you shouldn’t be there. Maybe you shouldn’t be in the country.” 

 

“SPYGATE - a terrible thing!” 

Trump doesn’t have much chance to celebrate the news because he has a spy problem on his hands or in his head. In Trump’s muddled thinking, the F.B.I. and other federal agencies were spying on his campaign. He tweets out “evidence,” which often means he’s making it up. 

At 7:21 we get: “Clapper has now admitted that there was Spying in my campaign. Large dollars were paid to the Spy, far beyond normal. Starting to look like one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history. SPYGATE - a terrible thing!”  

The meeting between members of Congress and representatives of the U.S. intelligence community, to get to the bottom of this Spygate mess, is on for later. (See: 5/23/18. Trump has already told the same lie about what Clapper said.)

 

* 

BEFORE THAT MEETING can take place, Trump learns another lesson. Diplomacy, like love, is hard. 

The much-ballyhooed June 12 summit with North Korea is canceled. 

Here, your favorite blogger should be clear. He would not fault Trump on most foreign policy matters, were Trump not so gleeful in bashing predecessors for “failures” identical to his own. Trump will take credit for every step forward the United States makes on any front. He will blame everyone else for any step back. 

This much is true in 2018 and has been true for years: None of the options to contain Kim Jong-un’s rogue regime are good. Trump is simply the latest U.S. president to discover that fact. 

____________________ 

History shows that diplomacy is always messy and complex.

____________________ 

 

This blogger would point out that history shows that diplomacy is always messy and complex. The Spartans and Athenians could not resolve their differences 2,500 years ago. The Peloponnesian War dragged on for twenty-seven years. The Israelis and Palestinians can’t settle their differences today. And, despite Jared Kushner’s best efforts, they won’t anytime soon. North Korea has been a nettle for the U.S. to grasp since attacking South Korea on June 1, 1950. 

This is the way the world works, always has worked, and always will work. Diplomacy is hard. 

China has been both an active and silent actor in what is a long-running play. In the winter of 1950, the Chinese sent hundreds of thousands of troops crashing across the Yalu River and smashed into American, South Korean and U.N. forces. Harry Truman was the first president to learn that North Korea, backed by China, would present a challenge to the interests of the United States. 

It may still prove that Trump and his team have a good backup plan despite the cancelation of talks, that perhaps back channel movements are likely. Still, it’s hard not to laugh at a fool like Trump, who wants nothing so much as to be praised. Gone for now is his chance at a Nobel Peace Prize, which, if you believe the Big Orange Buffoon, everybody was saying he deserved. 

In order to cancel the summit, Trump sends the following letter to the Chairman of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea:

 

 

Like a weird breakup letter. 

The missive reads like a weird breakup letter. “I felt a wonderful dialogue was building up between you and me,” Trump writes. “I look very much forward to meeting you” someday, the lovesick U.S. leader moans. He can’t forget Kim’s “beautiful gesture” when the romance seemed strong. He can’t believe the “tremendous anger” now directed his way. 

Like a jilted lover, Trump makes his deepest feelings clear. If he can’t have Kim, no one can! He’ll blow him to bits. “You talk about your nuclear capabilities, but ours are so massive and powerful that I pray to God they will never have to be used.” 

Of course, there’s a reason no nation has exploded an atomic bomb on an enemy in 73 years. If we use our “massive” nuclear arsenal we’re going to roast millions of men, women, and children. Most would be innocent human beings who don’t like Kim any more than good Americans do. 

Kim has the capacity to hit targets in the continental United States, which is new, and not Trump’s fault. Yet we must remember, previous presidents had to consider a similar dilemma. They knew Kim had the ability to turn Seoul (and possibly Tokyo) into a smoking hole in the ground. The only difference between 2006, when North Korea got its first nuclear bomb, and 2018, is that Los Angeles is now in range. 

But at least we’ve got a few cool medallions (coined before the meeting was canceled) we can toss and flip. 

Naturally, they show Trump’s face. (See: 6/1/18.)

 

 

* 

WITH HOPES for a Nobel dashed, Trump can console himself knowing there’s a meeting scheduled to consider spying on his campaign. 

 

“Nothing particularly surprising.” 

According to the propaganda people at Fox News, this meeting will allow Congress to get to the bottom of the Spygate mess. For some odd reason, Democrats in Congress think they should attend. 

One meeting becomes two. 

Devin Nunes and Trey Gowdy attend the first. Speaker Paul Ryan tags along. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, F.B.I. Director Christopher Wray, and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats arrive. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, has secured a seat, after Democrats point out that Trump’s interest in “total transparency” (see: 5/23/18) might be more believable if members of both parties were allowed to take part. 

But then the tale takes an odd twist. Remember, this is a meeting called because Congress has a duty to exercise oversight over the Executive Branch. To the surprise of nearly everyone, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Trump defense lawyer Emmet Flood appear. 

Flood is indubitably not a member of Congress. He has no reason to be sitting in a meeting such as this, unless to get the scoop on what investigators might know about his boss. 

And if Congress is trying to ensure proper oversight over the Executive Branch, why is Kelly there? 

Kelly and Flood, at least according to White House Press Secretary Pinocchio, speak briefly and leave. 

A Republican congressional staffer, hearing they appeared, says, “That’s the craziest shit I ever heard.”

 

A second meeting is required because several top congressional leaders were unable to attend the first. Those present are Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer for the Democrats, Nunes again, Sen. Mark Warren, a Democrat, and Sen. Richard Burr and Sen. Milksop Mitch for the Republicans. The same three intelligence heads give a similar briefing to the group. 

On Fox News, soon after, Brett Baier asks Milksop Mitch to describe the meeting just ended.  

“Were you surprised by what you learned?” Baier wants to know. Were there, like, dozens of spies!!!! 

“Nothing particularly surprising,” Milksop replies. “But again, it was classified, so there’s no real, no real report I can give to you.”

 

* 

MEANWHILE, DETAILS about the idiocy and mendacity of President Trump continue to spill out. 

Two days ago, after watching too much cable news, Trump claimed the F.B.I. informant who talked to three members of his campaign had been paid “a massive amount of money … many times higher than normal” to spy on his campaign. That informant, now revealed to be Stefan Halper, looks a lot less suspicious if one turns off the television and searches for truth. As Politifact notes, his biography impresses. Halper is “professor emeritus at Cambridge University in England where he lectures on international security issues. He served as deputy assistant secretary of state for Political-Military Affairs in the Reagan administration.” 

At the time he was being paid to talk to three members of the Trump team (see: 5/21/18), he was also working on a study of Russian-Chinese relationships, and Halper was paid by the Pentagon, not the F.B.I. 

The tab for all his work, both “spying” on Trump and doing Pentagon research, came to $244,960. 

Guess how much Halper earned working for the Pentagon from 9/29/2017 to 3/29/2018, while Trump had his fanny planted on his Oval Office throne? Halper earned $411,575 on Trump’s watch.

 

* 

IN RELATED NEWS, the president told allies earlier in the week that he wanted “to brand” Halper a “spy,” not an informant. According to the Associated Press, he told confidants he thought that sounded more ominous, and would stir up his base. Typically, whether he had the facts straight or not, never entered into the calculations of the President of the United States.

May 25, 2018: Spygate, Jade Helm, and Other Right-Wing Obsessions

 

5/25/18: Trump can’t let the “Spygate” story go. On late night television Stephen Colbert labels the matter “Stupidgate.” A former federal prosecutor labels Trump’s disingenuous campaign “Liegate.” 

____________________ 

“The last thing America needs is for its Justice Department to be complicit in this vandalism of democracy.” 

New Jersey Star-Ledger

____________________ 

 

As expected, the president lays out his “case” in a series of idiot tweets. He could stand up at a press conference and explain his concern in detail to the American people. But he’d have to answer probing questions and he’d get mad. Trump hasn’t held a press conference for 461 days. 

Instead, we’re served tweets: 

The Democrats are now alluding to the the concept that having an Informant placed in an opposing party’s campaign is different than having a Spy, as illegal as that may be. But what about an “Informant” who is paid a fortune and who “sets up” way earlier than the Russian Hoax? 

 

Tweet #2: Can anyone even imagine having Spies placed in a competing campaign, by the people and party in absolute power, for the sole purpose of political advantage and gain? And to think that the party in question, even with the expenditure of far more money, LOST! 

Tweet #3: 

“Everyone knows there was a Spy, and in fact the people who were involved in the Spying are admitting that there was a Spy...Widespread Spying involving multiple people.” Mollie Hemingway, The Federalist Senior Editor But the corrupt Mainstream Media hates this monster story!  


 


“Absolute right to do what I want with the Justice Department.” 

The New Jersey Star-Ledger captures the sentiment of that part of the American people still capable of grasping the basic issues in this sordid Trump tale. The Star-Ledger editorial reads in part:  

Confident that he can use the U.S. Department of Justice as his personal chew toy, Donald Trump has again decided that he can trample the thickest red line in American rule of law and that nobody is going to lift a finger to stop him.

 

The president demanded that Justice launch an investigation designed to torpedo another criminal investigation – the one in which Trump is the principle subject, which is probably his most audacious act of obstruction since he fired the FBI director who led another investigation against him. 

 

…this is the same president who said, “I have absolute right to do what I want with the Justice Department,” despite the prevailing consensus that DOJ has operational independence from the executive branch...

 

It’s all very predictable, given the jaw-dropping scorecard of an investigation which Trump has tried to disturb, derail, and delegitimize. Special Counsel Robert Mueller has extracted guilty pleas from Trump’s national security adviser, deputy campaign manager, and foreign policy adviser, and indicted his campaign manager, 13 Russians and 3 Russian companies.

 

Mueller has bagged all that in just 12 months. And he hasn’t even frog-walked Michael Cohen and Roger Stone out of their caves yet, or shown whether Donald Trump Jr. tried to solicit anything of value in all those visits with foreign agents during the 2016 campaign. 

 

…Yet as the special counsel shoves it into fifth gear, the possibilities still seem endless. The last thing America needs is for its Justice Department to be complicit in this vandalism of democracy.

 

* 

MEANWHILE, The New York Times breaks another story. On January 9, 2017, just eleven days before Trump is sworn into office, Michael Cohen, his personal lawyer and fixer (and at the time an employee of the Trump Organization), has another secret meeting at Trump Tower. 

His guests are Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian oligarch, and Vekselberg’s American cousin, businessman Andrew Intrater. No one knows about this tea party until reporters poring through C-SPAN footage notice the two boarding the elevator in the Trump Tower lobby and exiting again half-an-hour later. 

It turns out to be a productive meeting. Cohen gets a $1 million contract to advise his visitors on business opportunities in Trumpistan. Vekselberg and Intrater donate $1.2 million to support Trump inaugural festivities. Vekselberg and Cohen later attend an inaugural ball together. 

You can certainly understand why a Russian oligarch might want to curry favor with a new president, especially one anxious to be curried. With direct ties to Putin, Vekselberg would like nothing better than to see U.S. sanctions lifted. We know, in December 2105, that he attended the same dinner in Moscow where General Flynn spoke. We know Flynn was paid handsomely for his eloquence. We know he forgot to reveal payments from Russian entities as required by U.S. Army regulations. We know Flynn lied to Vice President Pence about another meeting with Russians. We know Vekselberg was stopped at a U.S. airport recently by agents from the Mueller probe. So, if you smell something fishy, your olfactory senses are working. 

This past April, Vekselberg and his companies were specifically sanctioned as a result of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. 

These sanctions led to somewhere between $1.5 billion-$2 billion in Vekselberg’s assets being frozen. 

CNN sent a reporter to catch up to Vekselberg in Moscow. When confronted by questions about payments to Cohen and donations to the Trump inauguration, the Russian oligarch refused to answer.

 

* 

IN OTHER NEWS, Trump straight man, Congressman Louie Gohmert, insists that the president is as pure as the Virgin Mary. Robert Mueller, however, “has protected radical Islamists his whole career.” 


* 

Aliens have taken over the minds of our pets. 

IN OTHER NEWS, Trump straight man, Congressman Louie Gohmert, insists that the president is as pure as the Virgin Mary. Robert Mueller, however, “has protected radical Islamists his whole career.” 

Gohmert offers the theory that the “anthrax scare” which filled the news a few days after the 9/11 attacks, was a diversion. Mueller (then director of the F.B.I.) was “looking for something to take the attention away….” 

In the wake of the terrible 9/11 attacks, media coverage was continuous and profound. No one was “diverted” by the anthrax scare. Most Americans probably don’t remember it even occurred. We all remember that on that terrible day 19 individuals, adhering to a twisted strain of Islam, carried out their murderous attacks. No one “diverted” us from that horrible truth. 

The only people stupid enough to believe Gohmert’s comments are conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, on the right-wing fringe. These are the nuts who think the 9/11 attacks were a government “inside job.” 

In fact, we know Gohmert spoke at length to Jones on his May 18, 2015, show. At the time, Louie was shouting warning about the Jade Helm plot, wherein the Obama administration was going to send federal troops to invade Texas. How would this invasion proceed? There were tunnels. These tunnels were under Walmart stores that had suddenly closed without reason. When it comes to diversionary tactics, Gohmert earned a black belt in bullshit years ago.

 

* 

CONGRESSMAN Adam Kinzinger, like Gohmert a Republican, unlike Gohmert, a war hero and not nuts, appears on CNN. Wolf Blitzer describes him as “a key member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.” A transcript of their talk includes these relevant details, as always emphasis added, unless otherwise noted. 

BLITZER: We got a lot to discuss.

I want to talk about North Korea in just a moment, but first are you concerned at all by this pattern of connections between people in President Trump’s orbit and these Russians, including oligarchs directly linked to Vladimir Putin?

KINZINGER: No. I mean, I don’t really know what to make of any of this stuff, partially because, as I have said from the very beginning, I – Mueller knows what he’s doing….I want him to complete his report. And then I will make a determination based on what he says….



BLITZER: The president is also arguing that the confidential FBI source who was investigating Russian ties of the Trump campaign is actually a spy and he was actually directed by the Obama administration to undermine President Trump.

Does that make sense to you?

KINZINGER: I don’t know. Again, I mean, all I have seen is what I have seen on TV about that.

And then I have seen my colleagues who have been briefed on this. They came out and said they weren’t overly concerned about it, as you played a sound bite from Mitch McConnell. I have not been briefed on it, so I just don’t know. 



BLITZER: The president’s allies, at least some of them, are clearly ramping up their attacks on the special counsel, Robert Mueller, was for a long time the FBI director.

I want you to listen to what your Republican congressman – your Republican colleague Congressman Louie Gohmert told Judicial Watch. Watch this. 

 

(They watch Gohmert spin his yarn.)



BLITZER: When you hear that, what’s your reaction?

KINZINGER: I know Louie, obviously. I like Louie. He’s a good guy.

 

But I disagree with him in this case. I don’t know what case he’s referring to, but I can tell you with pretty good confidence that Mr. Mueller’s not sympathetic to radical Islam. So I think, if there’s any connection that was made, it’s not because of any kind of sympathy by Mr. Mueller. I trust his investigations. I trust his techniques.

 

Indeed, it is possible Mueller’s final report will exonerate President Trump. If Trump is innocent, that should be clear enough.

May 30, 2018: Roseanne Barr and the President Running Neck-and-Neck for "Twitter Nut of the Year"

 

5/30/18: Today’s topic is “Nuts on Twitter.” First up, Roseanne Barr, the suddenly unemployed television star.  

Yesterday she stormed into contention, for “Twitter Nut of the Year,” with a racist tweet comparing an African American woman to a baby born from the union of a Muslim terrorist and an ape. 


____________________ 

Barr and Trump compete in a race to win “Twitter Nut of the Year.”

____________________ 

 

Until that moment, President Trump had “Twitter Nut of the Year” locked up. But a look at the body of Barr’s work marks her as a dark horse candidate to take home this year’s prize. (It’s a trophy of a golden head jammed up a golden ass.) Barr has been all over the place in the past, insulting all manner of individuals and groups. She once told an interviewer that the Pope “owns almost every dollar in the world.” She called Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, “a filthy Nazi whore.” As Vox noted, racist tweets have long been a staple of her feed. Barr referred to Susan Rice, an adviser to President Obama, as “a man with big swinging ape balls.” 

In the same way, there was no conspiracy theory Barr wouldn’t swallow. In March she tweeted about a survivor of the Parkland school shooting. She insisted he performed a Nazi salute during the “March for Our Lives.” Later she had to admit the image she had seen and tweeted about was doctored. Barr offered up Twitter support for Pizzagate conspiracy sites. This was cool, assuming you were a right-wing nut. It was sad if you were the dumb schmuck who believed Hillary was holding children in a pizza parlor basement as part of a child sex ring. Then you, the poor dumb schmuck, would march into said parlor, fire your assault rifle several times at a locked basement door, get arrested and be sentenced to four years in jail. 

Total children found and saved: 0. 

If you tweet your belief in imaginary child sex rings, that’s how you win “Twitter Nut of the Year.”

 

Trump, of course, is a tough Nut to beat but Barr has serious chops. She said Obama organized the Boston Marathon bombing so he could trample gun rights. At one point she called Israel “a Nazi state,” and insisted Zionism was a creation of the Third Reich. That’s like saying General Custer was plotting with the Sioux to get the Seventh Cavalry wiped out.

 

* 

OF COURSE, to become the champion you must beat the champion, and the “Twitter Nut of the Year,” three years running, 2015, 2016 and 2017, has been the President of the United States. 

Trump gets in another great shot today. With iPhone in hand, he could have tweeted something like: “Roseanne Barr’s comments are totally unacceptable in a diverse country based on the ideal that ‘all men and women are created equal.’” He could have posted: “All good people, of all races, religions and ethnic backgrounds deserve to be treated with….” 

Trump tweets instead: 

Bob Iger of ABC called Valerie Jarrett to let her know that “ABC does not tolerate comments like those” made by Roseanne Barr. Gee, he never called President Donald J. Trump to apologize for the HORRIBLE statements made and said about me on ABC. Maybe I just didn’t get the call?

 

That’s how you win the Nut Award: ignore racism and be a whiny bitch about how mean the media is to you.

 

* 

SPEAKING OF WHICH, President It’s-All-About-Me has been tweeting madly about the Mueller investigation all week. 

Last Saturday, he unleashed a flurry of Twitter yelps: 

With Spies, or “Informants” as the Democrats like to call them because it sounds less sinister (but it’s not), all over my campaign, even from a very early date, why didn’t the crooked highest levels of the FBI or ‘Justice’ contact me to tell me of the phony Russia problem?”

 

Okay. Let’s follow the president’s logic. There were “spies.” They were “all over” his campaign. 

No one warned you about the “phony Russian problem?” That would be true – unless you counted James Comey and James Clapper who spoke to him about the investigation on January 6, 2017. And you probably should count Sally Yates, who came to the White House on January 26, six days after he took the oath of office, to warn that General Michael Flynn, the man he chose as his National Security Adviser, had been lying about contacts with Russians. 

The tweet barking continued: 

Who’s going to give back the young and beautiful lives (and others) that have been devastated and destroyed by the phony Russia Collusion Witch Hunt. They journeyed down to Washington, D.C., with stars in their eyes and wanting to help our nation...They went back home in tatters! 

 

Such young lives ruined! Michael Flynn, pled guilty, age 59; Paul Manafort, indicted, but still starry-eyed at 69. 

 

Judge Napolitano blows a big hole in the “Spygate” boat. 

Unfortunately, not even some of the regulars at Fox News could support Trump’s absurd comments about spies and infiltrators swarming his campaign. Judge Andrew Napolitano, a legal expert who appears regularly, blew a big hole in Trump’s “Spygate” boat. 

Speaking with Martha MacCallum, he said: 

The allegations from Mayor Giuliani over the weekend, which would lead us to believe that the Trump people think the FBI had an undercover agent who finagled his way into Trump's campaign and was there as a spy on the campaign seem to be baseless – there is no evidence for that whatsoever.

But this other allegation with this professor (whose name we’re not supposed to mention), that is standard operating procedure in intelligence gathering and criminal investigations.

 

The professor Napolitano refers to is the single informant known to have talked to three members of the Trump campaign. (See: 5/24/18.)

 

Rep. Trey Gowdy then all but sank the Spygate boat. He is one of a handful of members of Congress who sat in on meetings with the heads of the F.B.I., Department of Justice and U.S. intelligence agencies earlier this week. This was after Trump demanded investigators provide information about all the “spies” investigating his campaign. Now Gowdy had this to say in an interview on Fox News. First, the F.B.I. routinely used informants, he pointed out: 

I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and that it has nothing to do with Donald Trump…It looks to me like the FBI was doing what President Trump said: “I want you to do, find it out.” President Trump himself in the Comey memos said, “If anyone connected with my campaign was working with Russia, I want you to investigate it.”

 

Sounds to me like that was exactly what the FBI did.

 

What about the idea that Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani had been floating lately, that the president should never sit down with the Mueller team and talk? Gowdy responded, “If he were my client, I’d say if you’ve done nothing wrong, you need to sit down and tell Mueller what you know.”