Friday, April 29, 2022

September 30, 2019: Trump Blasts the Whistleblower - IG Defends Him or Her

 

9/30/19: Monday proved to be another grim day for Team Trump, as September drew to a humiliating close. 

True. Home sales were up. Unemployment figures were great. The stock market was strong. In several respects, the economy was thriving.

 

____________________ 

“Including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct.” 

Inspector General Michael Atkinson

____________________

 

 

Yet, the president remained stymied on the international front. (Plus, he was about to get his dumb ass impeached!) First, nobody had seen Jared Kushner’s “peace plan” for Israel and Palestine, not even Ivanka. Second, Trump had torn up an existing nuclear deal with Iran. Now, as any fool could have predicted, Iran was pushing back in the Persian Gulf. As for a Nobel Prize, which the president said he’d win, “for a lot of things, if they gave it out fairly,” North Korea remained a nuclear threat fifteen months after he proclaimed North Korea wasn’t. 

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton lambasted the president’s policy toward North Korea to wrap up the month. Whereas, Orange Leader had insisted that Dear Leader was a fine fellow and loved his people and Kim Jong-un was his friend, Bolton told an audience that Kim was the same homicidal maniac he had always been. “It seems to me clear that [North Korea] has not made a strategic decision to give up its nuclear weapons. In fact,” Bolton warned on Monday, “I think the contrary is true…[The] strategic decision that Kim Jong Un is operating through is that he will do whatever he can to keep a deliverable nuclear weapons capability and to develop and enhance it further.”

 

Other voices were speaking out, too. And, as we shall see, Inspector General Michael Atkinson had already shot down a major Trump/Jim Jordan/Lindsey Graham right-wing BS talking point Sunday night. But no one got the message to the president by the time he woke Monday and started tweeting like mad. 

We were soon treated to some of the president’s favorite lines, refurbished for the latest scandal. 

At 6:39 a.m. we had: “The Greatest Witch Hunt in the history of our Country!” 

At 7:03 a.m., Trump assured fans, 

The Fake Whistleblower complaint is not holding up. It is mostly about the call to the Ukrainian President which, in the name of transparency, I immediately released to Congress & the public. The Whistleblower knew almost nothing, its 2ND HAND description of the call is a fraud! 

 


Inspector General Atkinson.


That wasn’t even close to the truth, since the White House initially insisted that the call could not be released. And the Inspector General was about to blow that line of defense to atoms, tidbits, and splinters. Anyone who could read a newspaper, assuming they could still find one, would know that only the dire threat of impeachment pried the complaint from Trump’s paranoid grip. 

 

“Arrest for treason?” 

Still, the unhinged tweets kept coming. Even before most Americans had time to pour milk over their corn flakes, Trump was in full dictator-wannabe mode. At 7:12 a.m., he tweeted this threat: 

Rep. Adam Schiff illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement, pretended it to be mine as the most important part of my call to the Ukrainian President, and read it aloud to Congress and the American people. It bore NO relationship to what I said on the call. Arrest for Treason?

 

(Again, see 9/25/19 and 9/29/30 for context regarding this tweet.)

 

As always, Trump busied himself all morning, bingeing on right-wing news. At 7:43 a.m. he floated an all-caps tweet, based on a story he had just watched, hinting at a nefarious “Deep State” plot supposedly afoot.  

“WHO CHANGED THE LONG STANDING WHISTLEBLOWER RULES JUST BEFORE SUBMITTAL OF THE FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT?” Trump demanded to be told. 

Then: “DRAIN THE SWAMP.” 

As the Inspector General had made clear the night before, there was no “Deep State” at work and no swamp to drain. The president and his allies had dinned it in supporters’ ears that they should ignore the whistleblower complaint. It was nothing more than “hearsay” and “secondhand” info.

 

“Fake News” CNN, however, took the trouble to quote from a statement by IG Atkinson. Was the entire complaint composed of “hearsay” and “secondhand” information and maybe brownie recipes?  

Atkinson’s statement read: 

As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided.

 

It continues: 

Although the Complainant’s Letter acknowledged that the Complainant was not a direct witness to the President’s July 25, 2019, telephone call with the Ukrainian President, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that other information obtained during the ICIG’s preliminary review supported the Complainant’s allegations [emphasis added].

 

Contrary to the president’s claim that rules had been changed, the IG stated that no rules had been changed. A whistleblower had never needed first-hand information before filing a complaint. It would only be necessary for the IG to uncover, within fourteen days, firsthand information to support allegations made. In this case that step was unnecessary. “The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she had both first-hand and other information,” Atkinson explained. 

Trump’s intemperate threats fueled increasing unease. Andrew Bakaj, a lawyer for the whistleblower, reminded the American people that retaliation against any whistleblower was “a violation of federal law.” 

Trump, of course, admitted he had people hard at work in an attempt to uncover the whistleblower’s identity. 

And the identities of anyone who spoke to him or her. 

“We’re trying to find out about a whistleblower,” he told reporters at the end of an Oval Office meeting. He said he wasn’t worried. His call to President Zelensky “was perfect, it was perfect. But the whistleblower reported a totally different statement.” 

“I made a call,” Trump reiterated. “The call was perfect…but the whistleblower made it sound terrible.” His call was “so good,” the president continued, “it was perfect…[and] this whole thing is a disgrace, and there’s corruption, and we’re seeking it. It’s called drain the swamp.”

 

He couldn’t stop babbling. “There’s been corruption on the other side. There’s been corruption on the other [Democrats’] side like you’ve never seen.” Jabbing himself in the chest with a thumb, he insisted, there had been a lot of corruption in Ukraine “against us. And we want to get to the bottom of it, and it’s very important that we do.” 

The problem was clear, if not to Trump. He was the guy who called Ukraine’s president. He was the guy who asked his counterpart to investigate a political opponent. He was the guy who solicited it would appear foreign help in next year’s election. Donald J. Trump was the guy willing to withhold U.S. military aid to force an ally to go along with his scheme. 

 

Nixon was a patriot, at least. 

Former Trump transition adviser J. W. Verret appeared on television to sound alarm. “People have made the analogy to the Nixon-era scandals and Nixon’s resignation, but this is a lot worse than that,” Verret said. “Nixon was a patriot. Of all the crazy things he did, he never would have accepted help from a foreign power for his own personal interest in an election, particularly one that would compromise the U.S.’ strategic interests. This,” situation in Ukraine, “is much worse and I think momentum continues toward impeachment.” 

Sarah Longwell, a Republican strategist and organizer, suggested that, as in the days of Watergate, it might be time for the GOP to cut its losses. 

Dump Trump. 

Presto, President Michael R. Pence! A leader you can be confident won’t be banging porn stars.

October 1, 2019: Trump Brags about Stock Market Gains - Obama Did Better

 

October 1, 2019: A new report shows U.S. manufacturing output has slipped to the lowest level since June 2009. 

The Dow Jones drops 344 points on the news.



Yeah - the Dow Jones went way up.


 

____________________ 

Obama vs. Trump: The tale of the ticker tape.

____________________

 

 

Since Mr. Trump looks at stock market numbers as the ultimate gauge of success, any decline sets his teeth on edge. That means tweeting. And tweeting means stupidity for sure. “You cannot judge my Stock Market performance since the Inauguration,” he insists, “which was very good, but only from the day after the big Election Win, which was spectacular due to the euphoria of getting Obama/Biden OUT, & getting Trump/Pence IN. Went up BIG between Nov. 9 & Inauguration!” 

We have addressed this claim before, due to the fact that Trump continues to misstate basic facts (sometimes known as practicing “Trump Math”). Sadly, his silly supporters believe him every time. 

A person grounded in reality can easily check this out. Starting from the moment Mr. Obama sat down in the White House and ending on January 16, 2017, the last trading day before the end of his second term, the Dow rose 148.3 percent. That would allow Obama to edge out Ronald Reagan, for third best stock market performance under any U.S. president in the last century (not counting Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had nearly twice as long to oversee gains). 

Second place would go to Hillary Clinton’s husband, the philandering fool, William Jefferson Clinton.

 

The gold medal would be draped round the neck of Calvin Coolidge, a staunch Republican of the old, small-government, balanced budget, conservative stripe. You’d probably want to rip it right off, since a few months after he left office the Great Crash of 1929 sent the economy into a tailspin. 

The Great Depression then commenced. 

More recently, Trump and his enablers and the Republican Party, generally, would like you to forget. With George W. Bush steering the ship of state, the markets first boomed. Then busted. The Dow Jones hit 14,165 on October 11, 2007. Then the U.S. economy ran into a hidden reef and started to sink. A massive housing bubble burst. Banks wobbled and went under. Wall Street giants teetered on the edge of ruin. Consumer spending contracted. Auto sales plummeted. By the time Obama was sworn in, the Dow had shed nearly six thousand points.

 

On January 16, 2009, the last trading day before he took over, the Dow stood at 8,291. The skid continued for two more months. On March 9, the market bottomed at 6,547. Or, as Warren Buffett put it, the economy had “fallen off a cliff.” Investors had lost $13 trillion, or 59.9 percent of their money. 

It is true, then, that markets have done nicely under Trump. This blogger, who is heavily invested, is happy about that. 

The markets did better – to this point in Obama’s first term than they have under Trump. 

Frankly, Trump makes this kind of, “the markets were going to crash if Hillary won the election” stuff up. (See: 2/7/20.)

 

I’m a big fan of facts. So, I go to the charts. I’m not turning up an exact figure for October 1, 2011, but based on a comparison chart prepared by macrotrends, by early October in 2011, the Dow Jones was up 49.4 percent with Obama running the show. 

At the same point in his first term in the White House, Trump has the markets up 36.2 percent.

October 2, 2019: Dow Jones Declines on News of Decline in U.S. Manufacturing

 

10/2/19: Still rattled by reports of a decline in U.S. manufacturing output, investors send the Dow down an additional 494 points.




 

October 3, 2019: Trump Will Take Help from China or Ukraine to Win Next Election

 

10/3/19: Today we consider some of the fast-breaking developments in the investigation of President Trump.  

 

____________________ 

“I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.” 

Ambassador Taylor

____________________

 

 

That is, the latest investigation, the one involving his shakedown call to Ukraine. Not the one involving the meeting with Russians and top campaign guys in Trump Tower in June 2016. Or the one where he paid off a porn star and a Playboy Bunny. And not the one about his taxes. Or the one where two dozen women accused him of sexual harassment and Summer Zervos is suing his ass. 

At this point it seems safe to say someone needs to explain the rule of law to Donald J. Trump.

 

We learn that awful truth again this morning when the president strides across the White House lawn and stops to inform reporters that he wants China to investigate a political opponent and his son. 

Yes, Trump fans. Your fat, orange boy just said he’d like a commie government to get the goods on American citizens. 

The president, of course, has been in meltdown mode for more than a week, ever since it dawned on him that his blunders were likely to lead to impeachment. So the rule of law looms larger in import with each passing day. 



Trump would really like this guy to help him win the next election:

President Xi Jinping.


 

A few examples: 

In his latest fury, Trump has suggested that the whistleblower may be guilty of treason. 

He wants to go back to the way it used to be – when the punishment for such a crime was hanging. 

The president has said he wants to know who gave the whistleblower information and says those people are like “spies.” 

Okay, we’ll need more rope. 

The president has called the whistleblower’s complaint a “total fiction” and insists it has no resemblance to the “perfect” call he made to the president of Ukraine. And he has, naturally, squirreled the transcripts of that call away, where only his aides and maybe FLOTUS can see them. 

Unfortunately, if we’re trying to explain reality to the American people, it doesn’t help that only 40% of Republicans think Trump mentioned Joe Biden and his son during the Ukrainian call. Here, we can definitively say, that if Republicans would read the call memorandum released by the White House, that number would shoot up to 92%, assuming the rest had crippling comprehension problems.




Six out of ten Republicans are woefully ill-informed.


 

* 

Mike Pompeo “forgets” he was on the July 25 call. 

IN THE MEANTIME, our tangerine-tinted leader has been on a roll. He fumed that Chairman Adam Schiff of the House Intelligence Committee (now nicknamed “Shifty Schiff”) should also be booked for “treason” because he misquoted Trump’s words in the call to President Zelensky. 

Again, the penalty for treason would be death. Or as Trump might call it, “Bringing jobs back to the rope factory.” 

He also told reporters “a whistleblower should be protected, if the whistleblower is legitimate.” But the whistleblower who lodged a complaint against him is “a so-called whistleblower,” “biased” and “a political hack.” 

So: No protection for him or her! 

(Death by hanging again?)

 

In a snippet of positive news, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) pushed back on that idea – that only a whistleblower with the seal of approval from Trump should expect protection and anonymity. In a statement he released on his U.S. Senate website, Sen. Grassley explained: 

This person appears to have followed the whistleblower protection laws and ought to be heard out and protected [emphasis added]. We should always work to respect whistleblowers’ requests for confidentiality. Any further media reports on the whistleblower’s identity don’t serve the public interest even if the conflict sells more papers or attracts clicks….

 

When it comes to whether someone qualifies as a whistleblower, the distinctions being drawn between first- and second-hand knowledge aren’t legal ones. It’s just not part of whistleblower protection law or any agency policy. Complaints based on second-hand information should not be rejected out of hand, but they do require additional leg work to get at the facts and evaluate the claim’s credibility.

 

In not-so-good “rule of law” news, President Trump clearly missed what Sen. Grassley said. Today, he stated publicly, without there having been a trial, that a U.S. citizen, Hunter Biden, received “a payoff” from the Chinese. He said that former Vice President Biden and his son were guilty of corruption in Ukraine. “Nobody has any doubt,” he added. He said – again without evidence – that the whistleblower complaint was no good, because Chairman Schiff “helped him write it.” Ukraine, he told reporters – all but begging a foreign nation to help him out in the 2020 election – should “launch a major investigation” into Joe and his son.

 

Fresh revelations continued to dent the president’s defenses. On September 22, we know Martha Raddatz asked Secretary of State Pompeo what he might know about the July 25 call. Pompeo acted like she had hit him on the head with a croquet mallet and said the call was news to him. 

Apparently, it was quite a whack to the noggin.’ Ten days passed before Pompeo admitted yesterday, Oh, yeah. That call. 

He was listening on that call.

 

At the same time, Rudy Giuliani’s name popped up all over the news. First, he admitted that he had compiled a dossier of material, garnered from Ukrainian sources, “proving” that VP Biden and his son had been up to no good. One impeccable source was Paul Manafort, currently lodged in federal prison. Rudy and Paul communicated through Paul’s lawyer. 

Let’s pause a moment and allow that to sink in. 

We should also throw in some old news to spice up our story. Don’t forget, President Trump said he could pardon himself! And don’t forget, Trump always admitted a pardon remained on the table for Manafort, assuming that Manafort kept his mouth shut about Trump. 

(He did.)

 

* 

Volker cautioned the Ukrainians not to get involved. 

ON THURSDAY, the former U.S. special envoy to the Ukraine testified for hours behind closed doors. Not much information has leaked; but it has been reported that Ambassador Kurt Volker had specifically warned Giuliani that his sources in Ukraine were no good. 

Volker also told lawmakers he cautioned the Ukrainians not to get involved with meddling in the next U.S. election. That supports the whistleblower’s allegation that Volker had “provided advice to the Ukrainian leadership about how to ‘navigate’ the demands that the President made.” 

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), clearly in need of hearing aids, emerged after several hours of testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. He informed reporters that he had not heard a syllable to support the idea that Trump withheld military aid to an allied nation to leverage help in the 2020 election. This, despite the fact Volker supplied text messages involving communications with Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in the Ukraine, and Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union. Sondland, who made a fortune in the hotel business, but had never been a diplomat, got the job by donating $1 million to Trump’s 2016 inaugural committee. 

(That’s fairly standard practice when it comes to awarding ambassadorships to plumb positions: like France or England. Career diplomats get to be ambassadors to countries like Mali or Tuvalu. Or Iraq.)

 

The context of the emails is not entirely clear. But if what ABC is reporting is correct, what Taylor was worried about is obvious: 

(Volker comes in late on the three-way talk.) 

TAYLOR: The nightmare is they give the interview [Team Trump is pressuring Zelensky to go on CNN and mention an investigation into the Bidens] and don’t get the security assistance. The Russians love it. (And I quit.)

 

(A bit of cross talk takes place.)

 

TAYLOR: The message to the Ukrainians (and Russians) we send with the decision on security assistance is key. With the hold, we have already shaken their faith in us. Thus my nightmare scenario.

 

 

TAYLOR (three minutes later): Counting on you to be right about this interview, Gordon.

 

SONDLAND: Bill, I never said I was “right”. I said we are where we are and believe we have identified the best pathway forward. Let’s hope it works.

 

TAYLOR: As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

 

SONDLAND: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop this back and forth by text. If you still have concerns, I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks.

 

TAYLOR: I agree.

 

In other words, Taylor, the professional, thinks it’s clear military aid is being withheld in return for Ukrainian help in a U.S. political campaign. That’s what the whistleblower alleged.

 

Taylor was serving as charge d’affaires to the Ukraine, having taken over that post in June. The previous U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, had been recalled in May, several months early. Giuliani admitted on Thursday, that Yovanovitch was dumped after he told the president she was blocking his attempts to investigate Democrats like former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. 

BIDEN!

Is this difficult to grasp????

 

* 

FINALLY, we learn that a second whistleblower complaint is in the works. This one involves a person working for the I.R.S., who alleges political appointees have interfered with the normal auditing process of Trump’s tax returns.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE: In the email exchanged noted above, Ambassador Sondland states quite clearly that he believes there is “no quid pro quo” involved in the hold on military aid to Ukraine. Republicans will latch onto this statement like barnacles. 

Later, Sondland will say, having heard other witness accounts, that he realizes there was a quid pro quo.

October 4, 2019: For $1,500 Per Ticket, You Can Party with Haters at Mar-a-Lago

 

10/4/19: The weekend arrives! Our beleaguered president has little reason for joy. You’d think Trump would be fine, as unemployment falls to the lowest level in fifty years: 3.5 percent. 

Unfortunately, he has several daunting problems to address. First, North Korea has launched a nuclear-capable missile from a submarine, which this blogger would argue is not Donald J. Trump’s fault. What is his fault, is that he has allowed himself to be played for a chump. Even Trump fans will remember when he claimed, wrongly, that North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat. 

North Korea can now park a sub off the U.S. coast and, in event of war, wipe out any city it might choose.

 

* 

WHEN IT COMES to growing threats, we learn that September was the hottest September ever recorded, just slightly hotter than the record set in 2016. If you weren’t an idiot, you’d be worried, as August was the second hottest August ever, and July was the hottest July. June was the hottest June. 

The problem, of course, is that the president is an idiot. 

Future generations are screwed.

 

*

____________________ 

A practicing Muslim “cannot be a loyal citizen of the United States.” 

ACT America

____________________

  

IN BONUS STUPIDITY, we learn that ACT America, an anti-Muslim group, is planning to hold their gala at Mar-a-Lago in November. Because what better way to say, “I love freedom,” than to host a group that hates not just terrorists, but all Muslim Americans and all Muslims round the world! 

If you are willing to cough up $1,500 per ticket, for ACT America’s party, you can rub elbows with bigtime haters. Michelle Malkin will be there, spewing venom. So will Brigette Gabriel, founder of the group. 

According to the Anti-Defamation League, ACT America “propagates the hateful conspiracy theory that Muslims are infiltrating U.S. institutions to impose Sharia law.” Gabriel’s organization pushes the idea that “headscarves are a sign of radicalization” and claims that “25 percent of Muslims approve of terrorism.” The ADL warns that ACT America has attracted “far-right extremists, including white supremacists and militia group members [emphasis added].”

 

In Ms. Gabriel’s world, the 3.3 million Muslims living in our country are terrorists in waiting. In 2007 she made that position clear, insisting that “a practicing Muslim who believes the word of the Koran to be the word of Allah…who goes to mosque and prays every Friday, who prays five times a day – this practicing Muslim, who believes in the teachings of the Koran, cannot be a loyal citizen of the United States.” If a mosque was built anywhere in America, Gabriel warned, the F.B.I. must be notified. We were to assume that the mosque would be a den of jihadis. 

Last, but not least, Gabriel warned that Muslims were trying to take over our schools, by insisting that if students were taught about different religions, they should be taught about Islam, too. 

At any rate, ACT America will be hosting a party at Mar-a-Lago next month. At least no strippers are involved.



This Muslim American soldier gave his life for this country.

(Something NO Trump has ever done.)


October 5, 2019: The Bromance of Trump and Kim Jong-un May Be Over

 

10/5/19: We know the president is having a tough week. Once again, he retreats to Trump National Golf Club in Potomac Falls, Virginia. There he can hunker down and tweet-hate on other Americans. 

As for the need to hunker, Mr. Trump is feeling the heat of the impeachment investigation. Even a few voices at Fox News have been raised against him, as evidence of shady dealings mounts.



If Trump eats at his place in Potomac Falls, you know he charges the government to feed

himself, and Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, wearing glasses.

 

As a result of recent leaks from his administration, we also learn that Trump “pestered” Shinzo Abe of Japan to recommend him for a Nobel Prize – due to his brilliant success disarming North Korea – which in retrospect seems pathetic and needy. Trump reportedly told the Saudis he’d back them for admission to the G-7, rambled on in conversation with Chinese president Xi about chocolate cake, and made a fool of himself on the phone with world leaders.

 

In fact, much ballyhooed negotiations with North Korea, which began Saturday, ended Saturday. The North said talks broke down because the U.S. brought nothing new to the table.

October 6, 2019: A Bad Weekend for President Trump - But China May Help

 

10/6/19: It’s the weekend. President Trump is not happy. Evidence that supports the decision to pursue an impeachment inquiry accumulates. Even a few brave souls in the GOP are willing to admit it.




 

____________________ 

“It strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated.” 

Sen. Mitt Romney

____________________

 

 

While most Republican lawmakers chose to shelter in place last week, Sen. Mitt Romney made his position plain, after the president called on China to investigate Joe Biden. “When the only American citizen President Trump singles out for China’s investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the Democratic nomination process,” Romney said, “it strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated.” 

Of course, that meant Trump had to go ballistic on Twitter. At 6: 47 a.m. on Saturday, we had this:

Somebody please wake up Mitt Romney and tell him that my conversation with the Ukrainian President was a congenial and very appropriate one, and my statement on China pertained to corruption, not politics. If Mitt worked this hard on Obama, he could have won. Sadly, he choked! 

 

That was followed at 9:17 by this: 

Mitt Romney…is a pompous “ass” who has been fighting me from the beginning, except when he begged me for my endorsement for his Senate run (I gave it to him), and when he begged me to be Secretary of State (I didn’t give it to him). He is so bad for R’s! 

 

Meanwhile, multiple sources told Axios the president had spoken with GOP members of the House of Representatives. Trump told them that even though his July 25 call to Zelensky was “perfect,” he wasn’t to blame for making it. Energy Secretary Rick Perry made him punch the buttons! 

If this was Trump’s attempt to throw Perry under the bus, Perry wasn’t ready to be mashed. He told the Christian Broadcasting Network  that, “as God is my witness,” when he talked to Trump about a call to the president of Ukraine, “neither Joe or Hunter Biden’s name ever came up.” 

Also, he said he would soon be resigning his post. 

Trump’s defenses continued to crack and crumble, including the claim the whistleblower had nothing but second- and third-hand information. We learned there was a third whistleblower – and the second tooting warning regarding Ukraine. This whistleblower had first-hand information that backed up the first. 

 

Democrats rushing to judgment. 

What about the idea that Democrats were rushing to judgment? Down that defense went too. We learned that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wasn’t just “rushing” to judgment. He had his mind made up. In a video shot to solicit campaign donations, Mitch looked square into the camera and intoned, “Nancy Pelosi’s in the clutches of a left wing mob. They finally convinced her to impeach the president.” 

“All of you know your Constitution,” he continued. “The way that impeachment stops is a Senate majority with me as majority leader. But I need your help. Please contribute before the deadline.”

 

Even a far-right plot to smear Sen. Elizabeth Warren goes awry. The story explodes when a 24-year-old Marine, Kevin Ty Whelly, claims to have been having an affair with the senator, a woman nearly three times his age. 

That tall tale is blown to bits when the Marine Corps reveals that the young Lothario, who claimed to have seen combat in Afghanistan, had never been to Afghanistan. As for the Purple Heart Whelly claimed he proudly wore, the Marines noted that Whelly had never been wounded, either. 

So, we can safely assume he never won Sen. Warren’s heart.



 KTW  EW


 

Finally, a ray of sunshine pierced the darkening clouds over the White House. Rapper Kanye West once again defended his support for the man in the Oval Office. West explained that he never based his decisions on skin-color – an admirable position. 

Alas, the singer seriously undermined his own logic, pointing out that it was “the Republican Party that freed the slaves,” meaning he liked Trump because Republicans ended slavery 154 years ago.