Showing posts with label Sen. Mitch McConnell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen. Mitch McConnell. Show all posts

Sunday, June 26, 2022

October 2-3, 2017: Slaughter in Las Vegas Elicits "Thoughts and Prayers" Nonsense

 

10/2/17: Saturday night, in Las Vegas, an American citizen, heavily armed with a dozen guns and thousands of rounds of ammo, opens fire on a crowd attending an outdoor concert. When the shooting stops, he has killed 58 and injured 500+. 

It falls on Trump to give a brief speech. He and the First Lady offer “thoughts and prayers.”

Reporters ask Trump if he plans to take any substantive action. “We’ll see,” he smirks. What he really means is, I have no damn clue.


___ 

 

10/3/17: In the wake of the Las Vegas bloodbath, leaders of the GOP do their best to obscure the fact they offer nothing in the way of legislative mitigation. Asked what must be done, Sen. McConnell replies: “I think it’s premature to be discussing legislative solutions, if there are any.” 

____________________ 

“I think it’s premature to be discussing legislative solutions, if there are any.” 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

____________________ 

 

It was premature after the slaughter at Sandy Hook. It was premature after the theater tragedy in Aurora, Colorado. It was premature after the Pulse Night Club massacre. It has been premature too many times to count. 

Speaker Ryan is equally baffled by the question. He probably wants to check with N.R.A. President Wayne LaPierre first. Ryan does tell reporters a bill to make it easier for every man, woman, child, and psychopath to buy silencers is no longer up for a vote. This bill – boosted by lobbyists from the gun industry – and touted by Don Jr. as a health issue (good for our ears) – is now dead. 

Word choice intentional.

Friday, April 1, 2022

September 20, 2020: GOP Senators Suffer Mass Amnesia on Topic of U.S. Supreme Court


9/20/20: Apparently, Republicans in the U.S. Senate have suffered an attack of mass amnesia.

 

____________________ 

“The very balance of our nation’s highest court is in serious jeopardy.” 

Sen. David Perdue

____________________

 

 

With a chance to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court, they prove unable to remember what they said in 2016. That was when President Obama nominated Merrick Garland for a seat left open by the death of Chief Justice Anton Scalia.


 

*

 

IN A VAIN EFFORT to refresh their memories, we provide a list compiled by the blogger’s friend, Constance Ida: 

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas): “It has been 80 years since a Supreme Court vacancy was nominated and confirmed in an election year. There is a long tradition that you don’t do this in an election year.”

 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.): “If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump’s term, and the primary process has started, we’ll wait to the next election.”

 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.): “I don’t think we should be moving on a nominee in the last year of this president’s term  I would say that if it was a Republican president.”

 

Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.): 

The very balance of our nation’s highest court is in serious jeopardy. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I will do everything in my power to encourage the president and Senate leadership not to start this process until we hear from the American people [emphasis added, unless noted otherwise].

 

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa): 

A lifetime appointment that could dramatically impact individual freedoms and change the direction of the court for at least a generation is too important to get bogged down in politics. The American people shouldn’t be denied a voice.  Do we want a court that interprets the law, or do we want a court that acts as an unelected super legislature?  This year is a tremendous opportunity for our country to have a sincere and honest debate about the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system of government.

 

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.): “It is essential to the institution of the Senate and to the very health of our republic, not to launch our nation into a partisan, divisive confirmation battle during the very same time the American people are casting ballots to elect our next president.”

Tillis reiterated
in an August 2016 op-ed in USA Today, writing, “Voters not a lame-duck president should decide the composition of the highest court in the land. … This is about principle, not the person whom President Obama has nominated to fill the vacancy.”  

 

Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.): “In this election year, the American people will have an opportunity to have their say in the future direction of our country. For this reason, I believe the vacancy left open by Justice Antonin Scalia should not be filled until there is a new president.”

 

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.): “The Senate should not confirm a new Supreme Court justice until we have a new president.”

 

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Col.): “I think we’re too close to the election. The president who is elected in November should be the one who makes this decision.”

 

Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio): 

We are in the midst of a presidential election and a vigorous debate within both political parties on the direction of the country, with the election less than nine months away.  I believe the best thing for the country is to trust the American people to weigh in on who should make a lifetime appointment that could reshape the Supreme Court for generations.  This wouldn’t be unusual.  It is common practice for the Senate to stop acting on lifetime appointments during the last year of a presidential term, and it’s been nearly 80 years since any president was permitted to immediately fill a vacancy that arose in a presidential election year.

 

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Alabama): “President Obama is attempting to solidify his liberal agenda by drastically changing the direction of the Court for decades to come. This critical decision should be made after the upcoming presidential election so that the American people have a voice.” 

 

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska): 

The decision to withhold advancement of Mr. Garland’s nomination isn’t about the individual, it’s about the principle. Alaskans, like all Americans, are in the midst of an important national election. The next Supreme Court justice could fundamentally change the direction of the Court for years to come. Alaskans deserve to have a voice in that direction through their vote, and we will ensure that they have one.

 

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.): “I strongly agree that the American people should decide the future direction of the Supreme Court by their votes for president and the majority party in the U.S. Senate.”

 

On February 13, 2016, Senate Leader Mitch McConnell had this to say about filling the seat on the highest court in the land: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” 

(The next swearing in of a president was at that point, in a Leap Year, 342 days away.)



The Founding Fathers would not be amused.

 

* 

ALLOW ME, then, to repost what I wrote in the summer of 2019. There were already hints Justice Ginsburg’s health might force her to step down. Unlike our Republican friends in the U.S. Senate, I happen to have a memory span longer than a snail’s. 

 

My old post:

 

6/17/19: Sen. “Milksop” Mitch McConnell makes it clear. He’s not that interested in the U.S. Constitution. 

You may recall that in 2016, McConnell said he would not allow a Senate confirmation vote on Judge Merrick Garland, President Obama’s pick for a vacant seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama was a “lame duck president.” His pick for the court came too close (March 16, 2016) to the presidential election. Milksop wasn’t going to allow a “lame duck” to fill a seat, even though the Constitution makes no exceptions, when filling judicial positions, for length of time left in a president’s term. 

Obama had (at the time of his nomination) ten months, four days, remaining in the White House.

 

The American people are perfectly capable of having their say on this issue,” McConnell insisted. “So let’s give them a voice. Let’s let the American people decide. The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter when it considers the qualifications of the nominee the next president nominates whoever that might be.” 

What happened next? The American people did decide. The people gave Hillary Clinton 65.8 million votes. 

The people gave Donald Trump 63 million votes. 

The Electoral College gave Trump the win as per the U.S. Constitution but Milksop Mitch had never said, “Let’s give the Electoral College a voice.” 

The next election, in 2018, was a rout, with the people giving Democrats 59 million votes vs. 50.3 million for Republicans. 

So, the people had spoken. Twice. Mitch plugged his ears. Now he says if a vacancy opens on the U.S. Supreme Court in 2020, he’ll allow Trump to nominate a person to fill it and Milksop will be sure his choice gets a vote.

 

“Lame duck” status won’t matter. If Ruth Bader Ginsburg retires from the Court on the morning of January 19, 2021, Trump will nominate son Eric to fill the vacancy and Milksop will hold hearings and a vote that afternoon. Trump could nominate a ventriloquist dummy to sit on the highest court and GOP senators would vote for the dummy. 

McConnell and the Republicans control the U.S. Senate because each state, no matter its population, gets two votes again as the U.S. Constitution intended. The GOP picked up a pair of seats in the 2018 elections. 

Still, the people of the entire country spoke in 2018. Mitch hears only the “people” of certain states. 

And let’s remember what other leading Republicans said in 2016:

 

Sen. Charles Grassley, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee: “The American people shouldn’t be denied a voice.”

 

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan: “We should let the American people decide the direction of the court.”

 

Sen. John Cornyn: 

At this critical juncture in our nation’s history, Texans and the American people deserve to have a say in the selection of the next lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

 

The only way to empower the American people and ensure they have a voice is for the next President to make the nomination to fill this vacancy.

 

Sen. James Inhofe: 

Sens. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid have all made statements that the Senate does not have to confirm presidential nominations in an election year. I will oppose this nomination as I firmly believe we must let the people decide the Supreme Court’s future.

 

Fair enough, to quote Democrats to support the case; but McConnell, Grassley, Ryan, Cornyn and Inhofe were arguing that “We the People” would have to have a voice in the coming election. 

Now, Milksop is arguing that the voice that counts was the Ghost of Elections Past, which smacks of craven hypocrisy.

 

* 

IN AN INTERVIEW five day later (June 24, 2019) Trump owned the hypocrisy. Screw the voice of the people! 

Would he pick a replacement for an opening on the highest court next year? 

“It depends,” he says. “I mean, we have the Senate. We have a great Senate. We have great people. If we could get him approved, I would definitely do it. No, I’d do it a lot sooner than that. I’d do it. If there were three days left, I’d put somebody up hoping that I could get ’em done in three days, OK?” 

Sure, if your goal is an increasingly authoritarian state.

Saturday, March 26, 2022

January 13, 2021: Trump Becomes First Man Ever Impeached Twice

 

1/13/21: With just one week remaining in his first and, hopefully, only term in office, Trump makes history again. 

On a vote of 232 to 197, with nine Republicans and one former Republican voting in favor, and four others abstaining, Lame Duck Don gets impeached a second time. The grounds include violating his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution (see below), inciting a deadly riot, and trying to force Georgia officials to overturn certified election results. (See: 1/2/21 and 1/10/21.)

 

____________________ 

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” 

Oath or affirmation required of all presidents

____________________

  

Future school history books will describe the impeachment process, as set up under the U.S. Constitution, and will include a picture of this guy:



 

Senate Majority Leader McConnell, releases a statement. “The Senate process will now begin at our first regular meeting following receipt of the article from the House,” meaning when the Senate is back in session January 19. He also admits that he is open to voting for conviction.

 

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer asks McConnell to bring senators back into session immediately. 

McConnell declines.

 

If you have any brains in your head, you should understand that Loser Don deserves to be impeached, even if it might prove no more than symbolic in the end. And if you really follow the news, you know he should have been canned when he pressured Ukraine in 2019, and put U.S. national security at risk. 

This second try is different, though, because even many Republicans have awakened. Rep. Liz Cheney, the third-ranking member of the party in the U.S. House of Representatives, issues a blistering statement to explain why she voted in support of Trump’s removal from office. 

Referencing the shocking attack on Capitol Hill, she writes: 

Much more will become clear in coming days and weeks, but what we know now is enough. The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing.

 

None of this would have happened without the President. The President could have immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence. He did not. There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution.

 

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Air Force veteran, also votes to impeach. “There is no doubt in my mind that the President of the United States broke his oath of office and incited this insurrection,” he says in a statement. “So in assessing the articles of impeachment brought before the House…if these actions – the Article II branch inciting a deadly insurrection against the Article I branch – are not worthy of impeachment, then what is an impeachable offense?” 

Rep. John Katko of New York is equally clear: “It cannot be ignored that President Trump encouraged this insurrection.” 

Certainly, the risk for Republicans who vote to impeach is great, but not the political risk alone. Rep. Pete Meijer, 33, of Michigan, newly-elected, and a Republican, becomes the target of death threats when he is the only freshman in his party to vote to impeach Donald John Trump. 

“We realize that was a vote we cast that put our safety at risk and going forward, I am expecting there will likely be more political violence,” said Meijer. “So my expectation and the expectation of some folks I’m talking to who are trying to vote our conscience on this, there will be folks that try to kill us, and that’s something we have to grapple with every day.” 

 

Rep. Meijer noted that one GOP colleague told him that he or she wanted to vote to uphold Biden’s electoral win. Concern “about the safety of that individual’s family” dissuaded him or her from taking the risk. “That is where the rhetoric has brought us,” Meijer said with sadness. 

“That is the degree of fear that’s been created.” 

The same pressures will be there when the upper house receives the fresh impeachment resolutions and Republican senators decide to vote. In the U.S. Senate, Ben Sasse has said he is considering a “yes” vote. 

Sen. Mitt Romney is likely to vote to impeach, since he was the only Republican the first time to agree that Trump should be removed.

 

* 

IN AN OPINION PIECE for the Daily Beast, former aide and confidant to the First Lady, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff savages her former boss and longtime friend (she attended Melania’s wedding and the baby shower preceding the birth of Barron, Mrs. Trump’s only child). 

Wolkoff calls the attack on January 6 “shocking, awful, disheartening and shameful.” 

“It was an assault on human life and our great democracy,” she continues. “Unfortunately, our president and first lady have little, if any, regard for either.” The Trumps, writes Wolkoff, “lack character, and have no moral compass. Although my intentions to support the first lady in the rollout of her initiatives were always pure, I’m disheartened and ashamed to have worked with Melania.” 

And so it goes.

 

* 

MEANWHILE, with right-wing groups still threatening violence to come, 25,000 U.S. troops have been sent to Washington D.C. to keep the peace. 

Today, Rep. Brian Mast led National Guard troops on a tour of the Capitol. Mast, a Republican who lost both legs in combat, thanked Guard personnel for their service. At the same time, troops were warned that extremist groups promising to protest the election might deploy improvised explosive devices (IED’s) in the nation’s capital. So the soldiers should be vigilant. 

Good news: President Trump gets our fighting men and women mostly out of Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Bad news: President Trump’s own actions make it necessary to deploy our fighting men and women in America’s streets.

 

* 

Handcuffed, as it were, to the insurrectionists by their own words and false claims of massive voter fraud, the worst of the worst of the GOP (generally speaking, those most tied to Trump) did their best to slip the restraints. With evidence piled high against them, their only choice was to go for misdirection. There were the usual high points and low points during the House impeachment debate. One of the lows came when Rep. Ken Buck (R-Co.) tried to defend President Trump’s conduct leading up to the riot by pointing out that “the socialists in Hollywood” had been mean to the president all along. Robert DeNiro, Buck complained, had said “he wanted to punch the president in the face.” And poor Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had been asked to leave a restaurant in Virginia before she and her family were served. 

So, rioting on Capitol Hill? A policeman killed and scores injured. A president inciting a riot. Sure, Sanders not getting to order her entre. Just as bad. 

If Rep. Buck was pathetic, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, elected to Congress for the first time in November, from the Fourteenth Congressional District of Georgia, was an idiot, grabbing as much spotlight as she could. 

Rep. Greene announced that she would introduce impeachment charges against President Biden on January 21.

 

Other Trump supporters have been reduced to denying that Trump supporters were involved in the January 6 attack at all. No less a political weaselˆˆ than Rep. Matt Gaetz has peddled the myth that the attack was the work of leftist Antifa radicals. This line of elephant poo was cleaned up today, during debate on the Articles of Impeachment. Just minutes after Gaetz stood in the House of Representatives to repeat that brazen lie, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy shot it down. McCarthy made it clear he did not support an impeachment charge. 

Still, his explanation was in no way a defense of the president. Trump, he said, bore “responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters. He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding.” 

“Some say the riots were caused by antifa. There is absolutely no evidence of that,” Rep. McCarthy added. “Conservatives should be the first to say so.” 

McCarthy also admitted that it was not “the American way” to contest a fairly-decided election. “Let’s be clear, Joe Biden will be sworn in as president of the United States in one week because he won the election.” 

Amen.

 

(ˆˆNote: This writer tries at all times to avoid the use of dehumanizing language. In the case of Rep. Gaetz, labeled a “political weasel” above, a rare exception may be justified. That is, while he is still a human being in good standing, in terms of his politics he is a “weasel.” 

I’m not sure this meets my standard; but I let it pass here. I believe Gaetz is the kind of person who would have followed Hitler or Fidel Castro or any dictator, had he lived in their time and place, and thought he would benefit if he did.)