Thursday, March 23, 2023

The Porn Star and the President - Part VII

 

The Porn Star and the President – Part VII

(A Story of Lying)



At least one of these people is a known liar - the guy in the hat.


IN PART VI, MICHAEL COHEN, PRESIDENT TRUMP’S PERSONAL LAWYER AGREES TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS. 

NATURALLY, TRUMP TURNS ON COHEN:

 

2/19/19: The president’s unceasing efforts to contain the damage his allies are suffering, and protect his own lard ass continue to fail. 

Cohen is indicted and pleads guilty. Then he agrees to testify before Congress once more – and correct the record. Trump switches from calling Cohen a man he “liked and respected” to labeling him, mafia-style, “a rat.” 

Rudy Giuliani, who had previously insisted Cohen was “an honest man,” suddenly decided he was a “pathological liar.” 

When Trump hinted in a tweet that members of Mr. Cohen’s family might be in legal jeopardy, almost anyone with a basic understanding of how the courts work knew this was tantamount to witness intimidation. The president responded to criticism by saying of his former lawyer, “He’s only been threatened by the truth.” He didn’t deny that Cohen was being threatened.

___ 

 

2/27/19: “Disgraced felon” Michael Cohen is set to testify publicly before the House Oversight Committee. 

It’s interesting to note that the term “disgraced felon” is coming from Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and other White House aides. That makes me wonder. Aren’t all felons “disgraced?”

Or: just the felons who might have dirt on President Trump, both before he took office and after?

___ 

 

March 1, 2019: I’m going to assume you did not have seven hours to invest in watching former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testify before the House Oversight Committee. I’m retired. So, I watched till my eyes bugged out.

 

_______________________ 

In those glory days, Cohen was lying for Trump.

_______________________ 

 

It was hard, while watching, not to imagine that Republicans on the panel were suffering from mass hysteria. They were boiling mad to learn that Cohen had lied to Congress in September 2017, even though they controlled both the House and Senate at the time and could have investigated more thoroughly had they wished. Then again, in those glory days, Cohen was lying for Trump. 

A few observations follow.

 

*

LET’S PICK UP the thread of testimony, allowing for a little literary license, with the first Republican speaking and/or yelling: 

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH): ADMIT IT, MR. COHEN, YOU ARE A LIAR! DID ANYONE EVER TELL YOU THAT? 

Cohen: Yes. 

Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI.): Admit it! You are a COLOSSAL LIAR! 

Cohen: I did lie. 

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-VA): Admit it! You lied to CONGRESS? 

Cohen: I just admitted it. 

At that point, Foxx “yielded back” her time (each representative had five minutes) to Rep. Jordan, who started shouting again. Rep. Jordan looked like he wanted to leap over the dais and throttle the witness. You got the feeling he was the kind of guy who could strangle a puppy without remorse. 

I decided to pause my TV and look up what Cohen said back on September 19, 2017, testifying before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. That’s when he lied. In those days, Republicans, and the president himself, were thrilled with what Cohen said under oath: 

Given my own proximity to the President of the United States as a candidate, let me also say that I never saw anything – not a hint of anything – that demonstrated his involvement in Russian interference in our election or any form of Russian collusion.

 

I assume we will discuss the rejected proposal to build a Trump property in Moscow that was terminated in January of 2016; which occurred before the Iowa caucus and months before the very first primary. This was solely a real estate deal and nothing more. I was doing my job. I would ask that the two-page statement about the Moscow proposal that I sent to the Committee in August be incorporated into and attached to this transcript.

 

I hit the pause again, to restart the hearings: 

Jordan (still yelling at Cohen): YOU SNAKE! YOU ARE A HUMONGOUS LIAR!!! 

Me (thinking): Cohen knew in September 2017 about a secret June 9, 2016, meeting with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort with agents of the Russian Federation. That was the meeting all three “forgot.” Then the truth came out because the “enemies of the people,” in the free press were digging to find it. Then the president lied about the purpose of the meeting. Next, Press Secretary Pinocchio (Sanders) lied and said her boss never lied about that purpose. Later the president’s lawyer admitted, “Okay, he did lie.” 

My reverie was interrupted by another shouting Republican, Rep. Bob Gibbs of Ohio. He called Cohen a liar. 

 

The President of the United States had to know. 

Me (still thinking): Cohen lied again when he claimed negotiations to build a Trump property in Moscow ended in January 2016. Those lies served to shield Mr. Trump. Surely, the next GOP lawmaker to speak is going to realize… 

Mark Meadows (R-NC): I hope you rot in jail for 5,000 years, Mr. Cohen. You are a liar. Have we not asked if you are? 

Cohen: I lied. So did the presi….. 

Meadows: SILENCE!! 

Me (still cogitating): Cohen lied about payments to keep a porn star’s story out of the news. Those lies also benefited Trump. Someone on the Republican side is sure to bring this up. 

Mark Green (R-TN): Liar, liar, pants on fire! Let the American people note: We have a poster to make the point! 

(He gestures toward it.) 



Meadows, Jordan and Massie: inordinately proud of their poster.


 

Me: If Cohen lied to Congress, the President of the United States had to know! The president had a tongue that wagged and Twitter thumbs to tap out correction. Even the greatest idiot ever elected to Congress should be able to figure this out. 

Or not… 

Thomas Massie (R-KY): I’m not going to ask you again, Mr. Cohen, you fraud, you faker, you falsifier? You LIED, DIDN’T YOU! 

Cohen: Yes. 

Massie (beaming): I knew it!!!!! 

Me (thinking, as always): Maybe I should mute the TV when Jordan talks next and just watch facial expressions…. 

Jordan: ----- 

Me: I never knew veins on a neck could stick out that far. Okay, next is this Democratic guy; I’ll unmute the TV. 

Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD): I wonder……………if………Mr. Cohen………… 

Me: This guy is phrasing his question so deliberately I don’t think he’s going to get it out before his five minutes are up. 

I take a quick bathroom break. When I return Sarbanes is done but I have no idea what he said. Another Republican is shouting at Cohen.

 

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ): You are a THUG, MR. COHEN. Also, has anyone mentioned that you are a cheat, a phony, and a swindler? If President Trump was a liar, a cheat and a racist, as you claim, why did you work for him for TEN YEARS!” 

Gosar gets so fired up, because he thinks he has Cohen trapped, that he blathers on and when he tries to launch into a quotation that he says he loves, his five minutes are up. He’s left mumbling incomprehensibly into his microphone. 

Me (pondering the obvious): If Cohen was a thug and a liar, why was Trump happy to keep him around for a decade? 

 

“Someone I always liked & respected.” 

The hearings continued. I was amused when GOP lawmakers acted as if they couldn’t believe what a sleazebag Cohen had always been – what with cheating on his taxes, which Cohen also admitted. Fortunately, I had a vestige of memory and knew Cohen had been the deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee until June 2018. He lost his post only after it became clear he might turn on President Trump and, shall we say, start correcting his story. 

I’m sure no one on the GOP side wanted viewers to recall that Elliott Broidy, another RNC deputy finance chair, had employed Cohen to arrange a secret hush money payment. In that case, Broidy had to fork over $1.6 million to shut up another Playboy Bunny – as opposed to the hush money payment Cohen helped arrange to shut up the other Playboy Bunny with whom Trump had had an affair. 

So, yeah – Cohen – what a thug!

Or was it a “rat.” Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-MD) seemed interested in the fact that the President of the United States had labeled Cohen a “rat” on Twitter, after it became clear he would cooperate with prosecutors. This seemed odd, because until it became clear Cohen was going to turn, Trump had tweeted, calling Cohen a “good man” and someone “I always liked & respected.” 

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) spoke next. Higgins, a bullet-headed gentleman, proved unique in that he was clearly baffled by the simplest facts. At one point, Cohen produced evidence, a signed check for $35,000, indicating President Trump was paying him as late as August 1, 2017, for his role in covering up the story of Stormy Daniels, in violation of campaign finance laws. 

He said he had more evidence he could share. 

Higgins: By thunderation, sir, where is this treasure trove of documents of which you speak? Why are you hiding evidence, good sir? Do you think we Republicans on this committee are fools? 

Cohen: These documents are in a storage locker. They were seized last April in a raid on my office and home. They aren’t “hidden.” They were returned to me by investigators after they gathered the evidence they needed. 

Higgins: What kind of monster would hide boxes of evidence, by God and all the 12 Commandments!!! 

Cohen: Um… 

There was, here and there during testimony, some good news for the president. Cohen said that he himself had never been to Prague. A potentially devastating allegation, included in the Steele dossier, was that Cohen flew there in the summer of 2016 to work out payments to Russian hackers so they could keep up their good work interfering in the election to help Trump win. 

A Democratic member, whose name I missed, asked Mr. Cohen about other stories he might have helped “capture and kill” to protect Trump. Was there an elevator tape that might show him striking Mrs. Trump, as had been rumored? Cohen was adamant in stating that he did not believe the president would ever strike his wife. He also said that he did not believe a tape of hookers peeing on a Moscow hotel bed for the viewing pleasure of Donald J. Trump existed. 

 

Trump must have wanted him to lie. 

That was it for the good news. Cohen pointed out that his false testimony in September 2017 had been vetted by defense lawyers for Mr. Trump. He said he discussed his testimony with the president himself. 

Me: So if that testimony was false… 

Meadows: Why are we listening to THIS DECEIVER, THIS DISSEMBLER? 

Me: Trump must have wanted him to lie… 

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY): When was the last time you had contact with Mr. Trump in regard to possible testimony before Congress or cooperation with investigators? 

Cohen: I think…about June 2018. I cannot comment further because the matter is part of an ongoing investigation in the Southern District of New York. I am in constant contact with prosecutors. 

Rep. Jordan gets five minutes “yielded back” by a GOP colleague and spends them calling Cohen a liar. 

Eleanor Norton (D-DC): Mr. Cohen, are there other crimes involving Mr. Trump which this panel should know about? 

Cohen: Yes. But I cannot comment further because investigations are… 

Rep. Meadows: Mr. Cohen, I would like you to look up here. Behind me, we have Lynn Patton, an actual African American woman! She has worked for Donald J. Trump for many years and now holds a government post. She says Trump is not a racist. How dare you say Mr. Trump is a racist now that we can show he has a black friend? 

(Ms. Patton stands there, not opening her mouth, looking like a hostage who might want to try blinking in Morse code.) 

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI): The fact that my colleague would use an African American as a prop is, in itself, a racist ploy. 

Meadows (looking like he might be suffering a stroke): How dare you call me a racist!!! 

Tlaib: Mr. Cohen, do you believe the president and others have been trying to intimidate you, to convince you not to correct the record before Congress? 

Cohen: I do. I worry. I never walk with my wife and children in public anymore. I send them ahead. I’m afraid one of Trump’s 62 million Twitter followers might attack the people I love. 

Finally, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has her turn to question the witness, and here, and in the Democratic questions above, we quote actual questioning and witness testimony verbatim. The young Democrat from New York goes straight to the point. She has learned, she says, that Trump often overvalued assets, golf courses and the like, if he wanted to win favorable loan treatment from large money-laundering, international banks. To avoid paying property taxes he would then order lawyers and accountants to undervalue the same properties. Was this an accurate assessment, she asked? 

Cohen: Yes. 

Ocasio-Cortez: Would anyone else know about such practices? 

Cohen: Allen Weisselberg, Ron Lieberman and Matthew Calamari. 

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez: A recent article in The New York Times notes that taxpayers spent $127 million to help build Trump Links, a Trump property in the Bronx, my district. But the deal allowed Mr. Trump to keep almost every dollar the golf club took in. Is it possible he undervalued Trump Links for tax purposes? On financial disclosure forms the president claimed that Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter, Florida was worth $50 million. Yet he reported to local tax authorities that the property was worth no more than $5 million [emphasis added]. 

Cohen: That is identical to what Mr. Trump did with Briarcliff Manor, another private golf club. 

Ocasio-Cortez: Would it help for the committee to obtain federal and state tax returns from the president and his companies to address that discrepancy? 

Cohen: I believe so. 

That was when I decided to click off the TV and go pour myself a stiff drink.

 

UPDATE (4/15/24): It would take four years before Congressional and state investigators managed to pry Trump’s tax records loose. It was then that we would learn, definitively, that Donald paid zero federal income taxes most years – whereas this blogger and his lovely wife always get slammed on April 15. 

See my excellent post: “President Trump Buys Some Bullets.” 

The Porn Star and the President - Part VIII

 

The Porn Star and the President – Part VIII

(A Story of Lying)


Trump and Stephanie Clifford (her real name).


IN PART VII, MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFIES BEFORE CONGRESS – AGAIN. THE FIRST TIME, HE LIED FOR TRUMP. 

THIS TIME, HE CORRECTS THOSE LIES. REPUBLICANS WHO QUESTION THE WITNESS ARE LIVID.

WE PICK UP THE TRAIL AGAIN:


3/4/19: In perhaps the least surprising story of the day, The New Yorker reveals collusion between President Trump and…Fox News! 

We have seen some of the evidence before: the incessant praise for Trump from the hosts of Fox & Friends, the daily dish of Trump lovin’ fed to viewers by the perpetually outraged-at-liberals Lou Dobbs. 

We watched Heather Nauert, former Fox News Bunny, serve as spokesperson for the Department of State. 

We saw Bill Shine, disgraced former Fox executive, hired to lead the White House communications department. 

There was Sean Hannity, popping up onstage at campaign rallies besides his chunky, orange pal. 

Then it was Hannity landing seven interviews with the president and Fox landing 37 more, each chock-full of softball questions…just to be sure the president looked good. 

Sample question from any Fox interview: “Are you the best president in history, Mr. Trump?” 

Trump: “Yes, and thanks for asking.” 

Interview ends. 

 

Fox News performed its own version of “capture and kill.” 

Now it turns out, a Fox reporter had the story of Stormy Daniels and her one-night stand with Donald before the 2016 election. The network performed its own version of “capture and kill,” despite proof Daniels was telling the truth – that Trump had cheated on his third wife, now First Lady. 

“Good reporting, kiddo,” a top executive told Diana Falzone, the reporter on the case. “But Rupert [Murdoch] wants Donald Trump to win. So just let it go.” 

As a writer for The New Yorker explains:

 

Falzone discovered that the National Enquirer, in partnership with Trump, had made a “catch and kill” deal with Daniels – buying the exclusive rights to her story in order to bury it. Falzone pitched this story to Fox, too, but it went nowhere.

 

Falzone was demoted the following January “without explanation.” She sued Fox and reached a settlement. Falzone signed a non-disclosure agreement.

 

So, there you go. 

Fox News: “Fair and balanced.”  We don’t let you hear the bad news about Trump. You decide. 

Also: Non-disclosure agreements are the best kind of news.

___ 

 

3/6/19: Michael Cohen spends another day on Capitol Hill, testifying in closed session before the House Intelligence Committee. This time, he brings several suitcases filled with documents. 

The New York Times reports that Cohen will provide a series of fat checks made out to his name, all signed by the president, or Don Jr., his dear, dumb son. These checks are part of a scheme to cover up the story of Stormy Daniels, for which scheme (in part) Cohen will soon be plunked into jail. The Southern District of New York in its filings on the case named “Individual 1,” the president himself, as an “unindicted co-conspirator,” which (based on the latest revelations) is kind of fun. 

The first check to Mr. Cohen was signed on February 14, 2017, by the newly sworn President of the United States. The day before, Trump had to fire his National Security Adviser, General Michael T. Flynn, for lying to Vice President Pence about contacts with Russians. 


 

Now Trump was signing that fat check – and afterwards, he would celebrate Valentine’s Day by calling in F.B.I. Director James Comey and asking him to go easy on good old General Flynn. 

Keep all of this in mind when you hear the president insist that Comey lies and not him. 

Or Cohen lies and not him. 

Or anyone lies and not him. 

There was another check to his personal lawyer for $35,000 in March, one in April (not yet found), then one in May, drawn on the president’s personal bank account. The June and July checks are still missing. Then we have another for $35,000, signed on August 1, 2017. 

 

On that very day, White House Press Secretary Pinocchio, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, confirmed that the president had “weighed in” on a letter Don Jr. wrote about a secret meeting held in June 2016 with a group of Russian agents. 

In retrospect, you can see how ridiculous the lies told by Trump and his sycophants have been. Sanders insisted then:

 

Look, the statement that Don Jr. issued is true. There’s no inaccuracy in the statement.

The president weighed in as any father would, based on the limited information that he had.

This is all discussion, frankly, of no consequence. There was no follow up. It was disclosed to the proper parties, which is how The New York Times found out about it to begin with.

That statement itself was shot through with untruths. The meeting itself was never “disclosed.” The New York Times dug up the story thirteen months after the conclave concluded. Don Jr. initially lied about the purpose of the gathering. Then dad lied too. Finally, a whole slew of aides, including Sanders, lied to cover up the president’s role in the debacle. If you had the feeling that Team Trump might be rife with liars, you wouldn’t be dreaming. 

In parallel, the checks to Cohen kept on coming – September 12, October 18, and November 21. The last of a dozen came on December 5, 2017, meaning that the president had been part of a scheme to cover up felony campaign law violations for almost a year.  

The evidence builds. Yet, in Trumpistan it makes no dent. As the Times reports:

 

“I think it’s news we knew about,” Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee and one of the president’s staunchest allies, told reporters during a break in last week’s hearing.

 

The payments, he said, could have been for services based on a retainer, although Mr. Cohen said there was no such retainer.

 

 

Trump claims to know nothing about the payments. 

Nor should anyone, not even a clueless Rep. Jordan, forget. In April 2018, Trump could still insist to reporters aboard Air Force One that he knew nothing at all about payments to Stormy.

 

Q: Mr. President, did you know about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels?

THE PRESIDENT: No. No. What else?

 

Q: Do you know where he [Cohen] got the money to make that payment?

THE PRESIDENT: No, I don’t know. No.

 

One thing President Trump does know, is he knows how to lie.


Oddly enough, the president isn’t done tweet-ranting for the day. At 6:56 p.m. on March 6, 2019, he sums up his legal predicament this way. He didn’t do anything wrong. No, the Democrats are out to get him on anything, even “a punctuation mistake in a document.”

Cohen doesn’t have the periods or commas. 

He has the checks. 

 

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). 

In a rare display of integrity, Judge Andrew Napolitano, perhaps Fox News’s top legal commentator, explains the dangers to Trump in Cohen’s testimony in an editorial in the Washington Examiner:

 

Hidden in the Cohen testimony was an oblique reference to alleged bank and tax fraud that Cohen claimed he helped Mr. Trump commit, contributed to Mr. Trump’s wealth and has the present interest of federal prosecutors in Manhattan. Many of these events took place more than five years ago and thus are not subject to federal prosecution, so why would prosecutors be interested in them?

 

Here is where RICO comes in. RICO is the acronym for a Nixon-era federal statute, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, originally enacted to target the mob. It permits federal prosecutors to reach back 10 years to find any two criminal acts, which need not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt; prosecutors need only demonstrate that they were more likely than not to have occurred. Then the feds can seize three times the wealth that the perpetrators of these schemes amassed. That could bankrupt Mr. Trump.

 

The president has serious and powerful tormentors whom he cannot overcome by mockery alone. He needs to do more than demean them with acerbic tweets, because many of those tormentors can legally cause him real harm. He needs to address these issues soberly, directly and maturely. Can President Trump survive all this? Yes — but not if he has another week like the last one.

 

First, it’s never going to be a good week for anyone who opens a newspaper and sees his or her name attached to a sentence about the RICO Act. 

Second, Napolitano is warning that Trump can only address his problems in a sober, direct, mature fashion. 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha! 

Not gonna’ happen!

___ 

 

3/8/19: Recent polls have Trump in a bit of a hole, with only 43.4% of Americans approving of the job he’s doing. Part of his problem is that most Americans believe he’s a liar. 

Mainly because he is. 

 

Only 35% said Trump. 

His former lawyer, Michael Cohen, is now a convicted felon, headed for jail. But when asked in a Quinnipiac poll, who they believed more after Cohen’s recent testimony before Congress, 50% of Americans said Cohen 

Only 35% said Trump. 

In fact, 65% of Americans said they believed Trump is not honest, and 64% think he committed crimes before taking office. Almost half, 45%, believe he has committed crimes since being elected. 

The Porn Star and the President - Part IX

 

The Porn Star and the President – Part IX

(A Story of Lying) 


The porn star and the future president.

IN PART VIII, TRUMP’S FORMER LAWYER, MICHAEL COHEN BRINGS CHECKS TO CONGRESS, PROVING THAT THE PRESIDENT KNEW ALL ABOUT PAYOFFS TO STORMY DANIELS AND OTHERS.

 

3/13/19: We all know President Trump is the only chief executive ever to claim he could pardon himself. 

(That should teach you all you really need to know about the man and his ethics.)

 

Today we have fresh news regarding pardons. Emails between Michael Cohen and lawyers for Mr. Trump have surfaced. 

 

“Sleep well tonight, you have friends in high places.” 

Before diving into this story, it helps to go back to April 9, 2018. That was the day federal law enforcement raided Cohen’s home, office and hotel suite and confiscated his electronic devices. From that moment on, it was clear authorities believed the president’s lawyer was involved in some kind of criminal enterprise. Prosecutors soon charged Mr. Cohen with eight felonies – while also listing President Trump as an unindicted coconspirator, or “Individual 1.” 

Cohen had to find out. Was he going to be protected by his longtime boss and top client, now the President of the United States? 

And his longtime boss had to find out. Would his former fixer still take a bullet for him and clamp his mouth? 

What made this unlike your garden variety criminal case was the president’s ability to grant pardons for federal crimes. Cohen had to be pondering his predicament. Lawyers for Cohen had to be wondering. How could their client make it clear he’d keep quiet if a pardon were coming? How could Trump’s lawyers hint to Mr. Cohen that a pardon would be forthcoming, and how could they make it clear what they expected in return? There has been a good deal of arguing in recent weeks about whether Cohen asked for a pardon first, or whether the president and his lawyers were all but guaranteeing a pardon in return for sealed lips. 

What is not in dispute is that the president has said he would not take pardons off the table (hint: for witnesses who protected him). That means any discussion related to pardons might devolve into classic obstruction of justice.

 

Initially, the president was all in on support for Cohen. Trump made this clear while speaking to reporters from the Oval Office just hours after the Cohen raids:

 

So I just heard that they broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys, a good man and it’s a disgraceful situation. It’s a total witch-hunt. I’ve been saying it for a long time….And it’s a disgrace, it’s a real disgrace. It’s an attack on our country in a true sense. 

 

On April 21, 2018, Trump signaled again where he stood regarding Mr. Cohen when he tweeted: 


 

So, what were Trump’s defense lawyers, and Cohen and his team, discussing that very day? Recently revealed emails allow us to see. 

“I just spoke to Rudy Giuliani and told him I was on your team,” Robert Costello wrote in the first email. It was one of two from Mr. Costello that popped up in Cohen’s email inbox on April 21, 2018. Costello was a longtime friend and associate of Giuliani and was serving as intermediary between the president’s old lawyer, now in serious legal jeopardy, and his new lawyer, Horndog Rudy, whose full-time job was keeping the president out of similar jeopardy. 

Rudy “asked me to tell you,” Costello wrote, “that he knows how tough this is on you and your family and he will make (sure) to tell the President. He said thank you for opening this back channel of communication and asked me to keep in touch.” 

We don’t know if Cohen responded. But CNN has seen a second, follow-up email, later that day. 

This time, Costello assured Cohen he had spoken with Giuliani and their conversation was “very very positive.” “There was never a doubt and they are in our corner,” Costello continued. “Rudy said this communication channel must be maintained. He called it crucial and noted how reassured they were that they had someone like me whom Rudy has known for so many years in this role.”  

Finally, he added, “Sleep well tonight, you have friends in high places.”

 

So, was this a veiled hint to Cohen – keep your yap closed and you can expect a pardon? If you have an ounce of objectivity, you know it is. Costello, however, told CNN that such an interpretation was “utter nonsense.”  

Well, CNN wanted to know, had a pardon been dangled in front of Cohen, or not? 

Costello scoffed:

 

Does dangled mean that he raised it and I mentioned it to Giuliani, and Giuliani said the President is not going to discuss pardons with anybody? If that’s dangling it, that’s dangling it for about 15 seconds. The first time I kind of danced around the issue because Michael brought it up with me and I told him, “Look, this is way too premature.... But if you want me to bring it up, I will bring it up.” And I did.

 

Premature, yes. 

On the table? No doubt. 

CNN tracked down Giuliani for this story and inquired: What about the “friends in high places” comment? 

What exactly could these friends in high places do for Mr. Cohen – and who might those friends be? 

“That was about Michael Cohen thinking that the President was mad at him [Cohen],” Giuliani told CNN. “I called (Costello) to reassure him that the President was not mad. It wasn’t long after the raid and the President felt bad for him.” 

Yes, the president felt bad for Cohen at the time – just like the president feels bad for Paul Manafort, as of today.

___ 

 

3/19/19: President Trump received a double dose of bad news today. First, he learned that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, his nemesis at the DOJ, would not be stepping down “for a little longer.” 

Second, he had fresh insights which indicated where the Mueller investigation might be headed.

 

____________________ 

“A veritable smorgasbord of criminal conduct.” 

Judge William H. Pauley III

 ____________________ 

 

Once again Mueller’s team reveals that they already have far more evidence than pundits on cable news can ever guess. Only now do we learn that the first search warrant, asking for Michael Cohen’s emails (dating to January 1, 2016), was filed on July 18, 2017. Two more warrants followed, one for cloud backup files on his phone, the other for emails dating to June 2015. 

We know that Mr. Cohen is going to jail for what Judge William H. Pauley III has called “a veritable smorgasbord of criminal conduct.” But these filings hint that Trump’s old lawyer wasn’t the only one sitting down to dine. We now know that F.B.I. agents received permission to collect “historical location data for two AT&T cellphones, from October 1 to November 8, 2016. This could be highly important, because there have been rumors Cohen traveled to Prague sometime before the election and met with Russian hackers to discuss how to cover up ties to the Trump campaign.

 

BLOGGER’S NOTE (3/22/23): Again, to be fair, this story about Cohen in Prague with hackers has not held up.

 

In all, the court filings total 895 pages, often duplicated in multiple applications for search warrants. But when we come to page 38, we find a section 18 ½ pages long, headed “The Illegal Campaign Contribution Scheme.” This entire section is redacted. What crimes and accomplices are listed beneath those pages, we cannot know. But in Trump World there has to be intense fear. 

The court records include a number of clues. In early 2018 we learn Cohen and his wife took a three month rental on Room 1728, an expensive suite at the Loews Regency Hotel in New York. Authorities decided to include a search of that suite in a fresh warrant. Agents made it clear they were after two cellphones they had been tracking, using a “triggerfish” device, and believed would be found at the hotel. These phones they believed would contain evidence of “bank fraud,” “wire fraud,” “illegal campaign contributions” and “conspiracy as it pertains to other Subject Offenses.” 

Most of the 895 pages relate to crimes committed by Cohen. Still, the depth and detail of information prosecutors have assembled must terrify any Trump aides or family members who may have committed crimes of their own – and that could be just about every other Trump aide and family member, save Tiffany, Barron, and Melania. We learn, for example, that “on or about October 26, 2016, Cohen opened a new bank account for Essential Consulting L.L.C., ostensibly to allow him to operate a real estate investment consulting firm. On January 31, 2017, Cohen’s account received the first of seven checks totaling $583.332.98 from a holding company controlled by Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian national, based in Switzerland. 

That’s right. Throw another Russian into the mix! 

Even before they raided Cohen home, office, and hotel investigators probably had him dead to rights. They knew Cohen used “encrypted communications applications,” including, “but not limited to, WhatsApp, Signal and Dust.” On page 81 of the filings, even the name of the F.B.I. Special Agent involved is redacted. Another section is redacted after an agent claims “there is probable cause to believe that Subject Premises-3 [Cohen’s offices] will contain evidence of the Bank Fraud Offenses.” 

In a warrant application filed on February 28, 2018, a judge agreed to a grant of a “non-disclosure order” for a search of an email account owned by Mr. Cohen. The Court ruled that if the search was revealed it might lead to “destruction of or tampering with evidence or flight from prosecution, or otherwise…seriously jeopardize an ongoing investigation.” Therefore, the warrant should not be disclosed for up to 180 days, “subject to extension” if required. 

The last warrant was issued on April 7, 2018, for permission to search “A Device containing the Results of Three Email Searches.” But that line was crossed out and replaced by hand with “Three Electronic Devices.” An agent, name and title again redacted, explained that based on “conversations with witnesses” and reviews of other testimonies he or she was asking to expand the search, in particular because “there is probable cause to believe that the Subject Devices contain evidence of violations” of federal statutes related to “illegal campaign contributions.” 

Another warrant, this one to obtain information from Cohen’s cellphones, notes:

 

Cellphone service providers have technical capabilities that allow them to collect at least two kinds of information about the locations of cellphones to which they provide service (a) precision location information, also known as E-911 Phase II Data, or latitude-longitude data, and (b) cell site data, also known as ‘tower/face’ or ‘tower/sector’ information.”

 

Then, a few pages later, a seventeen page section is redacted once more. In fact, in one section we learn that “Michael Cohen, a lawyer who holds himself out as the personal attorney of President Donald J. Trump” is under investigation for “violation of the campaign finance laws.” 

Then we have this:


Page with redactions.


We can’t read between the lines because there are no lines to read. 

We can guess that the name of the President of the United States may be currently hidden from view.